BLOGS
Since its inception in 1990, the MPAA has slapped the NC-17 on several undeserving movies. It has also withheld said application on more deserving films, either due to public fear or corporate pressure. Both cases yield ridiculous results. For example, Martin Lawrence's comedy concert film, You So Crazy, is rated NC-17, yet Mel Gibson's The Passion is rated R. One film spends 90 minutes talking about crap, Prince and getting a piece, the other spends over two hours beating the crap out of the Prince of Peace. Actions speak louder than words, and should be rated as such. If I go on a date, and we spend the evening talking, that's R (for profanity and sex-related begging). If I'm invited upstairs "for coffee" at the end of the date, that's NC-17 (for graphic sexu--oh, who am I kidding--for brief sexuality and extreme charity). Kevin Smith probably used a similar example when the MPAA rated his actionless film Clerks NC-17. He had more 'splainin' to do than Lucy Ricardo, however, when they slapped the dreaded rating on his latest, Zach and Mimi Make A Porno.
E! Online reports that the third time is the charm for Smith's film. After three submissions to the ratings board, Smith obtained the contractually required R necessary to get the Seth Rogen and Elizabeth Banks comedy into a theater near you. The mere implication of Seth Rogen in a porno is enough to draw the NC-107 (no one admitted unless dead and burning in hell) rating, but there's a bigger problem at hand here. The contractual R, a staple on all studio-financed films, proves to me that greedy-ass Hollywood wants 12-year-old boys to see all its movies, no matter how inappropriate. Rogen says of Porno "[t]his is not anything outside of what we've done before. The word 'porno' is in the title, and that kind of freaks people out." That may be true, but shouldn't porn-related material be proudly rated NC-17 and kept out of view of kids? Why has Smith's film been seemingly downgraded from 42nd Street to Skinemax?
I'm tired of somebody's snot-nosed kid causing my movies to be censored. The title of Smith's film alone implies that it isn't for the under-17 crowd, so why butcher it so they can see it? This is big studio and MPAA hypocrisy at its finest, matched only by my experience with the trailer for John Waters' A Dirty Shame. I took my niece and nephew to see something age-appropriate and the theater decided to run the trailer for the NC-17 rated Tracey Ullman film. They could do this because the MPAA allowed a green-band (all audiences) trailer for the film. "The following preview is approved for all audiences," the familiar screen said. "The film advertised has been rated NC-17 for pervasive sexuality." I said "Say what!?" Then my niece asked, "Uncle Odie, what's pervasive sexuality?" I didn't know she could read that well at that age, but I did have a G-rated answer. "Ask your mother," I told her.
I'm a little depressed that Smith didn't take his NC-17 and raise the rating above his head like a foul-mouthed, perverted Norma Rae, before throwing it through the window of a Blockbuster Video (which won't rent NC-17's) like Mookie in Do the Right Thing.
I'm tired of somebody's snot-nosed kid causing my movies to be censored. The title of Smith's film alone implies that it isn't for the under-17 crowd, so why butcher it so they can see it? This is big studio and MPAA hypocrisy at its finest, matched only by my experience with the trailer for John Waters' A Dirty Shame. I took my niece and nephew to see something age-appropriate and the theater decided to run the trailer for the NC-17 rated Tracey Ullman film. They could do this because the MPAA allowed a green-band (all audiences) trailer for the film. "The following preview is approved for all audiences," the familiar screen said. "The film advertised has been rated NC-17 for pervasive sexuality." I said "Say what!?" Then my niece asked, "Uncle Odie, what's pervasive sexuality?" I didn't know she could read that well at that age, but I did have a G-rated answer. "Ask your mother," I told her.
I'm a little depressed that Smith didn't take his NC-17 and raise the rating above his head like a foul-mouthed, perverted Norma Rae, before throwing it through the window of a Blockbuster Video (which won't rent NC-17's) like Mookie in Do the Right Thing.
Sponsored Links
1 Comments
Loading...
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Oscars 2012: The Winners
Oscars 2012: The Liveblog
Sunday, February 26, 2012: The 84th Annual Academy Awards
Today's TWoP News: Friday, February 24, 2012
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Parks and Recreation: Who Made the Comedy Grade Last Night?
Act of Valor: Reporting for Duty, Sir!
Wanderlust: Wet Hot American Hippies
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
February 2012
20 Entries
January 2012
25 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
Thanks for posting this. Would be intrested to read more or possibly please contact me by email thank you!