The Curious Case of David Fincher: A Benjamin Button Review

Someone tell me: What happened to David Fincher? When the director who brought us uber-dark, smart films such as Se7en, Fight Club and even The Game makes a sap-filled movie the likes of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, you have to ask yourself that question. And the only answer I've been able to come up with is that he must have grown a heart. And, for Fincher, this is not a good thing.

You've heard all about Benjamin Button, surely, what with that leading man, Brad Pitt. Fangirls who want to see hot Brad Pitt, though, will have to wait. And wait. And then wait another hour. Because, for the first portion (and vast majority) of the film he's in heavy makeup, and special effects are used to further make him look like a little old man. It's not clear how they got his voice to do that, but I wouldn't call it "acting" even if it was all his own affectation.

Here's the basic story of the film: An old, old, old (seriously; she might as well be dead) woman, played by Cate Blanchett is on her death bed in a hospital in New Orleans as Hurricane Katrina is approaching. Her semi-estranged daughter (Julia Ormond) is there, and Cate asks her to read from a diary. It turns out it belonged to one Benjamin Button, a man who aged backward. He was given up by his father and raised in a sort of old-folks home by a lady named Queenie (Taraji P. Henson, in a truly star-making performance; really; she comes in and steals the whole damn movie from big stars Blanchett and Pitt). As he "ages" in reverse, he comes into contact with the love of his life, Daisy (Blanchett), several times. He travels the world, fights in a war, falls in love with a married woman (Tilda Swinton), meets his real father, and more. And it could all be grand and epic -- and at times, it really is -- except for the thick layer of sap they're coated the whole thing with. You'll hardly be able to see through it, really.

The biggest sap mechanism is the frame story (the Julia Ormond-Hurricane Katrina plot), because, see, it's really pointless, because the story didn't need it for us to get involved and understand and follow along (honestly; when will filmmakers begin to trust that their audiences aren't idiots? I'm guessing never). Seriously, Ormond (as lovely and terrific is she is) cannot make up for how annoyingly sappy and weird Blanchett is in that old, old, old, old, old (did I mention she's old?) makeup, with an almost indiscernible voice. And it's just not necessary.

The movie might have actually worked quite well without the frame because most other things about it were decent, if not good. Sure, a lot of characters and stories came and went almost inexplicably, making one wonder why the movie had to stretch to nearly three hours if all of these extraneous bits never really amounted to anything. It felt like the movie was trying to be Big Fish, but couldn't make its collage of characters mean nearly as much.

That all said, you might find yourself won over emotionally by the love story, in spite of the movie's high level of cheese (and despite Pitt's rather wooden acting -- and terrible accent, which strangely isn't that bad when he's onscreen, but is horrible in voiceovers). I mean, really, watch yourself or you might find yourself in a crowded theater, watching a movie that's annoyingly sappy beyond belief, and all of a sudden you could end up sobbing almost uncontrollably. I'm not saying that happened to anyone I know or anything, but you never know; it could happen to you.

What did you think of Benjamin Button? Let us know below, then take a magical backwards journey through Brad Pitt's film library.

6 Comments

December 22, 2008 7:47 PM
mel
Reply

the short story is way better and not so much sappy.

December 26, 2008 2:27 AM
michele
Reply

I absolutely adored this movie. My son and his girlfriend did not catch my enthusiasm. They felt it was too long.They also did not understand the fantasy aspect involved in the story.
Anyway, I really lo-o-oved this movie and did not fell that it was too long.

December 26, 2008 2:28 AM
michele
Reply

I absolutely adored this movie. My son and his girlfriend did not catch my enthusiasm. They felt it was too long.

December 26, 2008 9:34 AM
Calli
Reply

WORST movie I saw this year. The entire audience groaned every time we flipped back to the frame and had to listen to ancient Cate Blanchett doing her annoying Katherine Hepburn voice. Nails on a blackboard would have been more welcome. POINTLESS.

And what's the point of Benjamin leaving his infant and writes a letter that's supposed to make it all better for the daughter saying things like, "you can do anything..." after he abandons her!? WTF was that about?

What about Queenie's daughter, Benjamin's sister? They throw her in and then she's gone?

What a complete mess of a film -- someone shoot the scriptwriter, the director, the editor, Blanchett's agent, Pitt for not using his star power to insist on a better script!

FIVE hours of pure torture -- yeah, I know it's advertised as three hours long but it felt like five. ANd speaking of time ... WTF was the point of the clock (other than the obvious) and who's job was it to integrate THAT stupid story line? What about Katrina? What was the point of all the build up of Katrina and then fizzzlllle?!

Seriously, stay home chewing on aluminum foil while listening to someone scratching nails on a chalkboard. Maybe you'll get hit by lightening (actually that was the only decent part).

January 11, 2009 7:44 PM
Augusta
Reply

Oh dear this movie was one i truly loved.
Great story and amazing acting. Very very glad i chose to see this movie.

March 5, 2009 9:11 PM
Akana
Reply

I can't make up my mind if I want to see it or not. :/ I remember seeing the trailers, and thinking it looked like the most moronic thing ever...

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Moviefile

January 2012

2 Entries

December 2011

27 Entries

November 2011

22 Entries

October 2011

22 Entries

September 2011

29 Entries

August 2011

27 Entries

July 2011

30 Entries

June 2011

25 Entries

May 2011

13 Entries

April 2011

23 Entries

March 2011

22 Entries

February 2011

33 Entries

January 2011

39 Entries

December 2010

21 Entries

November 2010

29 Entries

October 2010

23 Entries

September 2010

25 Entries

August 2010

26 Entries

July 2010

29 Entries

June 2010

36 Entries

May 2010

22 Entries

April 2010

26 Entries

March 2010

30 Entries

February 2010

19 Entries

January 2010

19 Entries

December 2009

15 Entries

November 2009

21 Entries

October 2009

27 Entries

September 2009

30 Entries

August 2009

28 Entries

July 2009

34 Entries

June 2009

27 Entries

May 2009

24 Entries

April 2009

23 Entries

March 2009

18 Entries

February 2009

30 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

61 Entries

October 2008

102 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

99 Entries

July 2008

116 Entries

June 2008

95 Entries

May 2008

86 Entries

April 2008

67 Entries

March 2008

14 Entries