Transformers 2: The Revenge of Michael Bay?

Today, director Michael Bay released on his blog a teaser poster for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, featuring the titular "fallen" Transformer who will be the sequel's main bad guy. And since I saw it, I've spent the last seven hours vacillating back and forth between excitement and skepticism. So why am I so torn about the new movie coming out this summer? Because for everything that I love about Transformers, there's something that I hate about Bay's vision of them, and I'm pretty sure I'm going to be as disappointed by this one as I was by the first. Bear with me while I pull a High Fidelity and make a list of pros and cons for why I have to see (or really shouldn't see) this movie.

(DECEPTI)CON #1: The first movie was a train wreck.
No, not a car wreck, although there were certainly plenty of those on-screen. No, I mean the plot, the robots' dialogue and most of the human performances were unbearably bad. The robot redesigns were certainly disappointing, since you often couldn't tell who was who at first glance, but even robots and vehicles that looked like the ones we all remembered wouldn't have hidden the fact that most of the movie was humans doing slapstick comedy, and at one point Bumblebee pees on John Turturro.

(AUTO)PRO #1: The second movie has even cooler Transformers in it.
Yeah, Optimus Prime was great, and pretty much all the Decepticons were scary as hell, but this movie is rolling out a lot of new models. Soundwave, the cool Decepticon who used to turn into a tape recorder, is back as a satellite. Arcee, one of the few female Transformers, appears here as three pink-and-purple motorcycles. Supposedly, the giant Decepticon named Devastator will also appear as the combined form of several vehicles. And the titular "Fallen," who's depicted on the new poster, is none other than The Fallen, a character from the comics who was one of the original Transformers. Of course, some people seem to think the robot on the poster is actually Jetfire, but that wouldn't be the worst thing I've ever heard.

(DECEPTI)CON #2: Michael Bay is still involved.
Michael Bay is not a very good director. You can tell me how much money he made 'till the cows come home, but Pearl Harbor is simply not a good movie. Neither is The Rock, nor Con Air, nor Bad Boys, nor Armageddon, nor The Island. Not that a movie about robot toys has to be Oscar-worthy, but it would be nice if it didn't insult our intelligence and didn't allow pointless comedic scenes to interrupt the movie's pacing. Sadly, Bay himself started to write this one while the writers were on strike, so expect even more Bay touches. (The peeing thing was all him, BTW.)

(AUTO)PRO #2: Megan Fox is still involved.
It's sad, but Megan Fox is actually more of a draw for me this time around than John Turturro. After his over-the-top performance in the last film, I'm not that interested to see him play the same role again. Meanwhile, Megan Fox can be stared at for hours, but only through a box with a pinhole in it.

(DECEPTI)CON #3: There's an ice-cream truck Transformer in it.
Transformers have turned into many things over the years. There have been robots that turned into cassette tapes, microscopes, flying saucers, dinosaurs, polar bears, tow trucks... you name it. But an ice cream truck? Really? Are we that desperate to make this movie funny? Oh, well -- at least it will be actual robots mugging for the camera this time, and not Anthony Anderson.

(AUTO)PRO #3: It's the frickin' Transformers.
I was born in 1977, which makes me, pretty much by default, a Transformers fan. Growing up in their heyday, I was bombarded with the cartoon, the animated movie, the comic books, the pencil cases, the lunchboxes and, of course, the toys. Having a father who knew people at the toy company certainly didn't help matters -- we lived in Rhode Island, which means not far from Hasbro HQ -- and while I don't collect them any more, I still consider myself a casual fan. Which is why I have a framed Transformers poster from my childhood -- given to my dad by one of the Hassenfeld brothers -- hanging on my wall today. (My wife is very understanding.)

...And I'm still torn. What about you all? Are you in or are you out?

8 Comments

January 9, 2009 9:12 PM
Meg
Reply

In. All in.

I was born in 1986 and never watched the cartoons, so I was able to enjoy the first (Michael Bay) Transformers movie without drawing parallels or worrying over whether or not it was faithful to the original.

Yeah, there was some seriously infantile scenes in the first one, but it's okay that a movie about robot aliens from another planet doesn't take itself too seriously. This one I enjoyed for sheer, exhilarating, summer blockbuster, kick-ass visual effects.

January 9, 2009 9:19 PM
Wotcher
Reply

What are you talking about? The first movie was not that bad. Granted, some of the plot lines were a little hard to swallow, but overall, I'm satisfied.

And Michael Bay may have a weird sense of humor, but you've gotta give the guy props for the action scenes. Massive explosions are his specialty.

So, for Transformers 2, yeah, I'm in.

January 10, 2009 1:29 AM
P@
Reply

In, but I will certainly hate myself in the morning. Just like every other Michael Bay experience. (I never learn)

January 10, 2009 12:47 PM
Erin
Reply

Oh, totally in. I actually really enjoyed the first one, as did my husband, who owns the aniversary edition of the animated movie and watches it more than he would care to admit. Sure, it wasn't Oscar fodder in any way, but it was fun in the same way I find most Bay movies. I'll be the first to admit that Armageddon was bad on many levels, but I still find myself entertained. We all deserve our guilty pleasures. :-)

January 11, 2009 11:34 PM
KB
Reply

I really liked the first one, I must say, but I have to take issue with the return of Megan Fox being listed as a Pro. Really? For such a movie snob (which I don't necessarily mean in a bad way), you have a pretty high tolerance for horrible acting. She's beautiful, definitely, but her acting in the first movie was so bad and the one real annoyance I had with that film.

January 12, 2009 2:25 PM
Michelle
Reply

I'm looking forward to it - I was born in 1975, so I, too was the age of its core audience at its peak, but was (and still am) a girl, so mostly by default was always more of a casual fan. This made it easier for me to be less picky about, and I was more able to enjoy the movie as its own entity.

January 14, 2009 6:34 PM
Skeletor
Reply

A very reluctant "in." I'd like to say that it is for professional/academic research, but that' a damn dirty lie I use to cry myself to sleep.

January 15, 2009 12:03 AM
Beat Fu
Reply

Okay, Megan Fox is an awful actress and she can't close her mouth. Sure, her body is nice but she reminds me a lot of the chick who plays Nikki or whatever from Hero's, it's like their teeth are just waaaay too big for their mouths. Add to that her really just atrocious acting and I'd hardly find her a pro. Shia Lebouf? He's a pro.

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Moviefile

January 2012

2 Entries

December 2011

27 Entries

November 2011

22 Entries

October 2011

22 Entries

September 2011

29 Entries

August 2011

27 Entries

July 2011

30 Entries

June 2011

25 Entries

May 2011

13 Entries

April 2011

23 Entries

March 2011

22 Entries

February 2011

33 Entries

January 2011

39 Entries

December 2010

21 Entries

November 2010

29 Entries

October 2010

23 Entries

September 2010

25 Entries

August 2010

26 Entries

July 2010

29 Entries

June 2010

36 Entries

May 2010

22 Entries

April 2010

26 Entries

March 2010

30 Entries

February 2010

19 Entries

January 2010

19 Entries

December 2009

15 Entries

November 2009

21 Entries

October 2009

27 Entries

September 2009

30 Entries

August 2009

28 Entries

July 2009

34 Entries

June 2009

27 Entries

May 2009

24 Entries

April 2009

23 Entries

March 2009

18 Entries

February 2009

30 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

61 Entries

October 2008

102 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

99 Entries

July 2008

116 Entries

June 2008

95 Entries

May 2008

86 Entries

April 2008

67 Entries

March 2008

14 Entries