Pattinson and Stewart were so bad that the movie became unintentionally hilarious. I really think they both attended the Joey Tribbiani school of acting.

I liked most of the cast the way it was. I think Dallas might be good in that part, but be a better vampire ? I think Lefevre did a good job in her role. Dallas I hope is not getting the part just because she is Ron's daughter, that's bull. I thought Taylor's role could have been better, I will have to see how he is in the next movie. I truly hope the chemistry between Bella and Edward doesn't change because of there personal lives. That would suck, and if they change actors for their roles, it will never be as good as they were in Twilight. These are the things that make me lose interest in sequals, you have to keep the original actors as much as possible or it isn't as good.

This casting "wish list" is obviously a joke, or the depressing attempt by someone really, really dissatisfied with their life to get a bunch of tweens in a tizzy. I got a good chuckle at your choices for a new Edward and Bella, laughed at loud at the idea of Jay Hernandez trying to play a 17-year-old Native American, and spit coffee across my keyboard at the idea of ANYONE but Billy Burke playing Charlie (Enrico Colantoni? are you INSANE???) Twilight was written for young adults. Real grown-ups who spend their time writing asinine articles ridiculing it are obviously far less mature than Stephenie Meyer's intended audience. Maybe you should concentrate more on recasting the latest Hannah Montana movie. That seems to be more along your levels of maturity.

The only person worth re-casting only because they don't fit their description is Nikki Reed. I would have picked Rachel Nichols before Evan but she's not a bad alternative. as an actress Nikki is fine but why pick a natural olive skinned brunette to play a porcelain skinned blond? Doesn't make sense...