BLOGS
When Bryan Singer left the X-Men film franchise to film the reboot of the Superman, comic fans were torn: on the one hand, he was leaving the characters he'd knocked out of the park twice already, in X-Men and X2: X-Men United, but on the other hand he was hopefully going to make Superman cool again. It's a win-win! Well, cut to a few years later, and it's a lose-lose: the retro throwback Superman Returns is underperforming at the box office and Brett Ratner's X-Men: The Last Stand is underperforming in fans' expectations. With Superman in line to get another, more reboot-y reboot, Singer is no longer involved, and is now talking to Fox about rejoining the X-Men franchise. While a small part of us would love to see a proper sequel to the first two decent X-Men movies, we mostly want him to stay far, far away. Here's why.
1. It's too little, too late.
Since Singer's departure, the X-Men franchise has mutated -- no pun intended -- into a completely different Beast. (Okay, that one was intentional.) For better or worse, Ratner's Last Stand completed the traditional trilogy by killing Jean Grey and Professor Xavier, although the latter's mental resurrection was hinted at in the final scene. Singer's muse Hugh Jackman has gone on to star in his own solo film, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and a sequel is already in the works, so his availability for another X-Men might be in question. That, combined with plans for a prequel film, X-Men: First Class, which would feature Xavier's young, original students, and a spin-off starring Ryan Reynold's Deadpool, doesn't seem to leave a lot of room for Singer, whose strength so far seems to be adult ensemble pieces with largely male casts, like The Usual Suspects and Valkyrie.
2. Superman Returns was... disappointing.
We get what Singer was trying to do -- he was trying to pay homage to and update the first two cheesy-yet-beloved Superman movies from 1978 and '80. Except Brandon Routh, while chiseled from the same stone as Christopher Reeve, lacked the original actor's charm, and the idea that Lois had given birth to Clark's illegitimate, super-powered son while he was away in space didn't sit well with some fans. Kevin Spacey was a wonderfully villainous Lex Luthor, but his continued fixation on real estate is getting a little old. Overall, the movie was heavy on disasters and soap opera-like relationships, but light on any other action, mainly due to there not being any supervillain who could stand toe-to-toe with the hero -- or any supervillain at all, for that matter. If this was how he followed up Superman I and II, how would he follow up X-Men 1 and 2? We shudder to think.
3. We get it: He has something to say.
In the article, Singer says that he likes to "trick audiences into thinking they're seeing fireworks, but they're learning about themselves and listening to what I have to say." That's all well and good, and we certainly appreciate the parallels drawn in the X-films between being a mutant and being gay or a minority, but at some point you need to quit tricking and start focusing on the fireworks. If you emphasize your message too much, then you get what happened on Superman Returns, where the production was overshadowed by the rumor that Routh would come out of the closet, a rumor not helped by his appearance on the cover of The Advocate next to the headline, "How Gay is Superman?" (The comparison was to Clark Kent's hidden life as a hero, but Warner Bros. certainly didn't appreciate the implication.) If the comparison can be made subtly or humorously within the context of a good story -- as in X2: "Have you tried not being a mutant?" -- then it's not a problem, but if your goal is always to "trick" the audience, then you clearly like superheroes for the wrong reasons.
Would you like to see Singer back in the X-fold? Register your opinion below.
12 Comments
Add a comment
Search thousands of recaps and more
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
February 2010
4 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
Blog Categories
A Festival for the Rest...ival
14 Entries
Accidents Do Happen
42 Entries
Adventures in Fakery
53 Entries
Animation Desensitization
55 Entries
Box Office Tally
55 Entries
Coming Soonish
7 Entries
Cool Nerds Guide
2 Entries
Director? I Hardly Knew Her!
127 Entries
DVDs Unwrapped
22 Entries
For Your Amusement (Park)
7 Entries
Foreign Relations
33 Entries
Galleries (and Other Picture Postcards)
23 Entries
Girls on Film
51 Entries
I Voted for GORE!
82 Entries
I Want My DVD
65 Entries
I've Got Two Tickets to Merchandise
32 Entries
IMDb Fun Times
1 Entries
Indie, Indie, Come Back Home
6 Entries
It Came From New York
4 Entries
It Came From San Diego
11 Entries
It's a Major Award!
41 Entries
Legal Eaglese
18 Entries
Let's Blame the Media!
47 Entries
Let's Go To The Video!
27 Entries
Letterbox of Recommendations
14 Entries
Lights, Camera... Action Jackson!
96 Entries
Little TV Shows That Done Hit the Big Time
64 Entries
Martial Artistry
8 Entries
Momentous Occasions
22 Entries
More On Movies
0 Entries
Musicalifornication
38 Entries
Obituaries Without Pity
19 Entries
Oscars and Grouchery
6 Entries
Pros and Controversy
15 Entries
Reviews of Movies We Haven't Seen Yet
26 Entries
Reviews of Movies We've Actually Seen
99 Entries
Scary Monsters & Super Creeps
51 Entries
Sci-Fidelity
101 Entries
Script From the Headlines!
54 Entries
Separate but Sequel
199 Entries
Strike Watch
14 Entries
Stupid Cinematic Celebrity Sayings
33 Entries
Taste the Reading Rainbow
70 Entries
The Art of the Cannes
6 Entries
The Biz
115 Entries
The Casting Conch
167 Entries
The History, Booooyyyyy!
63 Entries
The Kongs of Comedy
130 Entries
Theatre With an "R" and an "E"
9 Entries
Top of the
0 Entries
Top of the MWoP
4 Entries
Trailer Trashing
55 Entries
Trailers Without Pity
21 Entries
Video Games Killed the Movie Star
21 Entries
We Call Do-Over
148 Entries
We Watches the Watchmen
33 Entries
What's Up, Documentary?
8 Entries
When Animal Movies Attack
7 Entries
You Got Comic Book in My Movie
198 Entries
You Know, For Kids!
94 Entries
He had talent, time, and money but Superman was a BOMB. Please dont give him another chance-seriously.
Exactly! Multiple critical successes, one bomb. OBVIOUSLY he cannot be trusted with another film. Should we stone him? I say we stone him.
I 100% agree with you about the "tricking" messages Bryan has added into the X-Men...comparing being a mutant to being gay... I also hope he doesn't return much as i hope Chuck Austen never returns to writing the X-Men. The Beast? Gay? Really? REALLY?
For whatever it's worth, Beast was never really gay. He just kept saying that because he got out of a bad relationship. As for Singer, X-Men 4 probably can't be as bad as X-Men 3. Plus he can always bring Jean Grey back to life. I mean... she is the Phoenix.
i agree you can bring back any character in the X-men world but really i think it took them too long to put gambit in a movie he should've been there since the beginning he's with Rogue not Iceman!! i liked the iceman character until x-men 3 but if X4 is made gambit needs to be in it. and mr. sinister with all that mutant genetics experimentation its perfect timing to put him in. he can be the one that brings any character back to life with his experimentations. just my thoughts i adore the x-men franchise and the x-men themselves hav always been the heroes that raise the questions about the way society treats people differently because they are different so there's no need to trick the audience, again just my opinion.
I think he should definitely return. Wolverine wasn't that good and X3 wasn't as good as the first 2. He could direct the Wolverine sequel or First Class or even X4, i'll take anything. And for the record, i liked Superman Returns...
I vote for Singer coming back and rebooting it all so he can do the 3 installment he planned from the begining. Having Jean Grey and Cyclops dead, plus the professor on another body was not the right way to leave the franchise, IMO. And even though Singer Bombed the SR he has done enough good things to deserve another chance, IMO.
I love the idea of having Mr. Sinister in the movie. Magneto vs. X-men has been done to death and as much as I loved Sir Ian Mckellen in the role it is time to leave Magneto behind. He also is going to be busy with The Hobbit. Humans hating mutants was done to death too. So why not Mr. Sinister? Or maybe Apocalypse? I just want another X-Men movie. I also want comic book movies done right.
Mr. Sinister would be a good choice, as Aimee pointed out. If you don't do Sinister, at least give the Sentinels their proper due, not that cheap teaser we were shown. That was Bull IMO.
I wouldn't mind Bryan Singer returning. I like his X-Men movies better than the other two.
Superman Returns was supposed to be a family-equse movie: most people reading this website are not the target audience. I'm with Craig: the man's been hugely successful, and we're slamming him for one bloomin' failure?
(Me, I liked the change of pace for a superhero movie. Everyone is being dark or explosive-y, and Singer tried a different track)
it annoyed me that they killed off cyclopes. not because i like him that much, but because that ruins the entire saga between him and jean. i agree that gambit needs to be involved, and i'd love to see a stronger (emotionally) rogue than we got. adding in apocalypse would at least force the brotherhood and the x-men to work together, and maybe get nightcrawler back into the mix... i missed him.