BLOGS
It's a Sequel! It's a Re-Boot! It's a Chance to Fix Four Franchises!
Four action-movie franchises have been in the news recently with good news -- all of them will be getting new installments in the near future. Daredevil, Riddick, Superman and Mission: Impossible's Ethan Hunt will all be returning to work, and they all have some big decisions to make. Besides M:I, which already reinvents itself stylistically with every film, they're all coming off of what could have been franchise-killing movies, so they're all going to have to follow M:I's lead. Here's some advice to the producers on what we want to see in each potential re-boot.
1. Every Hero Needs to Have Good Character
Daredevil: After Ben Affleck's laughable turn as a vigilante in the one and only Daredevil flick, the re-boot needs someone who's believable as a lawyer, someone who can do action, and occasionally crack a joke -- how about Bradley Cooper? Cut his hair and make him shave, and we'd totally buy him as a lawyer.
Riddick: Vin Diesel's mysterious character in Pitch Black was the whole reason The Chronicles of Riddick was made, and yet they crammed it full of crazy supporting characters and focused more on the special effects. If you've got Vin, just center it around him, and don't try to make him more than the enigma he was in Pitch.
Superman: The experiment to replace Christopher Reeve with near-lookalike Brandon Routh in Superman Returns had mixed results, so maybe they should cast someone based on their personality, rather than their looks? Jared Padalecki from Supernatural has the height, jawline and "aw, shucks" attitude to play a farm boy with a journalism degree.
Mission: Impossible: With the exception of Tom Cruise and Ving Rhames, the entire team changes every film, similar to how the show worked. Obviously, Cruise will always be the star, but as he pushes 50, he's going to need to become more of a dapper Peter Graves type, and leave the ropework to a younger cast member. In that respect, the series could be a nice testing ground for future action stars.
2. For the Villain, Go With the Classics
Daredevil: Last time around, Michael Clarke Duncan was more cuddly than evil as the Kingpin and Colin Farrell was more funny than scary as Bullseye, but it was love interest Elektra who ended up being the real villain, with her bad acting and less-than bearable spin-off film. Since no one remembers what Elektra was actually about, I'd take the bad guys from that film -- the villainous Hand ninja clan -- and have them try to take over Hell's Kitchen.
Riddick: In the first movie, Riddick fought predatory aliens who only came out at night. They were awesome. In the sequel, he fought a race of beings who subjugated planets in their quest to reach the Underverse, or something, and could move really fast by manipulating time, or something. They were less than awesome. Vin Diesel does not need a complex, over-written foe in order to kick said foe's ass.
Superman: Lex Luthor is a classic Superman villain -- the classic Superman villain, in fact. But Superman Returns continued the portrayal of Luthor as a comically amoral real estate scam artist, which doesn't exactly make for a great superhero movie. If they aren't going to turn Luthor into a battlesuit-wearing mad scientist, then they should introduce a super-strong foe like Parasite, Metallo or Bizarro that Superman can punch in the face repeatedly.
Mission: Impossible: Whoever thought Phillip Seymour Hoffman was the right choice to play the arms dealing villain in an action film was -- presumably director J.J. Abrams -- well, that was some interesting casting right there. Maybe someone more traditionally intimidating for the next one? You can never go wrong with a German.
3. Keep the Story Simple
Daredevil: The doomed romance between Elektra and Daredevil is the stuff of legend in the comic world, but the translation of that into film was less than inspiring. The framing of Daredevil for murder was corny, his instant agility upon being stricken blind was comical and his tendency to murder those he couldn't prosecute was an unfortunate character flaw that was presented as business as usual. Let's start him out in a lighter place, then slowly bring him into the dark, shall we?
Riddick: The Chronicles of Riddick spanned several planets, had a number of different races, and made Riddick not just the last of his kind but also the chosen one, all of which made it the most complicated cliché in cinematic history, when it totally didn't need to be. If the producers can bring it back to basics, they'll have another hit on their hands.
Superman: With Dark Knight's Chris Nolan on board as overseer, hopefully we'll avoid another real-estate scam like the last one, and there will be no mention of Supes' ill-conceived, illegitimate child. A word of advice: the last time the Superman franchise knocked our socks off was when three Kryptonians landed on Earth and wreaked havoc. Superman is the last Kryptonian, but he's not the only alien -- let's get an alien invasion going and put Superman on the front lines.
Mission: Impossible: Despite the changing directors and rotating supporting cast, every installment seems to feature a mole in the Impossible Mission Force, or a double agent. Betrayal and intrigue are the name of the game, but let's do a little house cleaning at the IMF before we send Ethan Hunt back out in the field. Hopefully, Simon Pegg's hacker character is on the up-and-up.
What do you want to see in these four re-boots/sequels? Play producer below.
Sponsored Links
34 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, January 6, 2011
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Indie Snapshot: The Iron Lady, Pariah and A Separation
TWoP 10: Reality Franchises That Should Be Benched
Friday, January 6, 2012: Supernatural
Portlandia is 2 Broke Girls for the Discerning Viewer's Soul
Today's TWoP News: Thursday, January 5, 2012
Modern Family: The Best Lines From the Winter Premiere
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
January 2012
2 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
I always thought that Mxysptlk would make a Superman movie that only I would see...
But I disagree about bringing the aliens into the canon. Let's work with non-Lex villains, though. I think Toyman and Metallo would make nice fight scenes and create an interesting plot together.
Riddick is at his best when battling the elements (burning sun, bad terrain) but when we left him in Chronicles, he'd just taken over an empire. How about a prequel?
See, I actually LOVED Brandon Routh as Superman. I thought he was the best part of the new movie. I'd always thought Christopher Reeve was the weakest part of the original movies. Routh was more believeably awkward in that he appeared awkward because he was always hiding his true self and fumbling with maintaining the facade. Reeve was just a straight-up pussy.
Thanks for mentioning Jared Padalecki as a possible Superman casting choice. That would be a really exciting idea if Supernatural had not just been renewed for a sixth season. :-\
I also thought Brandon Routh played Superman quite admirably. The deepest flaw was Kate Bosworth and the plot surrounding Lex. Kevin Spacey was an excellent choice, but his story was weak. Otherwise the plot was quite good.
Good lord, Chris Nolan? That's gonna suck. Heath notwithstanding, The Dark Knight was a borefest. He'll make sure the girls don't show up for Superman.
Ahhh, yes. The third highest grossing movie of all time didn't have any women in the crowd. I'm sure. Nolan made Batman's story epic. Something that few directors have been able to do with superhero movies. I can't wait to see what he does with Superman. With the other movies, I do think it's best that they don't go to overboard with the plot. If I have one knock against Dark Knight, it's that there was too much going on. Give the first movie for the reboot a more simple plot. Not boring, but don't overstuff it.
I'm sure what you mean is that Reeve's Superman was a pussy. Christopher Reeve himself was pretty damn awesome.
I totally agree with Riddick going back to basics. Even though the last movie ended with him winning an empire, I'd like to see them do something, like have him be overthrown by Karl Urban's character or him leaving the empire on purpose, where he ends up back on the planet from the first movie. From there on, I'll be happy with just watching Vin kick major alien ass....
I liked both Reeve and Routh as Superman. What I didn't like was the retread of the original movie--we wound up with something that was much too in love with its special effects. Much as I liked Singer's X-Men movies, his Superman was too reverent--and yet somehow managed to be the only Superman movie in which I sat there in the theater and questioned the physics of Superflight. (And for how long did we watch him lift that island? It felt like three days.)
Kate Bosworth was tremendously miscast as Lois Lane, and Kevin Spacey only delivered as Lex in two lines. I even think it hurt to cast James Marsden--he was able to make his throwaway character strong and compelling, and made me wonder why you'd consider leaving him for someone who is always away saving the planet (compounded by the fact that Marsden's character actually saves everyone, including Superman). Lois's last article would have been better titled "Why the World Needs Richard White."
I agree with others that Brandon Routh actually made a good Superman and that Kate Bosworth (who I normally like), was not a very good Lois Lane. But overall I thought the story was very well-wrought, subtle and compelling, so it worked for me. And for the record, Lex Luthor's plan was a little bit more than just a "real-estate scam." Also, good luck getting a movie with no mention of Superman's son. No one will think that's weird. "Hey...didn't Superman have a kid a while ago...?"
Trigeek, I'm also with you on The Dark Knight. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a borefest, but it didn't live up to Batman Begins for me at all. It didn't have the excitement of BB and on the whole it was just too bloated. It's as if it took everything that made BB great and expanded on it until it was unrecognizable.
I liked the "son" storyline of superman. Maybe they should do a "Son of Superman" run of movies and totally free themselves up to make a new mythology.
Doomsday would be Fantastic. I wanna see The Death of Superman: The Movie. Especially the part where blue beetle gets stepped on.
Superman: Red Son would be amazing also, but they'd never make a film with Communist Superman.
Supes: I am tired of Superman always going against Lex. There are other, better villains in his mythology. Brainiac and Darksid each could spawn a trilogy easily.
Daredevil: The main villain was written badly. Kingpin is his primary antagonist, but he normally hires lackeys to do the heavy lifting. Not a coward, but not stupid either.
Bradley Cooper sounds like a good choice. Anyone else think Jensen Ackles for Daredevil too"
If Nolan is going to follow the Batman formula, then Superman is going to be overly long with a nonsensical stupid plot and with the villian playing an over-the-top caricature of the original villian and stealing the show.
I guess in this case would be Gene Hackman's version of Lex Luthor. Anytime he needs Kryponite to mess with Batman, it'll fall from the sky directly into his hand - he's just that clever.
I thought Phillip Seymour Hoffman was actually pretty spot on as a terrifyingly amoral/violent arms dealer.
And, really, can we just put a bullet in the Riddick series? Pitch Black was good, but still almost funny due to Vin's attempts at 'acting'. He hasn't been believable since Boiler Room.
Superman Returns was too stuck in the past. It went beyond simple homage to arrested development (not series, the bad kind). The next Superman movie needs to take a look at where the comics have been for the past 20 years.
Here's what I want to see. Lois knows Clark=Superman. The two of them are actually better when she knows his secret and is an ally rather than damsel in distress. Rather than fight about Clark's mysterious disappearances, they fight about why Clark accidentally destroyed the one coffee shop in town that makes a decent latte. Or how he's never home because he's got to stop yet another petty bank robbery.
My favorite Superman movie is Superman:Doomsday, because for all it's flaws, it got their relationship right. It was mature and adult and they argued about real relationship issues. Even the show Lois & Clark got a lot of their relationship right, until season 4 when the creators lost their damn minds.
Lois needs to know, and no amnesia kiss either. She knows and the two of them make it work somehow. That's a great movie.
Well, that and some actual super-villains to fight. I like the idea of alien invaders, that would be sweet.
I actually liked Routh's Clark Kent/Superman, for the non-demanding role it was, but the story was crap. Padalecki is bland and has no acting depth. I could see him as Conan, Hercules, or any other beefcake type, given the job to stand around shirtless and flip his hair, but not in a role that really needs some chops. The other guy on that show has the chops, and then some, but not the build or age that the studio will likely want for this role. I trust Nolan will find the right guy for the part. He worked a miracle with his reboot of Batman, I think he can do the same with Superman.
RE Mission Impossible, Is the certified badass Rutger Hauer still available... I'd pay good money to see him torture the obnoxious Tom Cruise.
Ding ding ding ! Soporific got it, mentioning the "Superman: Doomsday" direct-to-DVD. Plenty of the things folks are asking for/HAVE been asking for for years/decades out of a Superman film have been done extremely well in animated form. Between "Superman: Doomsday" and the DC Animated Universe franchise, fans of superheroes or just damn good action-adventure on screen have been treated to some fine storytelling. Yes, in cartoons, but cartoons that were as much for adults as they were for kids (and sometimes really not ALL that much for kids, since some of the depth/complexity would've flown way over kids' heads).
From Batman: The Animated Series, which started in 1992, through about four more different series in between, culminating in Justice League, which ended in 2006, we had one giant, tightly-knit mega-continuity of a franchise, overseen entirely by Bruce Timm and Paul Dini.
Stop waiting for them to get it right in live action form. They're not gonna go above a PG or PG-13 for a Superman film anyway, so it's not like they're gonna DO more or get any more ambitious about the plot than they already did in the animated shows. I dunno why everyone's so in love with live action adaptations of comic books, animation makes a hell of a lot more sense. Watch the animated shows, and marvel at how satisfied you are.
Here is my idea: ban Bryan Singer from making another comic book movie. The guy is an overrated hack who completely screwed up both X-men and superman.
Brainiac is clearly the villain of choice for a Superman reboot. Particularly if they go with the animated series/ Smallville recasting of Braniac as a Kryptonian AI. This doesn't mean no Luthor - far from it. A film with both Luthor and Braniac as villains could work without running into the usual problem of overloading a movie with villains, since the two play off each other in a way that (for example) Penguin and Catwoman don't.
I have to agree with Rodney. I'm a girl, and I saw The Dark Knight about four times. And I will see any movie Chris Nolan makes from now on...
I liked Brandon Routh as well. The reason Superman sucked was IMO because of the script and the storyline.
All excellent points, except one thing: a Daredevil reboot is NOT good news, so long as Fox still owns the rights.
"ban Bryan Singer from making another comic book movie. The guy is an overrated hack who completely screwed up both X-men and superman."
So what are your feelings on Brett Ratner? Because IMO that's who screwed up the X-Men franchise.
You want an alien menace for Supes to fight in his next film?
How about Lobo? He's been hired by an unknown alien presence (who may or may not be revealed as Brainiac to set up the next movie) to bring in the Last Kryptonian alive.
Cast Hugh Jackman, since Lobo seems to have been originally conceived as an over-the-top parody of Wolverine anyway...
You cannot fix what is already broken. Which is not to say that any of these things were broken to begin wtih, but its to say that they were broken so recently that any attempt to recreate is going to seem more putting scotch tape on a broken vase then making your own vase again, and better yet they think they are going to go to the store and buy a new vase which is of course not a real option either. I would never see Riddick again, or a another mission impossible, at least not for 20 years. and superman and daredevil are easy, they don't have to be great they just have to not suck, so make it look awesome, they had a hard time getting me into the theaters on both simply based on the trailers, IN FACT, i never saw the new superman I had zero interest, it looked boring. I want to see a big crazy fight, like the end of the iron man 2 trailer to hook me into the theater.
So I'm sure I'm alone in this, but I really liked Superman Returns. And I liked Routh in the big man's role. And I liked the kid.
I wish more people had taken to it but I suppose with comic-book films, you're just dealing with too many purists who have certain expectations and aren't down with alternatives and producers need to reach a certain "geek quota" or something.
Shame.
Another girl here who loved The Dark Knight.
Speaking of TDK, Aaron Eckhart would make a fantastic Daredevil, methinks. Charming, witty, totally believable as a lawyer. I think Ryan Reynolds might be surprisingly good in the role, too.
As much as I love Jared Padalecki, I have to agree 100% with Randy's assessment of him upthread. I'd pick Christopher Gorham for the role. (Have you seen him in Jake 2.0? Boy is BUILT.)
Would also love to see Misha Collins (sexy Russian accent optional but preferred) as a villain in Daredevil or Mission: Impossible.
Sorry Kristin, but it has nothing to do with comic book purists...it has to with quality. The kid was lame, lame, lame, and while I liked Routh as Clark Kent, his Superman was lacking something...
Then again, I liked Jennifer Garner as Elektra, despite her not looking Greek at all. I thought she was the best thing about Daredevil...which made the Elektra movie all the more disappointing.
Randy, did you watch "Gilmore Girls"? Padelecki showed a great range of well-played emotion in that series. He's got the chops.
Add another woman to the list who liked the Dark Knight and Batman Begins...I've been a fan of Nolan's since Memento, and was excited when I read he would be helming a new Superman film. I also liked Brandon Routh in the role, although Kate Bosworth's Lois Lane was flat and I agree Katenonymous, James Marsden's character was great...He is always getting passed over in movies for the other guys- I'd rather be with Richard White or Scott Summers than Superman or Wolverine! Someone should cast him as the superhero!
Also, I think some of the issue with developing new plotlines (at least for Superman) is the relative obscurity of the other villains- A lot of people think of Lex Luthor as the only villain in that franchise, so introducing a character from the comic books as the new villain in the films would have to be done right. It can't be done like the latter Batman/Spiderman films- the ended up cramming too many villains in those last few movies and it was not good.
Brandon Routh was horrible and that movie sucked. Lex Luthor is the the main bad guy but can't fight Superman. I say make Lex a behind the scenes guy who finds some of the other Superman villans.