BLOGS
Irvin Kershner, the director of The Empire Strikes Back, passed away over the weekend, and everyone is filled with kind words about the man who gave us the greatest Star Wars film. But Kershner directed other movies, as well, in a broad assortment of genres, from romances to thrillers to comedies, and he was apparently the go-to guy for sequels, having directed three besides Empire -- none of which featured his hand on the original. I haven't seen The Return of a Man Called Horse, but the other two are personal favorites, so I thought I'd shine a spotlight on them, since Empire has its own arsenal of spotlights.
Never Say Never Again
By 1983, America had sat through six Roger Moore James Bond films and one George Lazenby one, and the franchise was still haunted by the spectre (no pun intended) of Sean Connery, the original Bond. So it was kind of a big deal when Connery (who had previously worked with Kershner in A Fine Madness) came back to play an aging Bond in a new adaptation of Ian Fleming's Thunderball. But this wasn't some kind of mummy-bond, like Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull -- Connery was still in fine grey-templed shape to romance Fatima Blush, an egomaniacal assassin skilled in sexpionage (thank you, Undercovers), and Domino Petachi, played by a young Kim Basinger as a naive dancer, and not a nuclear scientist or something, thank God. There are plenty who prefer the original Thunderball to Never, but I prefer the latter, which has a more epic, global feel, thanks to the Central American opening and the climactic scene in West Africa. Klaus Maria Brandauer's sly, villainous Max Largo is scarier than the older, eyepatch-wearing Emilio Largo (Adolfo Celi), even when he's playing lethal video games, and Bernie Casey is great as the first black Felix Leiter. Heck, all of the cameos are great. Max von Sydow plays Blofeld! Rowan Atkinson plays a British embassy staffer! Not the best Bond sequel ever, but definitely the best remake of a Bond sequel.
RoboCop 2
While Never Say Never Again is at least appreciated by Bond fans, the nicest thing most RoboCop fans can say about RoboCop 2 is that it's better than RoboCop 3, which isn't saying much. But I happen to love the film's imagery, even if the heart of the original is dealt with early on and replaced with violence and the villainization of psychology. Part of that is the fact that comic book writer/movie director Frank Miller (300, The Spirit, Sin City) wrote the screenplay on which the movie was at least partially based, and it was apparently he who gave the film its 10-year-old drug kingpin and evil female psychologist, who emasculates the hero and creates a new, villainous RoboCop. Classic Frank! The kinder, gentler RoboCop is at least funny, and the RoboCop 2 robot is even uglier and more unwieldy than ED-209 in the first movie, which I like to think is intentional. Sure, the plot gets pretty dumb at times, but the fake commercials and outrageous violence are still intact, and isn't that at least half the reason we love the first one so much?
Share your love of Kershner (or remembrances of The Return of a Man Called Horse) below, then see who our favorite Star Wars actor is.
Want to immediately access TWoP content no matter where you are online? Download the free TWoP toolbar for your web browser. Already have a customized toolbar? Then just add our free toolbar app to get updated on our content as soon it's published.
Sponsored Links
2 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Tuesday, March 27, 2012
I Want My DVD: Tuesday, March 27, 2012
TV on DVD: Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Brooklyn 11223: Say Ciao to Jersey Shore
Tuesday, March 27, 2012: Best Ink
How The Amazing Race and Survivor Got Their Grooves Back
Today's TWoP News: Monday, March 26, 2012
Five Reasons We're Glad Mad Men Is Finally Back
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
March 2012
22 Entries
February 2012
24 Entries
January 2012
25 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
I appreciate the informative comments seeing as how I plan to never watch either of those two movies, but spending more space on complimenting Kershner's direction rather than complaining about the writing would've been more appropriate.
Everything that I've heard and read suggests he had an enviable ability to somewhat compensate for weaknesses in the original George Lucas story for ESB.
that he is a conservative' who doesn't want gnvnremeot interfering with a person choice to choose their own doctor yet he is advocating and praising his pension and health care reform bill'. He's worried about millionaires moving out of NJ if he raises their taxes (even though the data proves otherwise)? I was born and raised in NJ and moved back here after graduate school to serve the needs of NJ public school children and parents. If this bill passes with these health care restriction provisions, I'm moving to another state. Why live in such an expensive state with a Governor who has created a hostile environment for public sector workers and retirees. I can't remain in a state where I'm treated with disdain. This is another sign of Governor Christie's hate of public employees. I'm ashamed to be a NJ resident. By the way, there are many public sector employees, including my husband who has worked for the local gnvnremeot for the last eight years and previously worked for a large financial firm for 30 years, who understand the need to help save their pensions. What angers them is that they didn't cause this mess and the Governor has portrayed them as the cause of the pension problems. He has refused to acknowledge that it was the failure of the state to contribute to the pension plan and that the employees have voluntarily increased their contributes to help the pension plan. He has refused to call out the PRIVATE and NOT-FOR PROFIT INSURANCE COMPANIES who have increased the premium rates year after year. He has failed to acknowledge that many teachers and other public employees have taken pay freezes before he took office (I didn't have a raise two years between 2001 and 2008 and the other five years I received a 1% pay raise due to rising health care costs and the need to raise the minimal salary to attract young teachers during the boom years) instead convincing angry unemployed or underemployed NJ residents that it was GREEDY' teachers and public employees who created the problem.I don't mind sacrificing but don't rewrite history to victimize the victims. We are the only ones who have contributed to the pension plan for two out of the last 17 years. How dare he lie to the NJ public that we're to blame for the pension deficit!!! It is past Governors and Republican/Democratic legislators who caused this mess, remember the Teachers and Public Employees pension funds were 100% funded in 2000!!!