BLOGS
Hayden Christensen. John Leguizamo. Thandie Newton. When I heard that three of my least favorite actors were going to be in a movie together, I knew I had to see it. Sure, it didn't have John Travolta or Katherine Heigl, but let's not get carried away, here. We don't want people to hurt themselves. The plot didn't even matter -- it looked like a sci-fi horror movie to me, and that's all I needed to know. As long as everyone got to over-act, and then be annoyingly glib with each other, I would be happy, and in that respect the film didn't disappoint. Unfortunately, the plot left a lot to be desired, and the cast spends the entire movie fighting off darkness and shadows with flashlights. Hayden Christensen once taught us to never underestimate the power of the dark side, but it's not enough to base an entire movie on.
In the film, Christensen wakes up in a city where most of the population has disappeared overnight, leaving behind their empty clothes and empty cars and crashing airplanes. (Shades of FlashForward!) It seems that living shadows are finding us and taking us away, only they need complete darkness to do it, and they can shut off the power to places to get it. As a result, only a personal light source can keep them away: a lighter, a flashlight, a glow-stick, etc. If you can get a car to start, car headlights will also work -- even though they apparently didn't work initially, nor did airplane control panels. Gas-powered generators work, too, and it's a bar powered by a generator that Christensen (now a heartless scavenger) arrives at days later, followed by a nurse (Newton) and a projectionist (Leguizamo). The bar is run by a boy whose mother has gone missing, which means all four have lost somebody important to them. And with the days getting shorter, the gas running low, and the shadows starting to mimic their lost loved ones (or are they actually the loved ones?), time is running out, which leads to a lot of fighting and flipping out on each other.
The movie is technically post-apocalyptic, but it's not like we get to see too many cool scenes -- it's low-budget film, so it's really dark outside most of the time, with a lot of shooting day-for-night, and they keep adding more shadows in post, including human-shaped statues that stand around and watch them from a safe distance. I'd say that the idea of shadows hunting us sounds cool, but it's been done before, in a million movies where shadows reach out to attack somebody, and they've even walked around and done stuff in movies like The Eye. It's never really made clear what these shadow creatures are, but they're pretty uninteresting as bad guys, both visually and motivationally. They can't go near light, but they spread darkness, so it's not exactly clear why they can't catch these remaining people, let alone why they want to. So if you're looking for a generically spooky supernatural thriller, catch the movie on demand, but don't expect the film to shed any light on the storyline.
Vanishing on 7th Street opens Friday at the Village East in New York City, but is also available on demand. Let us know what you thought of it below, and click here for more reviews!
What are people saying about your favorite shows and stars right now? Find out with Talk Without Pity, the social media site for real TV fans. See Tweets and Facebook comments in real time and add your own -- all without leaving TWoP. Join the conversation now!
Sponsored Links
4 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, January 6, 2011
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Indie Snapshot: The Iron Lady, Pariah and A Separation
TWoP 10: Reality Franchises That Should Be Benched
Friday, January 6, 2012: Supernatural
Portlandia is 2 Broke Girls for the Discerning Viewer's Soul
Today's TWoP News: Thursday, January 5, 2012
Modern Family: The Best Lines From the Winter Premiere
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
January 2012
2 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
It's Hayden CHRISTENSEN. IMDb is your friend. ;)
Guess you didn't get the metaphor of the film - it's the way we look at our own deaths. There are no clear explanatins as to why we die and what happens after we die. The movie is structured like that. The characters don't know why this is happening to them and when they might just "vanish". It's unsettling, a thinking man's thriller.
Hey, I agree with Jen, It's Hayden Christensen for heaven's sake! He's so nice just to watch on the big screen, who cares about anything else?
I don't understand the premise. Shadows can't exist without light, so it seems to me that these Shadow creatures or whatever should come out in the daytime, or wherever there is light. Seems to me that darkness, in which shadows disappear, should be the safety for these protagonists.