BLOGS
I'd open this review by asking why we need a remake of a 30-year-old Dudley Moore movie starring literally anyone -- let alone starring the relentlessly annoying Russell Brand -- but I think that we all agree, without question, that we do not need this movie. But nevertheless, it exists, and it's Friday, so we must address just how bone-crushingly boring, pointless, stupid and wasteful of a perfectly good supporting cast talent it is.
Arthur Bach is the sole heir to a billion-dollar fortune. Since he's never had to work, and he clearly has some developmental disabilities that have gone untreated, he spends his days like a drunk toddler, downing champagne, vrooming a Batmobile all over Manhattan and not understanding very basic things about the world, like what a refrigerator is or what Grand Central Station is. His mother would like him to marry the cold, calculating businesswoman Susan (my beloved Jennifer Garner, who continues to kill me with her awful movie choices), but he doesn't want to because Susan is mean. He'd rather be with Naomi (mumblecore veteran Greta Gerwig), who is poor and writes stories about the Statue of Liberty being best friends with the Chrysler Building. Naomi's not quite as mentally deficient as Arthur is, but you can see why he likes her, if you know what I'm saying. There is also Helen fricking Mirren, who plays Arthur's nanny, and it's just so undignified I can't even discuss it, honestly. Not to mention the offensive waste of a good Luis Guzman as Arthur's chauffer. What the hell is anyone other than Russell Brand doing in this movie? I hope to god the money was good.
So blah, blah, blah, Arthur's mother threatens to cut him off if he doesn't marry Susan, he rebels, Naomi finds out about Susan, she gets mad, they break up, they get back together, Arthur becomes a better person, rote, rote, rote, formula, formula, formula. The entire movie is more of a platform for Russell Brand to deliver a series of one-liners while shirtless than it is an actual movie, and though I will admit to laughing at a few of them, they don't warrant a two-hour film. This new Arthur isn't significant enough to make Dudley Moore roll over in his grave, but it is bad enough to be akin to a tiny stick jabbing his corpse. It's annoying, but ultimately it's so pathetically weak you almost feel sorry for it.
Tell us what you thought of Arthur in the comments, then see our list of the most eccentric movie billionaires ever!
Sponsored Links
8 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, January 6, 2011
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Indie Snapshot: The Iron Lady, Pariah and A Separation
TWoP 10: Reality Franchises That Should Be Benched
Friday, January 6, 2012: Supernatural
Portlandia is 2 Broke Girls for the Discerning Viewer's Soul
Today's TWoP News: Thursday, January 5, 2012
Modern Family: The Best Lines From the Winter Premiere
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
January 2012
2 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
I'm actually really excited for this, but I'm a Russell Brand fan, so what do I know.
I liked the movie, but I also love Russell Brand. And Helen Mirren. And the Batmobile.
I don't understand the hate for Russell Brand from the TWOP staffers. Surely he's no more annoying than the likes of Adam Sandler.
Look, I like Russell Brand. My Booky Wook is positively hilarious, and he stole Forgetting Sarah Marshall blind. That does NOT mean Arthur is any good. Because you know what? I didn't think it was. Unfortunately for everybody in it. So it doesn't matter if the reviewer likes or doesn't like Russell Brand. She didn't like the movie, and she gave ample reasons why, all of which I happen to agree with.
I really liked it. If you're not in the mood for a huge serving of fantasy wish fulfilment with a bit of redemption on the side, then this isn't going to work for you. On the other hand, if you don't mind that sort of thing, there's plenty to laugh at and enjoy here.
Adam Sandler is by far more annoying. In fairness, though, I don't recall waves of love for Sandler ever coming from here either.
I saw this movie yesterday and I remember seeing it 30 years ago The reviewer, obviously, never saw the original since the remake barely veers from the first one. The only difference was this Arthur got sober. But almost every plot point remained the same.
They subbed the batmobile for Dudley Moore's vintage convertible and his butler is now his nanny. They gave J.Garner"s character more lines but the sociopathic father-in-law was still there.
If there's any criticism it would be that they didn't really "re-make" it.
As pointless and ill-concieved as the Arthur remake was (even with a solid cast), don't forget the SEQUEL to Arthur (Arthur 2: On the Rocks...UGH!) was no less dismal and unworthy of the original...