BLOGS
Source Code is meant to be director Duncan Jones' mainstream follow-up to Moon, 2009's existential sci-fi critical darling, and though it has all the hallmarks of the work of a previously proven director transitioning into blockbuster territory -- plot holes galore, bad dialogue, flimsily supported themes, a sci-fi premise supported by nonexistent science, a crack screenplay written by someone hot off of direct-to-DVD sequel Species III -- the majority of critics are still filing positive reviews for it. Back-handed ones, but still, predominantly positive reviews. Personally, though I liked Moon a great deal and am rooting for Duncan Jones just as much as the next critic, Source Code really didn't work for me. No hard feelings, Mr. Moon-maker.
The titular "Source Code" is a military program in which severely wounded soldier Colter Stevens' (Jake Gyllenhaal) consciousness is sent back in time, into the body of a victim of a train bombing for the last eight minutes of his life. The goal is to use those eight minutes to determine who the bomber is, based on... people looking shifty, and/or people looking Middle Eastern, basically. Obviously, eight minutes isn't really sufficient time to solve a crime of that magnitude, so a confused Colter is Groundhog Day'd back into those eight minutes over and over and over again against his will, until by process of elimination he is able to find the bomber. Along the way, he falls in love with his avatar's seatmate (Michelle Monaghan) and even finds the time to call his estranged father to tell him (in his avatar's voice) that Colter loved him. Aww.
As the story goes on, Colter's focus is split between his duty to find the bomber and his growing personal commitment to save his new crush. But can he do both? Can he go back in time to save a girl who's already dead (and who thinks he is someone else entirely) by somehow creating an alternate universe where they both can live happily ever after together through sheer force of crush butterflies? The movie prides itself on that being a very interesting conundrum, and many people clearly have found that it is, but for me, it was laughably sappy, and it was bad sci-fi writing.
All of the sci-fi in the movie is explained away in bad mad-scientist clichés from the Source Code's vaguely evil creator (played by Jeffrey Wright), who, when asked by Colter how such a thing is possible, just kind of rambles on in egregiously amateurish "Well, the universe is elastic" inanities. The movie wants all the fun of time travel (and all the cool train explosions that come with it!) without having to deal with any of the intelligence good sci-fi requires, and every step of the way it's lazy and cheap. Even the overarching themes -- the military is evil and exploitative of its soldiers; love conquers all; the human cost of playing God; don't be racist about dark-skinned people (they might not all be terrorists, apparently) -- are weakly held up by two-dimensional characters and a sheer absence of a logical, well-written foundation of any kind. But hey, explosions sure are fun, and this movie has like 50 of them. It's the best movie of the year!
Tell us what you thought of Source Code, then see our list of the best and worst time travel movies ever!
What are people saying about your favorite shows and stars right now? Find out with Talk Without Pity, the social media site for real TV fans. See Tweets and Facebook comments in real time and add your own -- all without leaving TWoP. Join the conversation now!
Sponsored Links
4 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, May 11, 2012
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Trailers Without Pity: Prometheus
Parks and Recreation: Who Made the Comedy Grade Last Night?
Community: We All Go a Little Mad Sometimes
TWoP 10: Worst Moms on TV This Season
Friday, May 11, 2012: Fringe
Today's TWoP News: Thursday, May 10, 2012
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
May 2012
6 Entries
April 2012
22 Entries
March 2012
26 Entries
February 2012
24 Entries
January 2012
25 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
Fair enough, guess I'll go watch Insidious instead. ^_^
This movie is ,in essence,running in place.
It moves very fast without going anywhere.
"SOURCE CODE" sounds vaguely similar to a movie Keanu Reeves did awhile back("Chain Reaction",I think it was),and his presence could have helped this movie better than Gyllenhall did.
Had the producers taken a lot more effort to flesh out the character and plot details,this movie would have looked almost like a first cousin to "The Adjustment Bureau".
As it is,it's just a low-budget thrill ride.
This movie is great and this is jake gyllenhals best performance so far.best movie i have ever seen.
esto no tiene los anГЎlogos?
http://www.sextf.com/
roy