Transformers: Dark of the Moon: Oh, the Humanity!

In the run-up to the release of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, the third entry in the feature film franchise based on the old Hasbro toy line, director Michael Bay has been telling anyone who'll listen that the new film won't commit the sins of its predecessor, the widely loathed Revenge of the Fallen. From where I sat though, Dark of the Moon played like more of the same: a largely incoherent assembly of eardrum-shattering, chaotically-choreographed action sequences that are occasionally interrupted by hilariously campy dramatic moments and painfully unfunny bits of "comedy," as well as a few randomly inserted slow-mo money shots of one of the interchangeable CGI-robots actually transforming in a desperate attempt to make the audience think they're having a good time.

To be fair, there are a few obvious differences between the two movies. For one thing, Megan Fox is no longer flashing her cleavage, legs and hair like some kind of show pony as the love interest/arm candy of returning hero Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf). That role is now filled by Victoria's Secret model Rose Huntington-Whitelely and the best thing you can say about her performance is that she approaches the movie like one of her lingerie shoots. (Our first glimpse of her is a close-up of her perfectly-toned ass in tight panties, which tells you everything you need to know about Bay's attitude towards her character.) And where Fallen sent the Transformers abroad to wreck famous locations around the globe, the majority of the destruction in Moon takes place on U.S. soil, with D.C. and Chicago both getting trashed in the ongoing battle between the good-guy Autobots and the evil Decepticons. (One would think that, given the title, the moon would play a bigger role in the movie, but it simply serves to set what little story there is in motion and then ceases to be a factor for the rest of the super-sized 157-minute runtime.) Otherwise though, Moon feels like less of a continuation of Fallen than a glorified repeat.

I suppose some kind of plot synopsis is in order, so here goes: It's been about four years since the last Transformers throwdown that left Egypt's great Pyramids smoldering ruins and sent Decepticon leader Megatron into hiding. Optimus Prime and his merry band of Autobots are serving as robotic soldiers for the U.S. government, attacking foreign hot spots -- like a random "Illegal Nuclear Site" in the Middle East (I'm not kidding, that's exactly how the location is identified onscreen) -- so that our human forces don't have to. Meanwhile, Sam is pounding the pavement in D.C. searching for a job, his college diploma in one hand and a medal of honor from President Obama in the other. Like so many university graduates though, he's having a hard time finding a steady gig, which annoys his overbearing parents (Julie White and Kevin Dunn, reprising their roles as the most annoying Mom and Dad in movie history) and causes a rift between him and his gainfully employed girlfriend Carly (Huntington-Whiteley). After a full day of botched interviews, Sam finally lucks into a mailroom position at some kind of a phlebotinum-producing technology company headed up by alpha male Bruce Bazos (the always bizarre John Malkovich, doing some kind of Dubya-meets-Rush Limbaugh impression).

Since Transformers-related trouble is never very far away, no sooner has Sam started his new job than he once again finds himself a Decepticon target. In his latest bid to regain power, Megatron has conspired to lead the Autobots and their human allies to a ruined ship on the dark side of the Moon, where they discover the lifeless body of their former leader, Sentinel Prime (voiced by Leonard Nimoy), who carries with him a powerful device that can transport the ruined Transformer homeworld Cybertron into Earth's orbit. Always a trusting soul, Optimus revives Sentinel only to pay for that choice when his fellow Prime reveals his true intentions. As for Sam, he has his own betrayal to deal with -- it seems that Carly's hotshot billionaire boss (Patrick Dempsey) is in league with Megatron and he kidnaps the girl in order to force Witwicky to spy on his robot pals. Eventually, all of the characters end up in the Windy City for the grand finale in which a small legion of Autobots takes on the better-armed Decepticon forces while Sam mounts a seat-of-his-pants rescue mission to save Carly.

Since this is likely Bay's final Transformers outing, he focuses all his energy on making the siege of Chicago -- which eats up roughly an hour of screentime -- the loudest, busiest, most freakin' awesome set-piece he's ever directed. He gets the first two things right. The volume is cranked up to 11 and virtually every frame is filled with exploding buildings, robots and people. It's blockbuster action done on a giant, budget-busting scale, but here's the thing: none of it is actually all that exciting.

In fact, as the battle goes on (and on... and on... ), the spectacle becomes less... well, spectacular. Bay's status as an action maestro has always been a topic of much debate, with his fans hailing his admittedly impressive ability to build kick-ass, splash-page-like beats into bigger set-pieces, and his detractors correctly calling him out for poor geography and jumbled editing. Bay had too much money and technology at his disposable to not come up with a few of his patented killer moments, most notably a great bit where Sam is riding shotgun in his best friend/personal vehicle Bumblebee and the Autobot throws his rider free just as he transforms into his robot self to avoid a Decepticon attack. Then just before Sam becomes street pizza, Bumblebee catches him and pulls him to his chest as he switches back into car form. Did I mention that all of this happens in slow-motion? It's a terrific beat, one that's sure to get audiences cheering, but frankly, it's also the kind of standout moment that the final battle could use more of. Bay exhausts his bag of tricks relatively early in the Chicago siege and then allows the sequence to grind on in a repetitive jumble of explosions and gunfire. At a certain point, he even gives up trying to keep track of where the various characters are supposed to be in relation to each other, instead just allowing them to turn up when they're needed regardless of whether they were previously down the block or across town.

Watching the Decepticons casually obliterate Chicago's screaming citizenry, something that has always bugged me about the Transformers movies snapped into focus. Over the course of these three films, Bay has steadily seemed to lose his interest in humanity. Granted, he was never one for deep character pieces, but his earliest films -- particularly 1996's The Rock, which remains the best thing he's ever directed -- derive much of their charge from the clashing personalities of the flesh-and-blood people at their center. Likewise, the first Transformers famously hung its spectacle around the all-too-human story of an eager boy getting his first car. This one pretends to be about Sam's entry into adulthood, but it's all too clear that Bay and screenwriter Ehren Kruger could care less about him and the rest of the human characters. They're merely cannon fodder to be moved in and out of the various Transformers' lines of fire. The movie's complete disinterest in anything resembling human emotion isn't just off-putting, it's downright depressing.

Perhaps realizing his director's attention is elsewhere, LaBeouf seizes the opportunity to turn in his weirdest, most obnoxious performance to date. Stalking around the screen, shouting -- rather than speaking -- much of his dialogue, Sam often comes across as mentally unhinged. It's as if the actor is actively trying to turn the audience against him so he'll never have to make one of these movies again. I felt his pain. When the credits finally rolled, I found myself breathing a sigh of relief that our long national nightmare of having to endure another Michael Bay-directed Transformers movie may well and truly be over. Happy Independence Day.

Never mind Michael Bay vs. Megan Fox, here are the most infamous public brawls between movie stars and directors.

It's Tubey Time! Make sure that your favorite shows, actors, reality stars and characters get the recognition they deserve by voting in our annual Tubey awards. It's where fans have total control over what rates as the best and worst of the past year in a variety of categories. Vote now!

11 Comments

June 30, 2011 12:52 PM
Kendall
Reply

"...Bay and screenwriter Ehren Kruger could care less about him and the rest of the human characters."

I hate to be "that guy", but this should be "could not care less".

June 30, 2011 1:05 PM
cdredhead
Reply

C'mon guys...for professional writers, you screw up the grammar quite often.

"...Ehren Kruger could care less about him and..."

It's couldN'T care less. Back in the days of excellent writing, one of the recappers would practically cry whenever someone made that mistake on The West Wing. I miss those days.

July 1, 2011 6:26 AM
cypher
Reply

i hate film critics, they dont know how to review an action movie about robots. Its not supposed to be quiet, its not supposed to be this grandios story, its not supposed to make you think. |ITS A MOVIE ABOUT BIG ASS ROBOTS KICKING THE CRAP OUT OF OTHER BIG ASS ROBOTS, flash a nice ass for the fan boys, get some silly humor in there, for some relief, I mean, i heard the theater laughing, i dont know where you're from, maybe you are all born without a sense of humor, I dont know. I for one like leaving my brain at the door when i go to an action adventure movie, because I already have to think all day long at work and at home with the wife and kids, Why the hell would I wanna think at a ass kicking robot movie. Call me stupid I guess.

July 1, 2011 8:22 AM
OrangeCrush
Reply

I agree Cyper, your stupid. The whole "I dont want to think at action movies" is quite frankly the lamest BS excuse for crappy movies I have ever seen. A quality script that actually makes someone think and become emotionally invested in a movie is ALWAYS preferable to a movie that is so cookie cutter that you dont have to use a single brain cell while watching the film. You hear people sprouting BS lines like that all the time. "I dont want to think. I do that all day long at work.", "If I want to think, Ill go see a drama", etc. Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.

This reviewer is actually spot on. The Rock is easily Bay's best film to date and while he may be one of the best at action sequences, he is utterly clueless when it actually comes down to directing people and dont even get me started on just how bad he is in the editing room.

As for the film itself, once again this reviewer is spot on. Its Revenge of the Fallen all over again. Its definitely time to pass this movie franchise on to a new director. Maybe then we can actually get back to what made this original film so great, the human element.

July 1, 2011 11:32 AM
yb125
Reply

I think the issue for the reveiwer is that despite "the action" it is still boring. I took my younger brother to see the second and we were bored to death, we almost walked out of the thing. To see that this one is over 2 and a half hours long?

July 3, 2011 11:41 AM
ds
Reply

I saw transformes 3 and i loved it, even more than the 1st one.

July 3, 2011 5:36 PM
corvus13
Reply

Was I thoroughly lost in the fitst battle scene when the Decepticons go after Sentinel Prime on the freeway? I THOUGHT they said the attack was taking place on the Capital Beltway outside Washington, where all of the rest of the action had been taking place up to that moment (except for the diversion to Iran), but the freeway signs clearly said Interstate 88, which is in the Chicago area, where the final battle occurs. Were they really lost, or what?

July 5, 2011 7:00 AM
Shaun
Reply
replied to comment from OrangeCrush

It's "you're stupid" as in "you are stupid", not "your" stupid. Please understand the difference.

July 8, 2011 9:01 AM
Emma
Reply

Watched it and thought is was ok. The editing toward the end was terrible though, it seemed like he had messed up the sequence of who arrived when where and how. Annoyed me. Just a big brash summer action film.

July 14, 2011 11:53 AM
Toya
Reply

My one complaint of Transformers 3 was the lack of Megan Fox. Sad as it may sound to some I actually missed her a lot. I felt that Rose was trying to hard. With that being said I loved the movie. It was just want I wanted in an action movie. Not sure why everyone is hating on the script and the actors but I thought it was a good end to a great series.

October 13, 2011 9:53 AM
Bob
Reply
replied to comment from OrangeCrush

sex - activities associated with sexual intercourse and is random

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Moviefile

January 2012

2 Entries

December 2011

27 Entries

November 2011

22 Entries

October 2011

22 Entries

September 2011

29 Entries

August 2011

27 Entries

July 2011

30 Entries

June 2011

25 Entries

May 2011

13 Entries

April 2011

23 Entries

March 2011

22 Entries

February 2011

33 Entries

January 2011

39 Entries

December 2010

21 Entries

November 2010

29 Entries

October 2010

23 Entries

September 2010

25 Entries

August 2010

26 Entries

July 2010

29 Entries

June 2010

36 Entries

May 2010

22 Entries

April 2010

26 Entries

March 2010

30 Entries

February 2010

19 Entries

January 2010

19 Entries

December 2009

15 Entries

November 2009

21 Entries

October 2009

27 Entries

September 2009

30 Entries

August 2009

28 Entries

July 2009

34 Entries

June 2009

27 Entries

May 2009

24 Entries

April 2009

23 Entries

March 2009

18 Entries

February 2009

30 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

61 Entries

October 2008

102 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

99 Entries

July 2008

116 Entries

June 2008

95 Entries

May 2008

86 Entries

April 2008

67 Entries

March 2008

14 Entries