Fright Night: Warning! This Remake Bites

The late '70s and early '80s were a boom time for cheap horror movies as the big Hollywood studios and independent producers churned out dozens upon dozens of low-budget pictures that featured attractive casts of teenagers getting summarily slaughtered by serial killers, zombies, vampires and other assorted monsters. Today, those titles have provided the industry with plenty of remake fodder to fill up multiplexes on otherwise slow weekends. In the past few years, we've been treated to remakes of everything from Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street to Prom Night and My Bloody Valentine. (Anyone wanna bet how long it'll be until we're buying tickets to new versions of Chopping Mall, April Fool's Day and Night of the Creeps?) So it was only a matter of time until someone got around to Fright Night, Tom Holland's fondly remembered 1985 tale of a suburban teen (William Ragsdale) who discovers that the guy next door (Chris Sarandon) is a literal bloodsucker.

The best thing that can be said about this new Fright Night is that the film is at least self-aware enough to recognize that its existence is entirely superfluous and thus goes about its bloody business with a cheerful efficiency that can be entertaining if you don't sweat details like consistent characterizations, logical storytelling and a satisfying ending. Holland's original script was revised and updated by Marti Noxon, formerly of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and her previous experience with the undead manifests itself most obviously in the way the characters regularly reference other famous vamps (including Dracula and, of course, the whole Twilight thing) and recap the rules for killing the creature or, at least, keeping them at bay. It's stated quite often, for example, that Fright Night's central fanged demon Jerry (Colin Farrell), can't enter a house if he's not first invited in. This sets up one of the movie's most effective scenes in which our hero Charley (Anton Yelchin) grabs a couple of beers for his neighbor while Jerry looms in the patio doorway, just waiting for the kid to slip up and allow him to cross the welcome mat. (The resourceful vampire later finds a way around the whole "being invited in" thing by burning Charley's house down, a move that -- while extreme -- is also pretty damn clever.)

Like its predecessor, Fright Night Redux wastes little time revealing Jerry's addiction to blood. With that mystery out of the way, the film's first act establishes an intriguing dilemma for Charley. A former nerd -- one who even engaged in backyard LARP battles for goodness sake -- he's since made himself over into a fashion-conscious cool dude, acquiring a hot girlfriend, Amy (Imogen Poots), a pair of dumb, but popular pals (Dave Franco and Modern Family's Reid Ewing) and a room that's now free of Star Wars posters and Lord of the Rings memorabilia. But his geek past still nips at his feels in the form of one-time best friend Ed (Christopher Mintz-Plasse, who seems doomed to play high-school students well into his 40's), the first person to get clued into the fact that Jerry is far more than the handsome stud next door. Does Charley align himself with Ed and risk exposing his inner nerd to Amy? Or does he do the cool thing and not care that his girlfriend and mom (Toni Collette) might fall prey to Jerry's considerable charms?

No sooner has the movie proposed this conundrum, than it promptly abandons it -- and really any attempt at an interesting narrative -- for a series of set-pieces that pit Charley and his various allies (including Amy, Mom and a Criss Angel-type rock star magician named Peter Vincent, hilariously embodied by none other than The Doctor himself, David Tennant), against an increasingly aggressive Jerry. (Seriously, how is this guy supposed to have survived in secret for 400 years? He's easily the least subtle vampire in the history of cinematic vampirism.) Some of these sequences are quite well done, most notably a bit where Charley attempts to lead one of Jerry's victims out of his house while the off-duty vamp lounges in his living room catching up on some Real Housewives of New Jersey action. Cleverly staged by director Craig Gillespie (whose previous credits include the decidedly non-horror features Lars and the Real Girl and Mr. Woodcock... although the latter could be described as terrifyingly awful) effectively turns an ordinary split-level suburban home into a potential death trap. But the majority of them are marred by the same whiplash cutting and overemphasis on digitally enhanced effects that plague too many mid-level studio productions these days. (Gillespie also earns a slap on the wrist for going overboard on the eye-poking 3D gags; it's funny the first time that blood leaps off the screen -- by the second, third and fourth times, it's just annoying.)

The stars are able to keep the tedium at bay for a little while. Yelchin is a winning screen presence -- he's got some of the same boyish enthusiasm Shia LaBeouf displayed before he went to seed -- Tennant is a hoot and a half and Farrell's having such a good time, he can barely stop grinning. (As for Poots and Collette... well, they both look great! It's a shame somebody forgot to write actual characters for them.) Inevitably though, they run out of ways to distract us from the film's crushing mediocrity and general blandness. Whenever the movie seems on the verge of making a genuinely bold creative choice, Noxon (or, to be fair, the uncredited scribes that undoubtedly "polished" the screenplay during production) instead opts for the safe, generic route. If Fright Night feels overly familiar, that's not just because it's a remake -- it's also because the movie resembles every other junky horror programmer released in the past decade.

It's Tubey Time! Make sure that your favorite shows, actors, reality stars and characters get the recognition they deserve by voting in our annual Tubey awards. It's where fans have total control over what rates as the best and worst of the past year in a variety of categories. Vote now!

6 Comments

August 19, 2011 1:53 PM
Jeff
Reply

I could tell this was going to be crappy by one scene in the trailer.

In the original, Sarandon opens the window to show Ragsdale a hot woman looking at him. Sarandon takes off her top and slowly and deliberately, bites into her so she dies still looking across the street. It's a seductive and memorable scene.

In the remake, the girl has her back to Yelchin, and the bite is savage and violent. They thoroughly missed the point on that crucial scene.

No thanks

August 19, 2011 5:27 PM
Caitlin
Reply

Aww, I actually enjoyed this one. As long as you go into it knowing it's going to be totally ridiculous and over-the-top and not expecting a typical horror movie experience, it's a fun bit of escapism. Then again, perhaps my overwhelming love of David Tennant and his campy outfits has persuaded me to be less discerning, who knows.

August 20, 2011 5:53 AM
Chanda
Reply

I couldn't take this review seriously. April Fool's Day has already been remade. This was a good movie (probably a B+ effort), with some genuine terror and camp, in almost equal measures. The acting chops of the various individuals (Yelchin, Farrell, Tennant, Collette, etc) allow the movie some leeway in how it's structured. I thought it was great.

Just don't go see it in 3-D, I do agree with that. I saw it in 2-D and I didn't see anything that I missed with 3-D and I didn't pay extra or have to struggle to see stuff (like I did in Harry Potter!)

August 20, 2011 5:59 AM
Chanda
Reply

Okay, hope the second time is the charm for posting this comment.

First, I am bugged by the reviewer saying that April Fool's Day will probably be remade soon. It WAS remade already.

Second, Jeff up above, the difference is in the character - in the first movie, Sarandon was seductive - he tried to keep young Ragsdale involved in the sex appeal. In the new version, Farrell doesn't realize he's being watched, honestly, and anyway, Yelchin is playing a high school dude, so...maybe it's better this way? Plus, Colin remains a creeeeeeeepy vampire, not a seductive one. So, they moved the camp over to other places (the role playing that took place before the movie started, for instance).

With a couple of scenes that annoyed me for realism sake (grass in Las Vegas???? and a burning house that nobody calls the fire department on? - unless the abandoned houses really are mostly abandoned??)

But the movie, when seen in 2-D, is a solid B+ effort. I enjoyed it, the acting was great - much better than the first one, honestly. Anton, Colin, David, and Toni were all good, in varying degrees of the sizes of their roles/characterizations.

I enjoyed it and look forward to it coming out on Blu Ray, non-3d. :)

August 22, 2011 1:30 PM
wayne martin
Reply

Loved Fright night? Check out the casts shared ipod list http://bit.ly/r4wI1h

August 22, 2011 1:30 PM
wayne martin
Reply

Loved Fright night? Check out the casts shared ipod list http://bit.ly/r4wI1h

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Moviefile

May 2012

6 Entries

April 2012

22 Entries

March 2012

26 Entries

February 2012

24 Entries

January 2012

25 Entries

December 2011

27 Entries

November 2011

22 Entries

October 2011

22 Entries

September 2011

29 Entries

August 2011

27 Entries

July 2011

30 Entries

June 2011

25 Entries

May 2011

13 Entries

April 2011

23 Entries

March 2011

22 Entries

February 2011

33 Entries

January 2011

39 Entries

December 2010

21 Entries

November 2010

29 Entries

October 2010

23 Entries

September 2010

25 Entries

August 2010

26 Entries

July 2010

29 Entries

June 2010

36 Entries

May 2010

22 Entries

April 2010

26 Entries

March 2010

30 Entries

February 2010

19 Entries

January 2010

19 Entries

December 2009

15 Entries

November 2009

21 Entries

October 2009

27 Entries

September 2009

30 Entries

August 2009

28 Entries

July 2009

34 Entries

June 2009

27 Entries

May 2009

24 Entries

April 2009

23 Entries

March 2009

18 Entries

February 2009

30 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

61 Entries

October 2008

102 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

99 Entries

July 2008

116 Entries

June 2008

95 Entries

May 2008

86 Entries

April 2008

67 Entries

March 2008

14 Entries