Rise of the Planet of the Apes: You Finally Made a Monkey out of Me

Full disclosure: I, like many of the people who will go to see Rise of the Planet of the Apes this weekend, have never actually seen an entire Apes film from start to finish. I have, however, watched the famous clips, know the plotlines and have all of the Simpsons references committed to memory. I tell you this because instead of going into this film as a fan of the franchise, I wanted to view it more as standalone summer blockbuster. I believe that even if I was a diehard Aper (that's what y'all are called, right?), I wouldn't feel a substantial amount of yearning to know the complete origin story of exactly how the apes came to take over earth by the year 3978 -- or, I suppose, 5021, if you're a Tim Burton fan . The premise makes sense and everything as a movie, but it can also just be summed up in two words: crazy science.

The film stars James Franco as Will Rodman, a San Francisco-based scientist determined to use genetic engineering to find a cure for Alzheimer's Disease, the very form of dementia his father (John Lithgow) is suffering from. The super-slick, super-evil lab he works at tests on apes, but when their top chimpanzee goes on a bender of sorts, the experimentation is shut down and the lab crew gets the order to put down all of their chimps. James Franco is convinced to secretly take home a baby chimp -- a decision that he never has to suffer any repercussions for throughout the film, including getting in trouble with his job or the police, and which his girlfriend doesn't seem to question until they had been dating for five years. He names the chimp Caesar, raises him like a son and has him wear a shirt at all times. Did I mention that the chimp is super smart because his mother was injected with a crazy genetic formula that makes brain cells repair and reproduce at enormous speeds? Also receiving the formula: Rodman's dad. This will end well, right?

There are plot points of the movie that I wouldn't exactly call twists, but they are slightly interesting and successfully function in forwarding the action in a reasonable way. Example: We learn that Rodman's magic snake oil isn't strong enough to repair the brain forever, but that if you make it too strong, it can kill a person -- emphasis on person. Apes' immune systems are much stronger than humans' (in the reality of the film and in real life), so they never feel any pesky negative effects, like, say, death.

I think the most unexpected thing about Rise of the Planet of the Apes is how horribly, and might I add, accurately (yeah, yeah, I love creatures), the film portrays animal testing. There's no mercy or exaggeration in how lab chimpanzees are treated, and then when Caesar lands himself in a horribly-run ape "sanctuary," it's a pretty true representation of those terrible stories you hear about animal cruelty in those kind of places. And I believe we're always supposed to be rooting for the apes here, as the two main villains are the people who care the least about the well-being of the animals: Rodman's I-don't-care-how-many-chimps-you-have-to-kill-just-get-the-money boss (David Oyelowo) and the evil ape handler (Draco Malfoy himself, Tom Felton), who gets to say the entire line, "Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape."

For a summer blockbuster, I did not go in expecting such a strong pro-animal message. You feel the camaraderie of the apes and end up blaming humans for the eventual destruction of their own planet. While this message does stay true to the original films, it's just way more political than your average mid-August flick.

All this is not to say the movie is really good. It was terrible, save for the parts where you got to watch the apes get smarter. But it's improbable that so many apes live in modern-day San Francisco that they could easily overrun the entire city. The pacing is extremely inconsistent, the sci-fi clichés are plentiful, the message is depressing and the comic relief is nonexistent. If you want to see James Franco act in a role basically born for Nicolas Cage, a pretty decent use of CGI and an enjoyable epilogue scene, then sure, go see this. Otherwise, save yourself the trouble and re-watch "A Fish Called Selma" for the Planet of the Apes musical, because this shit is b-a-n-a-n-a-s.

For some moviegoers, is this movie really just another excuse to wallow in geek nostalgia? Our vloggers discuss in this video:

It's Tubey time! Make sure that your favorite shows, actors, reality stars and characters get the recognition they deserve by voting in our annual Tubey awards. It's where fans have total control over what rates as the best and worst of the past year in a variety of categories. Vote now!

14 Comments

August 5, 2011 11:50 AM
ltg
Reply

At least the original series tried to come up with a reason there are so many apes around -- a mysterious disease had killed all cats and dogs, so people had taken to keeping apes. First they were kept as pets, and eventually they were kept as slaves after humans realized how good they were at menial work. So by the time their own Caesar comes along, the apes had benefitted from several generations of human-supported breeding.

August 5, 2011 12:59 PM
gazzamalloo
Reply

I'm just wondering about the merchandizing... as I'd like to get the Draco Malfoy doll with audio.

August 5, 2011 6:59 PM
egghead
Reply

So...they applied Deep Blue Sea to POTA?

August 6, 2011 7:18 AM
Amy
Reply
replied to comment from egghead

That's pretty much what I'm thinking. When I first heard the plot, I assumed they had just gone, "People liked Deep Blue Sea, and Planet of the Apes, so let's combine them."

August 6, 2011 12:30 PM
Diogenes
Reply

They explain it in this movie too. The humans are killed by a plague, while a breeding population of intelligent apes survives in the Redwood Forest.

I thought the movie was engrossing and entertaining. My theater (at Mall of America) was really into it and cheering the apes. Malfoy's "...damn dirty ape" line got a chuckle, but Caesar's reaction took the oof off the joint.

The motion capture performance by Andy Serkis is amazing, by the way.

August 6, 2011 12:31 PM
Diogenes
Reply

They explain it in this movie too. The humans are killed by a plague, while a breeding population of intelligent apes survives in the Redwood Forest.

I thought the movie was engrossing and entertaining. My theater (at Mall of America) was really into it and cheering the apes. Malfoy's "...damn dirty ape" line got a chuckle, but Caesar's reaction took the oof off the joint.

The motion capture performance by Andy Serkis is amazing, by the way.

August 6, 2011 7:58 PM
sanfran_native
Reply

I watched it at the san francisco centre mall and the crowd loved it as well. I don't really understand the main criticisms...animal testing is prevalant so why does it have to be compared negatively to deep blue sea? Obviously messing with the brain of any species will produce pos or neg reprecussions. Is dps the owner of alzheimers based research? Should they have chosen another brain degenerative illness?...the "so many apes" comment...well sf is a hub of several research facilities and animal zoos and sanctuaries so I don't see how its far fetched from a movie standpoint when sf is a city of 7 square miles and less than 1 million population. Muir woods is real and huge, marin county offers an extreme out of outdoor space. The 113 virus kills humans in a matter of weeks, so while the apes flourish, humans die off.

August 6, 2011 11:45 PM
On the other hand...
Reply

How much respect can I have for a "movie reviewer" who admits up front that they have never seen so much as ONE of the classic 'Apes' films start to finish? Pretty sad.

August 7, 2011 1:05 AM
Jessica
Reply

The movie was engrossing and entertaining, and - just to reiterate what some others have pointed out - there is an explanation for how only a hundred or so apes eventually overrun the city. It's one thing to give a lukewarm review, but saying a movie which is currently 81% certified fresh is "terrible" while making arguments that prove you weren't paying attention to pivotal plot points makes me doubt you expertise.

August 7, 2011 4:00 PM
Craig
Reply
replied to comment from On the other hand...

No kidding. I'm still reeling from the reviewer panning the film because "the message is depressing" and "the comic relief is non-existent". This is why movies are constantly being dumbed down to appeal to the mouthbreather crowd: "ALL GOOD MOVIES HAVE HAPPY ENDINGS! AND WACKY SIDEKICKS!"

August 8, 2011 11:33 AM
Caroline
Reply

so this reviewer's main criticism is that the movie wasn't STUPID enough for him?

August 10, 2011 9:30 PM
Dave
Reply
replied to comment from Craig

Well put sir. This was easily the best movie I saw all summer.

August 14, 2011 8:34 PM
Downunder Aper
Reply
replied to comment from ltg

The original movies were based on the book of the same name. Because of the expense of placing the ape civilisation within an 20th century context, it was decided to make them a more primitive agrarian culture far removed from the advances of the 20th century along with a suitable origin story of its own. The origin story in the book however parallels the movie Rise of the Planet of the Apes in many ways. So although they aren't exactly the same, you can say that the new movie is faithful to the book or blueprint of the POTA.

Another thing that "Apers" will appreciate are the many visual and audio references to scenes from all of the previous movies - Not expecting them I forgot to keep count, but there's a lot of them. For example, putting Rodman's I-don't-care-how-many-chimps-you-have-to-kill-just-get-the-money boss (David Oyelowo) in a long underground tunnel immediately reminded me of (Answer the phone) Mr MacDonald in a very familiar scene from Conquest of the POTA. So in some ways it was a nostalgic trip down memory lane for POTA loving geeks LOL.

And no, I never call myself an Aper or even thought to. Never heard the term used before today and will never use it again.

March 29, 2012 10:12 PM
Doniyor
Reply

You do realise that this is a fiationcl movie? Haha jokes. I'm looking forward to seeing this even though the trailer looks a little on the crap side. They should've stopped after the first movie, everything after has only served to milk the cash cow.What are your thoughts on the movie, morality aside?

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Moviefile

May 2012

14 Entries

April 2012

22 Entries

March 2012

26 Entries

February 2012

24 Entries

January 2012

25 Entries

December 2011

27 Entries

November 2011

22 Entries

October 2011

22 Entries

September 2011

29 Entries

August 2011

27 Entries

July 2011

30 Entries

June 2011

25 Entries

May 2011

13 Entries

April 2011

23 Entries

March 2011

22 Entries

February 2011

33 Entries

January 2011

39 Entries

December 2010

21 Entries

November 2010

29 Entries

October 2010

23 Entries

September 2010

25 Entries

August 2010

26 Entries

July 2010

29 Entries

June 2010

36 Entries

May 2010

22 Entries

April 2010

26 Entries

March 2010

30 Entries

February 2010

19 Entries

January 2010

19 Entries

December 2009

15 Entries

November 2009

21 Entries

October 2009

27 Entries

September 2009

30 Entries

August 2009

28 Entries

July 2009

34 Entries

June 2009

27 Entries

May 2009

24 Entries

April 2009

23 Entries

March 2009

18 Entries

February 2009

30 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

61 Entries

October 2008

102 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

99 Entries

July 2008

116 Entries

June 2008

95 Entries

May 2008

86 Entries

April 2008

67 Entries

March 2008

14 Entries