BLOGS
Full disclosure: I, like many of the people who will go to see Rise of the Planet of the Apes this weekend, have never actually seen an entire Apes film from start to finish. I have, however, watched the famous clips, know the plotlines and have all of the Simpsons references committed to memory. I tell you this because instead of going into this film as a fan of the franchise, I wanted to view it more as standalone summer blockbuster. I believe that even if I was a diehard Aper (that's what y'all are called, right?), I wouldn't feel a substantial amount of yearning to know the complete origin story of exactly how the apes came to take over earth by the year 3978 -- or, I suppose, 5021, if you're a Tim Burton fan . The premise makes sense and everything as a movie, but it can also just be summed up in two words: crazy science.
The film stars James Franco as Will Rodman, a San Francisco-based scientist determined to use genetic engineering to find a cure for Alzheimer's Disease, the very form of dementia his father (John Lithgow) is suffering from. The super-slick, super-evil lab he works at tests on apes, but when their top chimpanzee goes on a bender of sorts, the experimentation is shut down and the lab crew gets the order to put down all of their chimps. James Franco is convinced to secretly take home a baby chimp -- a decision that he never has to suffer any repercussions for throughout the film, including getting in trouble with his job or the police, and which his girlfriend doesn't seem to question until they had been dating for five years. He names the chimp Caesar, raises him like a son and has him wear a shirt at all times. Did I mention that the chimp is super smart because his mother was injected with a crazy genetic formula that makes brain cells repair and reproduce at enormous speeds? Also receiving the formula: Rodman's dad. This will end well, right?
There are plot points of the movie that I wouldn't exactly call twists, but they are slightly interesting and successfully function in forwarding the action in a reasonable way. Example: We learn that Rodman's magic snake oil isn't strong enough to repair the brain forever, but that if you make it too strong, it can kill a person -- emphasis on person. Apes' immune systems are much stronger than humans' (in the reality of the film and in real life), so they never feel any pesky negative effects, like, say, death.
I think the most unexpected thing about Rise of the Planet of the Apes is how horribly, and might I add, accurately (yeah, yeah, I love creatures), the film portrays animal testing. There's no mercy or exaggeration in how lab chimpanzees are treated, and then when Caesar lands himself in a horribly-run ape "sanctuary," it's a pretty true representation of those terrible stories you hear about animal cruelty in those kind of places. And I believe we're always supposed to be rooting for the apes here, as the two main villains are the people who care the least about the well-being of the animals: Rodman's I-don't-care-how-many-chimps-you-have-to-kill-just-get-the-money boss (David Oyelowo) and the evil ape handler (Draco Malfoy himself, Tom Felton), who gets to say the entire line, "Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape."
For a summer blockbuster, I did not go in expecting such a strong pro-animal message. You feel the camaraderie of the apes and end up blaming humans for the eventual destruction of their own planet. While this message does stay true to the original films, it's just way more political than your average mid-August flick.
All this is not to say the movie is really good. It was terrible, save for the parts where you got to watch the apes get smarter. But it's improbable that so many apes live in modern-day San Francisco that they could easily overrun the entire city. The pacing is extremely inconsistent, the sci-fi clichés are plentiful, the message is depressing and the comic relief is nonexistent. If you want to see James Franco act in a role basically born for Nicolas Cage, a pretty decent use of CGI and an enjoyable epilogue scene, then sure, go see this. Otherwise, save yourself the trouble and re-watch "A Fish Called Selma" for the Planet of the Apes musical, because this shit is b-a-n-a-n-a-s.
For some moviegoers, is this movie really just another excuse to wallow in geek nostalgia? Our vloggers discuss in this video:
It's Tubey time! Make sure that your favorite shows, actors, reality stars and characters get the recognition they deserve by voting in our annual Tubey awards. It's where fans have total control over what rates as the best and worst of the past year in a variety of categories. Vote now!
Sponsored Links
14 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, May 18, 2012
USA Network Upfront 2012: Characters, Extremely Defined Jawlines Still Welcome
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
Community: School's Out For Summer
TWoP 10: Most Promising New Shows of the 2012-2013 Season
Battleship: Your Burning Questions Answered
What To Expect When You're Expecting: Exactly What You'd Expect
Friday, May 18, 2012: Nikita
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Moviefile
May 2012
14 Entries
April 2012
22 Entries
March 2012
26 Entries
February 2012
24 Entries
January 2012
25 Entries
December 2011
27 Entries
November 2011
22 Entries
October 2011
22 Entries
September 2011
29 Entries
August 2011
27 Entries
July 2011
30 Entries
June 2011
25 Entries
May 2011
13 Entries
April 2011
23 Entries
March 2011
22 Entries
February 2011
33 Entries
January 2011
39 Entries
December 2010
21 Entries
November 2010
29 Entries
October 2010
23 Entries
September 2010
25 Entries
August 2010
26 Entries
July 2010
29 Entries
June 2010
36 Entries
May 2010
22 Entries
April 2010
26 Entries
March 2010
30 Entries
February 2010
19 Entries
January 2010
19 Entries
December 2009
15 Entries
November 2009
21 Entries
October 2009
27 Entries
September 2009
30 Entries
August 2009
28 Entries
July 2009
34 Entries
June 2009
27 Entries
May 2009
24 Entries
April 2009
23 Entries
March 2009
18 Entries
February 2009
30 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
61 Entries
October 2008
102 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
99 Entries
July 2008
116 Entries
June 2008
95 Entries
May 2008
86 Entries
April 2008
67 Entries
March 2008
14 Entries
At least the original series tried to come up with a reason there are so many apes around -- a mysterious disease had killed all cats and dogs, so people had taken to keeping apes. First they were kept as pets, and eventually they were kept as slaves after humans realized how good they were at menial work. So by the time their own Caesar comes along, the apes had benefitted from several generations of human-supported breeding.
I'm just wondering about the merchandizing... as I'd like to get the Draco Malfoy doll with audio.
So...they applied Deep Blue Sea to POTA?
That's pretty much what I'm thinking. When I first heard the plot, I assumed they had just gone, "People liked Deep Blue Sea, and Planet of the Apes, so let's combine them."
They explain it in this movie too. The humans are killed by a plague, while a breeding population of intelligent apes survives in the Redwood Forest.
I thought the movie was engrossing and entertaining. My theater (at Mall of America) was really into it and cheering the apes. Malfoy's "...damn dirty ape" line got a chuckle, but Caesar's reaction took the oof off the joint.
The motion capture performance by Andy Serkis is amazing, by the way.
They explain it in this movie too. The humans are killed by a plague, while a breeding population of intelligent apes survives in the Redwood Forest.
I thought the movie was engrossing and entertaining. My theater (at Mall of America) was really into it and cheering the apes. Malfoy's "...damn dirty ape" line got a chuckle, but Caesar's reaction took the oof off the joint.
The motion capture performance by Andy Serkis is amazing, by the way.
I watched it at the san francisco centre mall and the crowd loved it as well. I don't really understand the main criticisms...animal testing is prevalant so why does it have to be compared negatively to deep blue sea? Obviously messing with the brain of any species will produce pos or neg reprecussions. Is dps the owner of alzheimers based research? Should they have chosen another brain degenerative illness?...the "so many apes" comment...well sf is a hub of several research facilities and animal zoos and sanctuaries so I don't see how its far fetched from a movie standpoint when sf is a city of 7 square miles and less than 1 million population. Muir woods is real and huge, marin county offers an extreme out of outdoor space. The 113 virus kills humans in a matter of weeks, so while the apes flourish, humans die off.
How much respect can I have for a "movie reviewer" who admits up front that they have never seen so much as ONE of the classic 'Apes' films start to finish? Pretty sad.
The movie was engrossing and entertaining, and - just to reiterate what some others have pointed out - there is an explanation for how only a hundred or so apes eventually overrun the city. It's one thing to give a lukewarm review, but saying a movie which is currently 81% certified fresh is "terrible" while making arguments that prove you weren't paying attention to pivotal plot points makes me doubt you expertise.
No kidding. I'm still reeling from the reviewer panning the film because "the message is depressing" and "the comic relief is non-existent". This is why movies are constantly being dumbed down to appeal to the mouthbreather crowd: "ALL GOOD MOVIES HAVE HAPPY ENDINGS! AND WACKY SIDEKICKS!"
so this reviewer's main criticism is that the movie wasn't STUPID enough for him?
Well put sir. This was easily the best movie I saw all summer.
The original movies were based on the book of the same name. Because of the expense of placing the ape civilisation within an 20th century context, it was decided to make them a more primitive agrarian culture far removed from the advances of the 20th century along with a suitable origin story of its own. The origin story in the book however parallels the movie Rise of the Planet of the Apes in many ways. So although they aren't exactly the same, you can say that the new movie is faithful to the book or blueprint of the POTA.
Another thing that "Apers" will appreciate are the many visual and audio references to scenes from all of the previous movies - Not expecting them I forgot to keep count, but there's a lot of them. For example, putting Rodman's I-don't-care-how-many-chimps-you-have-to-kill-just-get-the-money boss (David Oyelowo) in a long underground tunnel immediately reminded me of (Answer the phone) Mr MacDonald in a very familiar scene from Conquest of the POTA. So in some ways it was a nostalgic trip down memory lane for POTA loving geeks LOL.
And no, I never call myself an Aper or even thought to. Never heard the term used before today and will never use it again.
You do realise that this is a fiationcl movie? Haha jokes. I'm looking forward to seeing this even though the trailer looks a little on the crap side. They should've stopped after the first movie, everything after has only served to milk the cash cow.What are your thoughts on the movie, morality aside?