BLOGS

Seven Things Heroes Needs to Do to Stop Sucking

by Angel Cohn October 13, 2008 12:28 PM
Seven Things Heroes Needs to Do to Stop Sucking

I like Heroes. Or at least in theory I do. But there's a point where even I have to draw the line. Last week was kind of that line. And while I really don't want to stop watching this show, I'd hate for it to devolve into Prison Break territory, where I'm only watching it to see what ludicrous and preposterous new things they've come up with. It would be easier for me to make a clean break. But I'm willing to give it a little more time. Especially if they make any of the following changes. Stat. Because I'm not falling for that "we made it better, we swear" thing again. Adding in a few cool twists in a mess of a show does not make things all better.

1. Stop Going to the Future!
At first it was cute. Have Hiro hop ahead, see the world in crisis, come back to figure out what to do about it. ("Save the cheerleader, Save the world!") But now, when there are full episodes devoted to future events that are never going to happen it is annoying, and a waste of time. With all of the characters zinging around and messing with the space-time continuum, it is hard to know, or care, what is going to happen, or if the heroes/villains are able to stop it bad things from happening, because it is a constant state of flux. Will Sylar have a kid named Noah? Possibly, but not if Peter travels back to the past and messes things up. Will Ando kill Hiro? Also possible, and with Hiro becoming stupider by the minute, it might be a welcome change of pace. And while Parkman really has nothing to do on this show, having him spirit walk (with the help of headphones) to envision himself with a kid and living with Daphne is just plain annoying and unnecessary. Just having him see the paintings would have been enough to give him a clue about his mission, or whatever. Instead, we get a wasted and pointless hour.

2. Stop Adding New Characters!
If the Maya debacle last year wasn't enough to annoy fans, now we've got more good and bad guys, despite the fact that some of the best people barely get their storylines dealt with in any kind of significant way. You could always spend more time with HRG in my book, and he's been just a shadow, and while I'm loving Mama Petrelli as the bad ass leader of the Company, there could always be more of her yelling at Hiro. And why do we need the speedy Daphne or Knox (who serves what purpose exactly?) Where are Micah or Monica? Haven't seen much of them around. Deal with the characters that we already know. Resolve their storylines and then and ONLY then, start adding new regular characters. Otherwise it is too much. Oh, and if you insist on bringing on new people, and you get someone awesome like Veronica Mars alum Francis Capra and give him a potentially interesting story where Peter is trapped in his body... let it play out for a little while instead of killing him off the first time you have a chance.

3. When Characters Die, Keep them Dead!
So they've brought back Linderman, though he's not alive, but he's a ghost or apparition or hallucination of some sort who is haunting Nathan's mind. They've brought back Niki/Jessica (as if we hadn't had enough of her) as yet a third needlessly annoying character who is involved with Nathan. And then there's Adam, who wasn't exactly dead since he can't die, but was good and buried and out of the way for a while, and then they had to go dig him up again. And Maya, who should have been dead, was revived. It's fine to bring people back for flashbacks, but if there are no consequences to having someone offed, as they'll just turn up again in some format or another, having them die really loses any impact.

4. Past and Future Versions Shouldn't Meet!
This is just science. Or typical science fiction. Future and Past versions of each other can't occupy the same space and time, or else like the universe or something explodes, or they just cease to exist. But not in the unbelievably insanity of Heroes. Future Peter and Past Peter can not only be in the same time, but they can also hang out and be friends. This is not cool. These paths shouldn't cross, most especially because the last thing we need is two Peter's running around.

5. Make Some Rules and Stick to Them!
I think the thing that gets me the most and makes me the most likely to throw solid objects at my television set, is that the rules are always changing on this show. Whenever something serves a storyline they go with it, even if later down the road it really makes no sense at all. It has been established that Peter's power is absorbing other people's powers just by proximity. So why send him to the future to track down Sylar and make him all pissed off to get back in the business, just so that he could learn his power... which is absorbing other people's abilities. Am I missing something? Probably. And if Hiro and Peter can time travel all over the place, why not just go back in time to fix things. I know, Hiro doesn't believe in going back in time because he seriously screwed up with the whole Kensei thing, but Peter had to shoot Nathan, instead of going back like 30 minutes earlier and having a nice rational conversation with him about why he shouldn't tell the world about their gifts?

6. If You Make a Theme, Have It Make Sense!
Villains! Sounds great on paper. More about the on-going battle of good and evil that has ruled the comic book industry for ages. And while I appreciate that they are exploring the gray area among people, are they good, are they evil, just a little more clarity would be great. If a leather clad Claire is suddenly all gung ho about killing Peter, it would be great to spend some time figuring that out. It's probably my fault for wrongly thinking there'd be more of a Legion of Doom or Brotherhood of Evil Mutants kind of thing. Instead there's lots of ambiguous stuff about good and evil and now and then and who's right and who's wrong, it's just too much.

7. When In Doubt, Add More Sylar!
The only worthwhile thing about the most recent trip to the faux future, was getting to see Sylar in a different light. Zachary Quinto is a fantastic actor. He's delicious when he's evil. He's even better when he's making waffles. And he's got pretty much every ability, so just having him doing random things every week couldn't hurt. And him and HRG together is a great development. Maybe make the entire show a buddy series with the two of them. That'd be kind of awesome.

That's my plan for the show to return to the awesomeness that I glimpsed in Season 1. Doubtful that they'll listen, but here's hoping. If they could have at least eliminated the scenes with Tracy/Nathan and their odd relationship, that'd be something. I'd take that. Thought that's not gonna happen either.

56 Comments

October 13, 2008 3:30 PM
NPFP
Reply

More Sylar?! Really? He's now a Petrelli, he has Claire's power and he works with HRG. Heroes is pratically The Sylar Show, now. I want to see more about other characters, for a change.

October 13, 2008 3:35 PM
Erica
Reply

You watch Prison Break too?

I was soooo ready to drop PB for Heroes this season, but I was very very disappointed with the ridiculous shenanigans of the Heroes premiere. PB has actually improved from last season, but Heroes is the opposite. I hated how everyone's personality changed, and the repeated resurrections.

October 13, 2008 3:38 PM
Lisa
Reply

EXCELLENT points, esp. about weeding out some of the characters. But always, always more Sylar - good and bad versions.

October 13, 2008 3:47 PM
Erin
Reply

I think what they're trying to tell us is that Sylar's power is has more to do with understanding how things work (it first manifested in the watches, now has progressed to brains). Which is why PP in the future was talking about understanding Nathan's intentions as well as reading his thoughts.

What remains to be seen (I think) is whether or not Sylar is required to kill people to 'figure out' their ability, or whether it's a symptom of 'the hunger'.

October 13, 2008 3:52 PM
Emily
Reply

Thank you for bringing up Monica. We had to keep sad sack Maya and got less Adam and Elle and lost Monica completely? If you're going to add characters, keep the good ones.

October 13, 2008 3:59 PM
Chadwick
Reply

A lot of the problems this season seem to be over compensation for the last (half) season. There's characters on the board who haven't been used in addition to Monica and Micah (Claude Raines, Elle, PP's stranded-in-the-future-girlfriend Caitlin, Nathan's kids, etc.) As far as the No Future Travel, Death for Reals, and Logical Consistancy rules- ye gods, let someone be listening.

(Fanboy quibble- Sylar's power is different from PP's in one crucial respect- Sylar can also ENHANCE abilities and see their future development (Claire's pain), while PP seems to be stuck at whatever level he saw (Mind reading, but no domination like Parkman).

As for more Z. Quinto- you forgot to add "shirtless" to your demands.

October 13, 2008 4:00 PM
Catherine
Reply

I totally agree with all your points...especially about Francis Carpra - I can't believe they killed Weevil so quickly! There are definitely way too many new characters, especially since they can't seem to keep up with all the old ones' storylines.

October 13, 2008 4:28 PM
Tony
Reply

Great points! Thank you for voicing clearly the mess that this once promising show has become. Heroes is currently a rudderless ship, going wherever it wants, plot-wise, with no regards to continuity, character arc, and storyline.
Also, did the writers et. al. forget about Peter's invisibility? eg: Claire could not shoot Peter, if Peter turned on his invisibility power.
Not ready to give up on the show just yet, but am very very close to it.

October 13, 2008 4:30 PM
Cierra
Reply

I totally agree with your points. The writers can't focus for too long on one goal or character personality without thinking of how ELSE this scenerio or person can develop. Just focus and make sense. I know this is science fiction but it is SCIENCE fiction. As they can clearly see now, going back and forth in time or just seeing the future just causes different problems to replace the ones you tried to solve.

October 13, 2008 4:40 PM
ziebra
Reply

Wow, I don't agree with your premise at all. Nor with any of your "fixes." I'm sorry you can't handle mutliple timelines and characters. May I suggest some asprin? The future episode was my favorite to date. Who cares if it is never going to happen now? It was great storytelling, and in a way thats never been done before! Yes, please make some rules... and then break them! TV needs more of that, not episode dramas that fit neatly into a package. I guess we expect different things from our sci-fi.

October 13, 2008 5:01 PM
Laurie
Reply

I completely agree with all of these points, especially the part about keeping the characters dead. There's nothing at stake when no one stays dead. However, I think that the Linderman hallucination is an acceptable way to bring back someone from the dead, and I'm interested to see what happens with that.

October 13, 2008 5:08 PM
Taren71
Reply

One thing you left out: More Nathan. Nathan is my favorite character, and while we are blessedly seeing more of him this time around versus the horrific season 2, he's still underutilized.
I'd rather see him in a relationship with Tracy than having perhaps one scene per episode like last season. What I really don't like is how we haven't even heard one mention about what is happening with his marriage, or even the existence of his children, thus far this season.
The Parkman spirit walk was an utter failure, although i personally found it got interesting when we saw the Parkman/Daphne connection in the future.
Who do we need far less of? Peter and Mohinder. They are both complete and total idiots who don't learn from their mistakes, and I wouldn't miss either character.

October 13, 2008 5:12 PM
John (JRThro)
Reply
replied to comment from ziebra

But science fiction is *about* having consistent rules and sticking to them.

October 13, 2008 5:12 PM
Crazy Mad Rabid Fangirl
Reply

What this show does great is families. Real families, adopted families, makeshift families. They need to bring poor abandoned Matt (Grunberg consistently brings the most detailed and textured characterization of the show to that role, despite that anything named Petrelli gets more airtime) back to his unusual living situation and tell us what the hell is going on with that, whether it's a slasher's dream or a buddy comedy or something altogether different. We were never told how that started. And work with the Claire's Two Moms angle instead of doing it for one episode and then having Claire head for the hills. Peter and Nathan work better than Peter and Peter, or even Peter and Sylar. Mohinder had meaning with Molly and when he was working to avenge his father's murder. Stick with the families and this show is great. That's where the real power is.

October 13, 2008 5:16 PM
Adrienne
Reply

I agree with some of the points made. Mostly with the addition of new characters. I like a lot of them( Elle,Adam and such) but then you have Maya who is just a hanger-on waiting for something to do, which leads to the boring.

October 13, 2008 5:39 PM
Chris
Reply

Bravo! I'm getting really tired of the little gimmicks that they're pulling this season. Yeah, HRG and Sylar out in the field is cool, but so... cheap. It doesn't make any sense. Going to the future. Again. ::Yawn:: Best thing with that was Sylar.

I think the only thing I disagree with is Nathan/Tracy. I really didn't like Niki. She was boring and mental. But the Tracy thread seems like it will go somewhere interesting. Well more interesting than the current quest that they seem to be building up. And I can't get enough of Nathan. The smarter of the Petrelli boys. More of him please. Less of anyone who's name begins with M!

October 13, 2008 5:44 PM
Dawn
Reply

Angel? WORD. Seriously.

And I would love to see more Sylar and HRG. The waffles thing was too cute ;)

October 13, 2008 5:44 PM
Dawn
Reply

Angel? WORD. Seriously.

And I would love to see more Sylar and HRG. The waffles thing was too cute ;)

October 13, 2008 5:48 PM
Srol
Reply

Fixing number 1 fixes everything wrong with this season. So far every plot in each season on this show has dealt around warnings from the future. Can't people generate their own menace without going to the future to find some?

October 13, 2008 6:01 PM
Sabol
Reply

The biggest problem I see is that everyone is related to everyone else. The fun of the show at first was strangers growing powers. Now Claire is Sylar's niece, Peters niece, Nathan's daughter, Mrs. P's granddaughter, HRG's daughter... Niki, Jessica et al are all related. Stop the madness.

October 13, 2008 6:11 PM
Heather
Reply

I think Dr. Murphy from Scrubs said it best when he yelled "Dead people should stay dead!"
I agree with everything. Please. It's getting into a circus.

October 13, 2008 7:12 PM
Miranda
Reply

I totally agree with what you've said here. And if these things don't get fixed this season (I'll be shocked if they are), I'm done.

October 13, 2008 8:02 PM
Amanda
Reply

THANK YOU for voicing everything that is wrong with this crap show!! I almost stopped watching after the premiere, then gave it another chance since I was bored on Monday nights. I'm tuning in tonight to see what's up with Papa Petrelli, but more than likely I"m going to have to give it up after another epsode or two...the stupidity is just driving me crazy.

October 13, 2008 8:15 PM
Veronica
Reply

So much proof that this show is really just a shinier, snazzier Charmed (points 1, 2, 3, 4 and oh my god, especially 5).

October 13, 2008 8:15 PM
Veronica
Reply

So much proof that this show is really just a shinier, snazzier Charmed (points 1, 2, 3, 4 and oh my god, especially 5).

October 13, 2008 8:26 PM
Jane
Reply

Thank you! You took the words out of my mouth (or keyboard). The only thing I would add is that the writers need to develop plots in the service of a single, compelling story arc that takes place over the season. Granted, the actual scene at Kirby Plaza was a bit of a letdown, but everything in Season 1 led up to the Exploding Man moment. The last two seasons have no direction (so far) because there is no central story.

October 13, 2008 9:41 PM
rickc
Reply

Thank you! I agree with all your points and am glad you said it, I am up for seeing new characters but not when they're annoying or boring like Flashette or NeoIsaac.
Yes, I want my villains to be truly evil, not just doing bad things when trying to do good or whatever.
Can we please put Mohinder out of his misery? for good? (and Maya)
And the most important thing, stick to your own rules!

October 13, 2008 9:55 PM
Rob
Reply

Absolutely NO. MORE. SYLAR. He's tired. He's overexposed. He needs to go AWAY. In terms of the comic comparison, we're now on the third straight year of Batman fighting the Joker. Time for the fight to be with someone else.

Other than that (and minor disagreements about going to the future and different time periods meeting; but then I've always been a sucker for that sort of thing) I agree with everything you said.

October 13, 2008 10:22 PM
b
Reply

Oh, c'mon, 4 is just silly. That's just a made-up sci-fi plot device. Worry more about how Future!Peter could even keep existing once he's killed Nathan and changed the future. Also, I actually really like how they're handling the villains thing. It's far more interesting to see all of these characters as three-dimensional people who have good and bad traits than boogeymen vs superman.

I totally agree on more Sylar/HRG and What The Hell Happened To Monica, though. And Peter's power - shouldn't he have just absorbed Sylar's the first (or any subsequent) time they met??

October 13, 2008 10:56 PM
Kyri
Reply

OMG. At this point the only thing that will save the show for me is if they finally get catch a clue and off Sylar for good.

The other core issue is that I don't think the creators understand Heroes started gaining momentum when the characters started putting things together and getting SMARTER. So why all the characters with the collective IQ of a turnip?

October 14, 2008 12:05 AM
Kat
Reply

Oh my God, I'm glad someone remembered Caitlin. Peter sure hasn't. And I found NeoIsaac more interesting than Matt, although it was verging on Magical Negro territory.

October 14, 2008 12:05 AM
Kris
Reply

I completely agree with everything you said....except for Sylar. I wish they had killed him off in season 1, and now he's just so tired.

October 14, 2008 12:14 AM
Roger
Reply

God, I _hate_ inconsistent mythology. Absolutely annoyed with the fact that Peter needed to be "taught" Sylar's ability, rather than pure absorbtion.

But what I'm just waiting for the show to mess up is the origin of the superpowers--all of a sudden, it's in the adrenaline, even though many powers are manifested without adrenaline (even putting aside those who have gained control over their power, what about someone like Mama Petrelli, whose power only acts when she's asleep?). But if it's really a hormonal thing, then all of a sudden it doesn't make sense that Sylar needs to understand brains to take powers.

It seems like the writers are coming up with all these ideas they're excited about, failing to parse them and focus on quality of development, and then contriving the plot/mythology to implement the ideas without worrying about the ramifications.

It seems to me that the key element the show has lost since Season 1 is the slow unpacking--the intensely engaging quality of the show was the way characters were slowly introduced, powers were gradually revealed and understood, and dots were connected between characters. At this point, the show has burned through so many abilities that the audience pretty much accepts that any power is possible (remember how exciting invisibility was? and how not exciting freezing things is?), and the show is so soap-opera-y that even Sylar being a Petrelli was exciting for about a minute. It's the same sort of problem Lost encountered, once they finished telling back stories.

The show is going with quantity over quality, and its disappointing.

October 14, 2008 12:15 AM
Nate
Reply

#5 is the biggest issue for me, really. It's not so much that I feel the show lacks rules, but that half the time the rule gets stated after it's been disproved. Biggest case in point in my mind: Now they say that Sylar's power creates hunger for him. He was powerless for Season 2, so what's up with him as a remorseless killing machine during that time? Or my biggest gripe from season 1: the only difference between the future timeline Hero and Ando observed and the timeline that actually happened should be their presence in it, yet half the people who turned out to be in Kirby Plaza for the explosion still lived in the future timeline. The writers need to start doing some long range planning in their stories.

As for #4, the whole notion that a future self and past self can't occupy the same space and time is nonsense from a Jean Claude Van Damme movie; not a quality rule of science fiction. Strictly speaking, two of anything can't occupy the same space and time; that's why FP and PP are, you know, a few feet (or more) apart most of the time, just like they're a few feet apart from any other character.

October 14, 2008 12:22 AM
lemon
Reply

Q: How did Peter appear in Sylar's level 5 cell? I though it was supposed to be power proof?

October 14, 2008 2:05 AM
Fiona
Reply

Totally agree. Maya's character should never have been introduced, and I am *this* close to saying Mohinder should be killed off along with her. I am so frustrated with his character - not only is he useless, but also how did he suddenly become so reckless, injecting himself with powers in the first place?

I need more Elle and HRG. I can't believe Jesse was killed off so quicky - love Francis Capra and I was hoping for some interesting Jesse (NOT Peter-in-Jesse)-Elle interactions - "Veronica Mars" fan here, just in case that wasn't obvious.

Also wish Claire would stop being so emo (not that I don't feel for her, but I'm sorry: BORING) and that Hiro would grow up (just a little would be nice), among other things.

By the way, can/has Peter absorb(ed) the Haitian's power? Or is the Haitian's power the only one so far (that Peter has come into contact with) that Peter hasn't been able to absorb because it is power-negating?

October 14, 2008 2:23 AM
Bebzi
Reply

I just would like to say that while some are dissapointed at how things went in Heroes.. there are also some who are liking what's happening.. Gotta say.. fair enough. :-)

October 14, 2008 2:24 AM
Bebzi
Reply

I just would like to say that while some are dissapointed at how things went in Heroes.. there are also some who are liking what's happening.. Gotta say.. fair enough. :-)

October 14, 2008 3:14 AM
Bec
Reply

All of those and not one suggestion to bring back the brotherly lurve?

Serious, the show is missing something when the Petrelli brothers are constantly apart and not touching.

But I think they've pretty much written themselves into a corner so they can't bring back the bro-yay.

October 14, 2008 3:44 AM
Leslie
Reply

I agree with the complaints about dropped threads and characters and too many confusing and/or boring plot twists. However, the plot with past/future Peter hanging out doesn't violate any time-traveling laws; in fact, there's a classic book by David Gerrold called "The Man Who Folded Himself" which featured many multiple versions of the main character hanging out together.

October 14, 2008 5:54 AM
sonny
Reply

Totally agreed with Angel Cohn. Heroes sucked last year and it seems to be worst this season. The writers actually abuse time travelling. Too many time travels just make the storyline inconsistent, nonsensical and always confusing. Too many new (and furtive) characters are a waste of time and don't let the show exploit awesome characters like in season one. Just one thing I disagree with Angel: it's good to have again Ali Larter, she's hot and awesome. The mistake is to kill her off last season. That's why Tracy character is kind of useless character. But Ali is so hot and I want her on the show.

October 14, 2008 6:03 AM
sonny
Reply

Totally agreed with Angel Cohn. Heroes sucked last year and it seems to be worst this season. The writers actually abuse time travelling. Too many time travels just make the storyline inconsistent, nonsensical and always confusing. Too many new (and furtive) characters are a waste of time and don't let the show exploit awesome characters like in season one. Just one thing I disagree with Angel: it's good to have again Ali Larter, she's hot and awesome. The mistake is to kill her off last season. That's why Tracy character is kind of useless character. But Ali is so hot and I want her on the show.

October 14, 2008 8:09 AM
jaki
Reply

"Two Peter's" should not have an apostrophe. Those who can't punctuate should not judge others (although you're mostly right). Fine, they can judge, but should not be paid to write.

October 14, 2008 8:38 AM
al
Reply

I agree with your gripes about continuity - there are so many holes in the plot it's laughable.

And I am perturbed as to why the show keeps so many dead weight characters (Maya, Niki/Jessica/Tracey/whatever, Parkman) around, yet gives characters who a) have a purpose, and b) are almost universally popular, like Adam, next to no screen time, and who they'll probably kill off anyway. It's kind of ridiculous. I must admit that the only thing keeping me around for the third season is the promise of more Adam - if they've brought him back just to get rid of him again, I'll definitely give up on this show for good.

October 14, 2008 8:43 AM
Dawnr
Reply

Read this yesterday before watching the latest episode of "Heroes" and agreed with evertyhing. After last night's episode I have to disagree. There is nothing "Heroes" can do now to keep from sucking. Too late- they have completely killed this show.

October 14, 2008 8:56 AM
Jesse
Reply

The problem right now is that the show is trying to save itself from a bad second season. They did a good thing by killing off the Nikki/Jessica and giving Larter the new gimmick. The previous character was too difficult to weave into the "global" plot (it also got rid of Micah... huge plus!). They also made a good move by evolving Sylar into a more complete character, as he's easily the best actor on the show.

Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to fix a show once its broken. Evolving Sylar means you have to create new villains for balance, and this had led to the lame Mohinder storyline and the future-Claire junk. I like the introduction of the new characters as small-time players like Knox, but they took it too far with Daphne. She's too involved too quckly.

I think the biggest mistake has been not evolving your two biggest heros, Peter and Hiro, from the characters they were in Season One. Peter still seems like he has no idea what he's doing, and Hiro is way too goofy. These guys have been portrayed as total bad-asses in what's supposed to be the not-so-distant future. Shouldn't they be starting to move into those roles now?

October 14, 2008 9:38 AM
Carlos
Reply
replied to comment from Tony

His power won't work with The Haitan around. He got shot while ... So no invisibility for FP. IMHO the season looks great to me. In my mind the stakes being higher was always underplayed. Now that FP,peter and Mama Petrelli are out of play the story can now lead us towards undertanding how the future gets the way it does. FYI some consequences are lasting.

October 14, 2008 11:44 AM
Gwen
Reply

I gave up watching after seeing the first few episodes of season 2. I thought I'd give it another try this season, but have been equally disappointed. All the points made above are absolutely the reason, especially the time travel thing (too much of it) and the dropped storylines. There seems to be a lack of commitment on the part of the writers to actually flesh out the stories. It's like ADD writing, in my opinion. Jumping from one thing to the next, back and forth between time, and its so convoluted and complicated. I don't mind complex storytelling, but I want to see real human stories along with the action. Not action stories with some humanity thrown in there. I guess its a matter of taste, but for me what was so cool about season 1 was the way that ordinary people dealt with having extraordinary abilities -the way they incorporated the abilities in their normal lives, while hiding them from their "normal" peers and families. Now it seems every one has an ability and their stories are just so far from reality that I can't relate anymore, nor do I care. Nobody uses their ability in a smart way, and most of the abilities are pretty stupid: freezing things, that fear one, the sound one. I am still in love with the IDEA of the show and might continue watching a little bit longer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

October 14, 2008 11:46 AM
Gwen
Reply

I gave up watching after seeing the first few episodes of season 2. I thought I'd give it another try this season, but have been equally disappointed. All the points made above are absolutely the reason, especially the time travel thing (too much of it) and the dropped storylines. There seems to be a lack of commitment on the part of the writers to actually flesh out the stories. It's like ADD writing, in my opinion. Jumping from one thing to the next, back and forth between time, and its so convoluted and complicated. I don't mind complex storytelling, but I want to see real human stories along with the action. Not action stories with some humanity thrown in there. I guess its a matter of taste, but for me what was so cool about season 1 was the way that ordinary people dealt with having extraordinary abilities -the way they incorporated the abilities in their normal lives, while hiding them from their "normal" peers and families. Now it seems every one has an ability and their stories are just so far from reality that I can't relate anymore, nor do I care. Nobody uses their ability in a smart way, and most of the abilities are pretty stupid: freezing things, that fear one, the sound one. I am still in love with the IDEA of the show and might continue watching a little bit longer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

October 14, 2008 9:09 PM
libby
Reply

Completely agree. What a Waste of Weevil!

October 15, 2008 5:40 AM
thorswitch
Reply

Aside from thinking it needs more Sylar, everything you said is exactly why I stopped watching after the 2-hour premier. What made me sad, though, is that it wasn't even a conscious decision - I'd Tivo'd last Monday's episode and realized that ever time I thought about watching it, I just couldn't make myself do it.

October 28, 2008 9:14 PM
sonic
Reply

After watching the premier I couldn't believe it. I totally agree with everything you said and then some. To me, everything that was established in season one has been forgotten or thrown away. Now, Maya skips off into the sunset and Adam and Maury are dead? WTF?? This show started losing me just before the writers strike and now each episode seems like a joke. Besides, I can read my own fan fiction since it seems to be following a lot of the current plot lines - but unlike the show, it actually makes sense

January 1, 2009 12:49 PM
Tom
Reply

Heroes has completely and utterly abandoned its original theme, which is how ordinary people would deal with having these powers come into their lives. Instead, the show has become non-stop improbably events, one after another. It never had good plot continuity, and now has lost the one thing it did have going for it, which was compelling characters.

January 1, 2009 3:01 PM
Heather
Reply

I have a controversial point, but I think Heroes started sucking since they killed Ted. When Sylar said "Boom" at the end of Landslide, it was almost like saying "Boom! Bye bye good points of the show!"

January 1, 2009 3:01 PM
Heather
Reply

I have a controversial point, but I think Heroes started sucking since they killed Ted. When Sylar said "Boom" at the end of Landslide, it was almost like saying "Boom! Bye bye good points of the show!"

August 30, 2009 6:03 PM
Dennis
Reply

Heroes is, and always will be, a rip off of the 1986 Marvel comic called "D.P.7"

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

January 2012

12 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries