BLOGS

Secret Millionaire: The Secret Is, It's Not Very Engaging

I swear I'm not a heartless bitch -- well, most of the time. I totally teared up when Michelle was reunited with her dad on The Biggest Loser this past week, so I'm not utterly unfeeling. But I tried watching Secret Millionaire last night. It's got a nice Extreme Makeover kind of premise about it. Multi-millionaires go undercover to live in the real world to see how poor, or regular, people survive. Then after a week, they give them money out of their own pocket. It's kind of like what Greg Garcia did during the writers strike, but, you know, filmed for television.

I wanted to like it. I still enjoy grabbing a box of tissues and watching Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, but there's just something about this that doesn't give me that warm, fuzzy feeling. I mean, the poverty-stricken people on this show are undeniably deserving of the cash, and it is sort of fun to see people with megabucks trying to cope with the day-to-day realities of people who don't spend $4000 for dinner, but it just doesn't tug at my heartstrings. I think it is the same problem that I had with Oprah's Big Give. Like, there are so many good people out there just doing what they can to stay afloat and get by; how do you pick who is the most deserving? And if these secret millionaires have cash to burn on private jets and yachts, why do they have to choose just one or two people to help out? I dunno. And then there's the whole lying thing, which kind of rubs me the wrong way.

Ostensibly this show claims that they tell the "poor" people that the millionaires are doing a documentary on poverty. But if a guy who was bright orange (like George Hamilton) from a healthy overdose of sunbeds and self-tanner showed up at my door looking for work, I'd be skeptical. These Millionaires, don't exactly arrive Morgan Spurlock-style. I mean, I did like Greg (the orange guy), and his sullen son Cole, but the second he came in and applied for a construction job, I would have politely turned him the other way. He couldn't figure out how to put on a face mask. Which really makes me wonder, how did they discover the job? They didn't seem to be researching anything, they just kind of showed up in a small, polluted beach town and found a pay-by-the-day motel they could afford with their tiny budget (equivalent to a local welfare check). Did they just stroll around until they found a job? And they just happened to run into a nice woman who believed in the pay it forward mantra, and another kind soul who was running a makeshift homeless shelter in her house, and a family struggling to pay medical bills for a young girl with cancer. The mean old cynic in me just thinks that maybe, just maybe, someone tipped them off somehow.

The second episode was even more jarring to me. Gwen and Todd, a well-to-do couple who both made their fortunes in the restaurant business, take off in a brand-new SUV, head down to a coastal Louisiana community still recovering from Hurricane Katrina, and are set up with their "welfare" cash and a little trailer. No cockroach filled motel for them. They don't even try to get a job to make ends meet. Instead they just drive around, talk to people and then at the end of the week hand out checks. Which is generous, don't get me wrong. It is a nice thing they are doing, but like why the shadiness? Why couldn't they just say they were working on a documentary and live among the people? Why couldn't they just act like journalists or volunteers who were looking to help out? Plus, while the people that are getting these checks (which total at least $100,000) seem grateful, they have this perplexed look on their face, like "why were you lying to me?" I mean, they are all happy about the helping hand up, but the secrets just seem unnecessary.

And why the need to pretend to be poor? I'm sure that they could have learned more about these communities by talking to these people rather than spending a week living in a trailer or a shady motel. In fact, watching the millionaires adjust to the lives is the part of this show that I like the least. I don't really care so much about their pain -- which lasts for a week -- when we are supposed to be learning about why the people they've met are so deserving. Those stories of giving back to the community when you have nothing or overcoming the odds just to survive -- that's the kind of stuff I'd like to see more of, and much less of how Gwen and Todd love to go to black-tie dinners and fly their family places in private jets with the help of their entire entourage of employed help. If it makes them learn and be more willing to give back and help out, I guess it is OK, but I'd rather the show focus more on how this money helped the lives of people in their .

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm just too cynical about this whole thing. Did this show give you warm fuzzies? Sound off below

4 Comments

December 4, 2008 3:18 PM
clairemia
Reply

I had the same reaction... why did they have to bother lying to those perfectly nice people? And I would have liked to know more about how that woman came to have all those people staying in her house, and about the people who were working on opening the coffee shop/church/community center. I like the idea of helping people who deserve it, but something about the way the show was presented was just off.

December 4, 2008 3:40 PM
Angelo
Reply

I watched Secret Millionaire and I could not believe that the millionaire from Louisiana issued three checks, each for $100,000 all dated April 31, 2008. Last time I checked there were only 30 days in April. Are the checks still good???
I can't believe FOX did not catch this.

December 4, 2008 4:25 PM
guen
Reply

it rubs us all the wrong way for a reason- because unlike the other shows, this makes it about the rich people doing the giving more than the poor people who are deserving. It's more like the Simple Life with a check at the end than it is Extreme Home Makeover. Why do these rich people need to star in a TV show a slum it for a week in order to be convinced that they should donate this money out of their pocket? why weren't they already doing such charitable giving if they could afford it?

December 4, 2008 5:35 PM
Rachel
Reply

Admittedly, I didn't watch, but that's because the premise itself just seems . . . gross to me. It's very condescending and even classist to have these rich people "choose" the "best" poor people. I know it's supposed to be sweet, but to me it just comes off as yucky.

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

January 2012

12 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries