BLOGS

TWoP 10: Reasons To Tune In to The Golden Globes

by Angel Cohn January 9, 2009 6:00 AM
TWoP 10: Reasons To Tune In to The Golden Globes

The Emmy Awards basically sucked and were painful to watch and we're still scarred from that whole hosting debacle but we're optimistic that the Golden Globes will be better. At the very least they can't be any worse.

1. Tipsy People Giving Speeches
Hands down the one thing that the Golden Globes has over the Emmys and Oscars is that there is booze flowing freely so the winners and presenters are way more relaxed. So there's a silliness and a lightness to the acceptance speeches and canned dialogue that you just can't get anywhere else... well, maybe the IFC awards, but they tend to get a little sloppy over there and no one is keeping the madness in check.

2. Movie and TV Stars Together
Most award shows only honor either movies or TV, but the crazy Hollywood Foreign Press folks put them together, so we get to see Tina Fey and Angelina Jolie sitting next to each other at the same awards show. Fun for the whole family.

3. No Annoying Hosts
So instead of a slew of reality hosts or one host trying to be funny (or trying something different like Hugh Jackman) they do it the easy way: there's an announcer and a string of presenters. So no jokes, musical numbers, no awkward "Uma/Oprah" stuff, just awards. As it should be.

4. To Prepare for Our Oscar Pool
The Golden Globes winners have long been a precursor to who's got a good shot at taking home an Academy Award. So in order to have a clue who might be the critically lauded darling throughout award season, we watch the Globes to know who to put our money on come Oscar night. It's that or randomly guessing.

5. Awkward Celeb Offspring
Ah, the longstanding tradition of crowning a Miss Golden Globes out of the celebrity gene pool. Not every year generates a Melanie Griffith. In fact, most of the time it is famous people's daughters who might not have gotten hit with the genetic beauty stick that their parents have. There's usually some fun to be had checking out these Hollywood kids who mostly disappear off the acting map after this event. This year? Rumer Willis (Demi and Bruce's kid) [Editor's Note: Is it just me or does it feel like it's been Rumer for the past four or five years? Probably just me. -- Mindy], who certainly is an interesting looking combo of her parents.

6. Seeing if Skinny Starlets Actually Eat
Not only is there drinking, there's also food served at these giant round tables. Seeing if those thin celebrities actually eat is a drinking game unto itself. Amy Adams noshing on a crudite? Drink.

7. Shorter Than the Oscars
No need to stay up past midnight watching a bloated awards show that recognizes achievements in categories you never heard of. This one usually comes in right around its three-hour mark and for that we're truly grateful. We need all the rest we can get, what with the upcoming post-Super Bowl Office episode and the Oscars coming up.

8. Anything Is Better Than Last Year's Press Conference
Because of the on-going writer's strike, they decided to hand out the awards with little fanfare, at a stupid press conference. Though still worse was the NBC coverage, where they allowed Billy Bush and Nancy O'Dell to analyze the winners as if it were a sporting event of some sort. So bad.

9. Vain Hope that Neil Patrick Harris Will Win Supporting Actor
We NPH fans realize that the Supporting Actor category is stuffed with drama, miniseries and comedy actors. NPH is up against some heavy hitters, so it seems unlikely he'll win, but we can dream, can't we? Isn't the surprise win what's really exciting about awards shows anyhow?

10. To Actually See Who Wins
We actually like to see our favorite actors get trophies for doing good work (this does not apply if Tony Shalhoub takes home another trophy). We like to see quality programs like Mad Men and that ilk take home prizes, so that more people will actually watch them. Plus, Jon Hamm in a tux happily holding trophies? Always a good thing.

What's your favorite part of the Golden Globes, or do you skip it and just read the winner's list the next day?

16 Comments

January 9, 2009 10:28 AM
Rowena
Reply

I can't stand watching awards shows.

The selection of nominees and winners is irrelevant. I couldn't care less which movie out of the 5 boring flicks I didn't see wins for Best Picture.

Not only do I find the entire process pointless, but the shows are hopelessly dull. There is nothing fun about an awards show. Ever. Unless you're talking about the handful of good years the MTV awards shows had.

January 9, 2009 11:34 AM
goodygoody
Reply

I must respectfully diasgree with the above poster. I LOVE awards shows and watch watch almost every one that graces our screen. I love to see what everyone is wearing, who will make the biggest fool of themselves, etc.

And Jon Hamm in a tux is worth the price of admission!

January 9, 2009 12:59 PM
Pinwiz
Reply
replied to comment from Rowena

Actually, there's some interesting movies up for Best Picture for once. If we are looking at the Drama pics for the Golden Globes, you've got "Slumdog" and "Nixon".

It's already a step ahead from last year.

January 9, 2009 1:45 PM
ileen
Reply

Thanks to DVR technology, scheduling this three hour extravaganza opposite the two hour series premiere of 24 pretty much guarantees I'll be oversleeping Monday morning.

January 9, 2009 2:37 PM
zelmia
Reply

Actually, Freddy Prinze Jr was one of the "awkward offspring" one year and he's done reasonably well.

January 9, 2009 2:49 PM
Stephanie
Reply

I agree about Rumer-I thought she's been presenting for forever!

January 9, 2009 4:18 PM
Hannah
Reply

Rumer was scheduled to do it last year, but because of the strike the ceremony was cancelled, so she's doing it this year. That's probably why it feels like she's been around forever.

Still has 2 sisters to come after her, too ... someone has to take over until Suri is old enough ...

January 9, 2009 7:38 PM
Melissa A
Reply

I'll be watching but seriously, the golden globes is a joke. The HFPA (the 81 people who vote for these) have a median age of 90 and half of them don't speak English. They are starfkers and easily influenced because their foreign asses are kissed by all of the studios. The awards mean nothing but no one wants to take a stand and say they don't.

January 9, 2009 7:42 PM
Alex
Reply

I generally watch to see who looks horrible on the red carpet, but more to see a Hugh Laurie Acceptance Speech - he absolutely kills.

January 10, 2009 1:45 AM
Jeremy
Reply

I would watch the Golden Globes, but that's simply not an option with "24" returning on Sunday as well. At the same damn time. I mean, perhaps I'll tune in if "24" even has a wiff of season 6 in it, but I'm being optimistic that it won't.

January 10, 2009 10:55 AM
angie
Reply

GO NPH!!!! Jeremy Piven, you have won the past 6 years in a row. It is someone else's turn!

January 10, 2009 11:19 AM
Twilight Man
Reply

A few years back, when Friends and ER were still on the air, TV stars could hold their own alongside movie stars. Now, not so much.
Donna Douglas, Linda Evans, Anne Archer, & Laura Dern (along with Melanie) have all been Miss Golden Globes, so there is some incredible predigree that comes with this thankless job.
Let's see if Heath wins yet again!!!

January 10, 2009 10:46 PM
KCS
Reply

Why would I want to watch an award show that gives award from a dodgy and corrupted organization that has no business giving anything of this magnitude?

January 25, 2009 3:39 PM
OPRAHSLAYER
Reply

Just because Amy Adams is a big fat porker pig like egOprah doesn't mean she's TOO skinny (like that filthy whore Angelina Jolieless)!

January 25, 2009 3:43 PM
OPRAHSLAYER
Reply

Obviously, I meant ..."NOT" a big fat porker pig... ;(

January 20, 2012 7:35 AM
Rowdy
Reply

Wow, that's a really cvleer way of thinking about it!

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

January 2012

51 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries