BLOGS

6 Ways to Fix Fringe

by Mindy Monez February 5, 2009 1:30 PM
6 Ways to Fix Fringe Fringe knows how to do a lot of things very well -- the opening scenes that set up each week's case are almost always scary and a lot of fun, and I think the show really has moved away from being an X-Files rip-off into something that is its own thing -- but there are still some nagging road blocks that are keeping the show from being truly great. Even in light of the past two exceptionally good episodes, there are some pressing issues the writers need to get to fixing ASAP.

Stop forcing the Peter/Olivia romance.
Because it isn't working, and it's a waste of everyone's time. These two characters (actors?) have no sexual chemistry, and a close friend and colleague relationship between them would serve the show far better than trying to get them together romantically. Also, this isn't Grey's Anatomy. Just because she's a woman and he's a man and they work together doesn't mean they need to start hooking up for no reason.

Leave Boston more often.
Besides the fact that it's just unlikely that this many bizarre cases would happen in just one city (and yes, they could be happening all over the world and just not making the news, but wouldn't the FBI have heard about it?) the show would be a lot more interesting and believable if the Fringe team at least left the East Coast to investigate something every once in a while. I know the show shoots in New York, and thus doesn't have the Disney lot luxury that, say, Alias had, but hey, Science Prison was in Germany, and I believed the shit out of that. They could make it work.

It's time to focus on The Pattern.
It feels like every time we start consistently moving on The Pattern, the show stops for stand-alone, or tangentially-related mysteries or other diversions, and everything just... stops. We met The Observer! That's crazy! We're really going somewhere! And then, even though he still usually shows up in a blink-and-you-missed-him capacity, the Fringe team has stopped talking about him. Mitchell Loeb says Olivia has no idea how big the conspiracy is! He was trying to help her! That's crazy! And then no one mentions that insane development this week, not even when they're just hanging out in the lab with nothing to do ("Hey Peter, remember that thing Mitchell Loeb said? Wow. Hey, anybody seen Gene lately?"). I understand the apprehension about making a show that requires the vigilant viewing that Alias and Lost did, but why introduce The Pattern at all if the show is just going to be some sci fi version of CSI or something? The Pattern is what makes the show special, and we need to know who the enemy is. If it's Massive Dynamic and Olivia needs to take them down, then let's start doing that. If not, then introduce something else. Are we really going to spend the entire first season having no idea who or what we're fighting?

More kung fu, please.
Remember when Olivia was kidnapped by Mitchell Loeb a few episodes ago, and then woke up as Bruce Lee to single-handedly beat the crap out of his minions and escape? That sure was delightful! I wouldn't mind seeing more of that.

Give Broyles, Charlie and Astrid better things to say and do.
The best shows are the ones that make you fall in love with all of its characters, even the auxiliary ones. Alias did that, Veronica Mars did that, Lost certainly does that (with exceptions, but it's an enormous cast), The Wire, Battlestar, and millions of others did that. But right now Fringe feels a lot more like House, where so much care is given to one character's -- Walter's -- hilarious antics, and everyone else just says whatever, and gets developed or not depending on how much time they have, and Lance Reddick is wasted barking gruff orders and delivering clichéd dialogue, Charlie is an underdeveloped lackey, and adorable little Astrid just picks up cheesesteaks and only every once in a while gets to contribute something wildly random. I don't feel like I know any of them yet, and 13 episodes in, it's time to get us emotionally invested in the entire Fringe team, not just Peter and Walter.

Olivia almost has a personality, now let's bring it home.
This week's resolution of the John Scott plotline gave us a few nice, intimate moments with Olivia, and the inclusion of her sister and niece has done a lot to humanize her lately, but I'm still not to a point where I really love Olivia. I root for her, sure, but I still don't know why I should like her. That's a problem. A lot of people (including me) have blamed Anna Torv, but I've been thinking about it and I'm not so sure now. The other day Angel and I were talking about the show and came to the realization that if someone watching hadn't watched The Wire or Lost, and just had Broyles's scenes to go on, they might think Lance Reddick isn't worth crap as an actor, and we all know how wrong that is. I think the problem with Olivia may lie much more with the writing than with Anna Torv's acting capabilities. She really needs to be developed more, and given more interesting dialogue and a stronger point of view (we don't even really know her personal history yet) before I can rejoice when she's on the screen. Or Anna Torv might actually be terrible, or it may be a combination of both. But at this point I'm willing to hold out for better writing.

Thoughts?
TAGS:

48 Comments

February 5, 2009 2:52 PM
Carole
Reply

TOTALLY agree. I sure hope they follow your advice...maybe we could, like, send in a bunch of cow crap? Because I want to know where Gene went.

Sigh. I am SO the person who gets totally invested right away and then devastated when a show is cancelled (I'm still mourning "Traveler," for cripes sake), but aside from missing the X-Files-y stuff, and Walter, and Joshua Jackson (not so much Peter), I wouldn't be sad to lose this show. Which is a strange feeling for me!

I miss Buffy.

February 5, 2009 3:23 PM
Josh
Reply

I truly agree with you. When the renegade (?) FBI agent said, "This won't take long" and Olivia quipped, "I bet you say that to all the girls," I realized that it was just the writing that detracted from her character. Anna Torv can deliver the wit; it's just not there to give.

February 5, 2009 3:57 PM
Temmere
Reply

Agree on almost every point. The only one I'd dispute is the kung fu one. Not that it isn't cool when characters kick ass, but I like it better and find it more realistic when they use their intellects.

I especially agree with keeping Olivia and Peter just colleagues, but I'm afraid the ship has already set sail on that one.

February 5, 2009 4:57 PM
praxithea
Reply

Agreed on all and I'd add another. I'm an angst addict. We need to see more about Peter and Walter's relationship. I'm willing to bet Peter has a whole host of daddy issues to get over, and Walter has some untapped guilt over what he's done to Peter. Nothing spells hit show like a little relationship angst.

Plus, let's get rid of some of the extraneous FBI people, they muddle the soup a bit. I don't know, let Olivia go really rogue with Walter and Peter a bit.

February 5, 2009 6:16 PM
Krista
Reply

I have just about given up on this show, and agree with the criticisms of the article. A fan of Alias, Lost, and the X-files, among other shows, I was willing to give this one a chance, but after so many episodes, I find that I just don't care what happens next. The characterization (or lack of it) is certainly part of that but it just seems like the show is lazily written overall. The dealbreaker for me is that in a show that is ostensibly science fiction, or at least soft sci-fi-ish fantasy, nothing that they say about the science bears any remote resemblance to reality. Now nasopharyngitis is caused by something comparative to cells that can be killed with decongestants? Really? Has anybody that writes for this show taken high school biology? Just when I'm interested because a giant slug-monster has crawled out of some guy's throat they have Walter, the "scientist", say something so utterly ridiculous as to completely drop my disbelief from its tenuous suspension. Dana Scully never got it that wrong. The show can be fantasy, and can do whatever it wants but when the characters say something that untrue and refutable by Wikipedia, then it makes everything else seem much less plausible and really takes me out of the experience. Maybe if I actually cared about the characters I wouldn't notice it all that much, but either way it is lazy writing.

February 5, 2009 7:06 PM
ooompa
Reply

What really kills it for me is how Dunham doesn't really bring much to the table:

Broyles = the boss. Keeps the operation moving, and keeps Dunham in check. Gives orders. Provides higher-level access and information when he deems necessary.

Daddy Bishop = the brilliant, but mad, scientist.

Sonny Bishop = scientist's assistant and audience interpreter who rephrases Walter's pseudoscience-speak into folksy speak.

Astrid = gopher, grunt, secretary, office assistant. Walter's folksy-translator when Peter's not around.


And finally, we have:

Olivia Dunham = travels to and fro, asking what's that and where's what and saying 'Walter what have you found so far?', and then relaying the info to Broyles, and then traveling to the next logical location... all the while displaying her unique skill set which explains why she's part of this "team". And that skill-set is..... her sexy husky voice and how cute she looks wearing a black beanie.

February 5, 2009 7:18 PM
Jubi
Reply

I’ve been liking Fringe a bit more since its return than I did before, and adding the sister and niece has definitely helped breath a little life into Olivia. Still, I do think that at least part of the problem lies with Torv. I have watched scenes and noticed *exactly* where she could have injected some emotion--not even humor, but just plain emotion--into the character, and she just doesn't do it. There are scenes where Olivia should be feeling things, should have life behind her eyes, and it's just not there.

As for the romance, there is no real sexual tension, but I think there's chemistry. There's warmth there. It's not blistering the screen, but it's nice enough, and I kind of like that it's not some great passionate romance between them, but something simpler and much less dramatic. As long as the future writing continues in that vein, I’m okay with it.

I also agree with another comment about the lazy science. Not just that, but laziness when it comes to creating an immersive environment--people write too fast, people magically know things that should have to be explained to them, people can find files without even being told what file they're looking for, etc. I don’t normally notice that sort of thing, but it really stands out to me here.

February 5, 2009 8:35 PM
Rory
Reply

I agree with these, but I'd expand on number 5 and say jut give all of them better things to say. I'd really like this show if the writing were better. Fire th ones they have andget new ones, I think its worth the risk.

February 5, 2009 10:48 PM
JaySin
Reply

Great Olivia comparison with Reddicks work on the Wire and Lost. I'm still not totally sold on her but shes growing on me a little. Walter rules, but they gotta figure out something to do with Joshua Jacksons character cause everything they throw at us about him seems forced. The show has a ton of potential though and I enjoy it.

February 5, 2009 11:04 PM
Chris
Reply

Honestly, next time they put Olivia in the tank, would it kill her to wear something in a leopard print, maybe a lacy white combo?

February 5, 2009 11:18 PM
laurel
Reply

Totally agree with Rory above - give them ALL better things to say. The writing for this show consists of like 70% rephrasing what someone else said or summarizing what just happened. The actors are carrying their characters by sheer charisma, and they're good cause we all obviously are invested enough to want them to be better.

February 7, 2009 11:46 AM
Colin
Reply

I cannot believe that I disagree with you and obviously most of your readers on just about everything you've listed here. One of the great things about this show is it's subtlety. I think you are missing all of the things going on between the lines.

The romance IS working. Since day one I've seen chemistry between the characters and I couldn't imagine it any other way...she is the reason Peter stayed on in the first place.

I can't completely disagree on the Boston thing except to say that in the mythology, the evil giant company is also located there, so wouldn't most of their tests and workings be there also?

The mythology IS laced throughout the show. As far as you know, everything we've seen is related to the pattern. If they give you all of that information now, they've got no show. The key is taking time and investing in the characters and information BEFORE you learn each new piece of info.

I hated the Kung-Fu bit. It seemed totally out of character for the show...like they were suddenly trying to be Alias.

I wouldn't mind seeing more to Broyles, but I think that's where they are headed anyway. And Astrid does so much without speaking that I do feel like I already know quite a bit about her and love it.

Torv's history wouldn't hurt, but I believe they're holding out for the Peter/Anna scenes to come to bring out her soul...and I personally can't wait!

February 7, 2009 4:52 PM
Angela
Reply

I thought a Peter/Olivia's sister hook-up was in the works. *shrugs*

February 9, 2009 1:48 PM
JTMacc99
Reply

Well, if the problem with Olivia is actually the writing, then I would say we're probably screwed with ALL of the problems. If they can't get me to really like the main character, then it's pretty safe to assume that I'll eventually drift away from this show, regardless of how much I like it right now.

Also, the last two episodes were really good, weren't they? At least some small part of that was the personal moments we shared with both Olivia and with Walter. It's not a coincidence.

February 9, 2009 1:48 PM
JTMacc99
Reply

Well, if the problem with Olivia is actually the writing, then I would say we're probably screwed with ALL of the problems. If they can't get me to really like the main character, then it's pretty safe to assume that I'll eventually drift away from this show, regardless of how much I like it right now.

Also, the last two episodes were really good, weren't they? At least some small part of that was the personal moments we shared with both Olivia and with Walter. It's not a coincidence.

February 9, 2009 11:06 PM
lemon
Reply

I want a Charlie-Liv hook-up :) They better not make him a bad guy.

I like Olivia being the serious humorless person that she is. Not everyone can be bubbly.

February 10, 2009 10:45 AM
Sami
Reply

Agreed...

February 10, 2009 10:46 AM
Sami
Reply

Agreed...

February 10, 2009 11:50 AM
Shelley
Reply

I can't believe no one has mentioned the outside consultant bureaucrat guy who Olivia put in jail and who is now auditing the department. Please, please, please get rid of this guy. When they introduced him, I turned to my husband and said, "Insert work obstacle for the character of Olivia here." He's so obviously a plot device and a bad one at that. A very, very obvious and bad one. Bad writers! Bad! *hits with newspaper*

I agree with everything on this list. This show has potential.

Why does it get a more chances than the better written, more thoroughly awesome Daisies? (still mourning the loss of Ned and Chuck, Olive and Cod).

February 10, 2009 11:57 AM
Shelley
Reply

I can't believe no one has mentioned the outside consultant bureaucrat guy who Olivia put in jail and who is now auditing the department. Please, please, please get rid of this guy. When they introduced him, I turned to my husband and said, "Insert work obstacle for the character of Olivia here." He's so obviously a plot device and a bad one at that. A very, very obvious and bad one. Bad writers! Bad! *hits with newspaper*

I agree with everything on this list. This show has potential.

Why does it get a more chances than the better written, more thoroughly awesome Daisies? (still mourning the loss of Ned and Chuck, Olive and Cod).

February 10, 2009 12:11 PM
kiki
Reply

I'm with Angela--two episodes and the exchange between Peter and Rachel was readily apparent to me. Now, THAT could be hot and make for some interesting story lines.

February 10, 2009 12:20 PM
meredithkb
Reply

I think of this show as "almost good." My husband and I keep watching it, but more as an unintentional comedy than a thriller/drama.

Also, the writing is across the board bad for all the characters, but the actors playing Walter and Peter are just good enough to sell them as full, interesting human beings. So far, A.T. has not been able to do so, but I believe she is a capable actress just not a great one.

February 10, 2009 12:49 PM
first timer
Reply

jeez, enough with the anna torv bashing... nothing more beautiful than watching her run and seeing her boobs bounce up and down... that alone is worth watching; and...

[quote]
Just because she's a woman and he's a man and they work together doesn't mean they need to start hooking up for no reason
[/quote]

ermmm, really? are you serious? you don't watch much tv, do you?

February 10, 2009 1:26 PM
imzadi35
Reply

I agree with all your points save one--the first one. I don't think that the show is leaning towards any type of budding relationship at all. I feel like the show has been more focused on Olivia and John. I would be shocked if there was any attempt at romantic involvement this season. Which(and I do agree with you here) is great because they have no sexual chemistry.

February 10, 2009 1:34 PM
TheLostLenore
Reply

I gave up Fringe, and I can sum the decision up in one word: OLIVIA. The casting and writing for that character are so bad, I really don't think they can fix it. Fatal flaw in a show I was hoping would be good. Well, at least Dollhouse is on soon!

February 10, 2009 1:51 PM
Joker88
Reply

The biggest issue I have with the show is that you can't create a sense of wonder/awe/mystery for the audience if the characters always act like the crazy stuff they encounter is routine. Did you see the cast's "ho-hum" reaction to the ape-man at the plane crash scene? For me, that's the biggest reason this show isn't working.

February 10, 2009 3:14 PM
Faye Bond
Reply
replied to comment from Joker88

I agree: why do the guys in the lab act like telemarketers who've seen it all, even when they agree its so super important and new and cutting edge and all that. guys, get a life: and Oliva, get a character, NOW!

February 10, 2009 3:39 PM
Centaurea
Reply

I was surprised and disappointed with last week's episode in that it was essentially Monster Of The Week, a la X-Files. It was a clear time-waster and interruption in the mythology, and those are rarely interesting. They just need not to go there, especially so early on. Souped up genetics do not equal The Pattern.

And I agree about the govt. bureaucrat--this is far too early in the series to insert a hostile Skinner. It's not like Broyles already tells her everything and trusts her implicitly. What, was he on Lost that week and couldn't be bothered to film?

There is a lot to work with here, and some truly chilling moments, but they've got to watch it or the show will quickly go downhill.

And frankly, I don't like the sister/niece story line at all. It seems even more forced than the romance, and Olivia looks like she's never been around a child.

Plus, since they're so dang determined to make it X-Files The Return, we all know what happens to sisters who stay in mysterious agents' apartments. Hope she has a nice red shirt.

February 10, 2009 3:47 PM
Lisa
Reply

Did anyone else notice the difference in Olivia's character when she was with John in the motel room? She was completely giddy and girly. Just like she is when she's with her niece. I'm thinking she's so cold now because of what she has been through with John.

February 10, 2009 5:01 PM
Wayne Henderson
Reply

I totally agree with most of your points, and have talked about a few of them on my Wayne's Take On FRiNGE podcast as well. The actor that plays Broyles is awesome, but needs more and better lines. And, now offense to people in Boston, but the FRiNGE gang needs to get out of there more often.

I think Olivia's character is great, and is coming along nicely. And now that we, hopefully, have seen the last of John Scott, she can grow even further.

Thanks for posting this article. A lot of good things to ponder as FRiNGE moves forward!

February 10, 2009 5:05 PM
Ottis
Reply

Gave up after 5 episodes or so because the show seemed to try too hard to be gross while not trying hard enough to be coherent or different. It was like the X-Files or Alias with a bludgeon. A shame, because I like the genre.

February 10, 2009 5:18 PM
Wms
Reply

-I too thought there was a nod in the direction of a Peter/Olivia's sister relationship. I'm totally in favor of that.

-I don't mind Olivia's lack of personality so much, because that in itself is personality. She's the uber-grownup with her bruised heart and her baggage and her crushing sense of responsibility for the entire world, etc ... but yeah, she needs some more room to play with that, and prove that's what it is. Fistfight with her sister when she's nosy about John? A nervous breakdown? Learning to make LSD from Walter "just for fun"? Give us something else.

- Being the only one in the world who hasn't seen The Wire or Lost, I don't know Lance Reddick's work. I trust you that he's great, but he also needs a chance to show it. I wouldn't mind an episode that's a day in the life of Broyles. He is definitely hiding stuff from Olivia, and I'm interested to know if it's because he chooses to, or because stuff is being hidden from him.

- You know what could accomplish lots of this? Flashbacks. I mean ones of live people, with no tank required. I know not everyone can do it like Aaron Sorkin, but West Wing did it beautifully. Two Cathedrals and In the Shadow of Two Gunmen felt like a payoff for caring so much about the characters. Maybe Fringe can use them like a bribe to care?

February 10, 2009 5:32 PM
awbeans
Reply

I don't know if anyone's mentioned this but as a fan of all things sci-fi I find it a chore to watch this show. I can't pinpoint the problem but maybe it's Pacey, maybe it's that I doubt that the actress playing Olivia could pass a physical training test for any government agent, maybe it's that it's just not that well written. Whatever it is, I stopped watching weeks ago.

February 10, 2009 6:38 PM
Livy
Reply

What about actually giving Peter some significance? Right now he doesn't have anything to do but babysit his dad.

February 10, 2009 8:56 PM
BlogDog
Reply

The only way to fix is to flush the handle. This is another steaming loaf from the JJ Abrams crap factory.

February 10, 2009 11:59 PM
Emma
Reply

~The other day Angel and I were talking about the show and came to the realization that if someone watching hadn't watched The Wire or Lost, and just had Broyles's scenes to go on, they might think Lance Reddick isn't worth crap as an actor~

Set your mind at ease on that count at least; I'd never seen the actor before Fringe, but Broyles is my favorite character. I agree that he needs more to do, though!

(And that 'outside consultant bureaucrat guy', AKA Vogler/Tritter, needs to go.)

February 11, 2009 12:00 AM
Emma
Reply

~The other day Angel and I were talking about the show and came to the realization that if someone watching hadn't watched The Wire or Lost, and just had Broyles's scenes to go on, they might think Lance Reddick isn't worth crap as an actor~

Set your mind at ease on that count at least; I'd never seen the actor before Fringe, but Broyles is my favorite character. I agree that he needs more to do, though!

(And that 'outside consultant bureaucrat guy', AKA Vogler/Tritter, needs to go.)

February 11, 2009 4:43 AM
Annie
Reply

I totally agree, especially with stop-forcing-that-wierd-romance point. That romance thing (namely "a man and a woman can't work anywhere near each other let alone together without getting involved") has destroyed a lot of great shows already, but they just don't seem to learn, do they... I'm cringing every time they try to force it down our throats with not-so-subtle hints, or worse - when 3rd party (Walter mostly) act like a cheerleader or something about the whole thing.

Also, I must say, there's one more thing that's been bugging me since episode 3. It's been nicely nutshelled by Livy above. I mean, Peter is supposed to be a friggin awesome genius, yet so far almost everyone (including Astrid and Olivia) seems to be much more smarter, and he's stuck with babysitting and translating for his dad. That's sooo not what I was looking forward to when he was first introduced in Pilot. They really should start utilizing his allegedly genius intellectual level more, cause for far it really feels like a letdown.

February 11, 2009 5:19 AM
Nadine
Reply

I agreeeee, I'm the same with Olivia, it pisses me orf she's the main character when she's so...blah.
I agree with Annie above me too, so far we've seen that Peter is smart to enough to yeah, translate for Walter. How about some moments of brilliance from him, or some more background, we know he's had an..interesting childhood and life to say the least, how about more of that, and more explanation as to his possible powers? In the episode the Observer first REALLY appeared in, Peter had knowledge he, we where told, couldn't have known. Then in last weeks episode it SEEMED he did the same thing, he came up with that stuff about Oxford either because he's a genius who retains things without knowing it, or because maybe he can pluck information out of peoples brains.
I also have a theory Peter isn't the original Peter, I think he's a clone and that the real Peter died either in that crash or the from the fever he had as a child, Walter has hinted Peter has no medical history, AND that stuff about fathers and sons in the Benjamin Button like episode with the rapidly aging baby. I think Peter is an expirment himself and i'd like to see that explored, but that's more projecting than anything =)
I'll stick with the show because I think Abrams has more of an idea and conclusion for this than he ever did with Lost(lets face it, they came up with the premise for that show and got handed wads of cash before anyone decided what the Island was) so I'd love to see it flesh out and believe it will...it...just needs to hurry its ass up!

February 11, 2009 5:22 AM
Nadine
Reply

I agreeeee, I'm the same with Olivia, it pisses me orf she's the main character when she's so...blah.
I agree with Annie above me too, so far we've seen that Peter is smart to enough to yeah, translate for Walter. How about some moments of brilliance from him, or some more background, we know he's had an..interesting childhood and life to say the least, how about more of that, and more explanation as to his possible powers? In the episode the Observer first REALLY appeared in, Peter had knowledge he, we where told, couldn't have known. Then in last weeks episode it SEEMED he did the same thing, he came up with that stuff about Oxford either because he's a genius who retains things without knowing it, or because maybe he can pluck information out of peoples brains.
I also have a theory Peter isn't the original Peter, I think he's a clone and that the real Peter died either in that crash or the from the fever he had as a child, Walter has hinted Peter has no medical history, AND that stuff about fathers and sons in the Benjamin Button like episode with the rapidly aging baby. I think Peter is an expirment himself and i'd like to see that explored, but that's more projecting than anything =)
I'll stick with the show because I think Abrams has more of an idea and conclusion for this than he ever did with Lost(lets face it, they came up with the premise for that show and got handed wads of cash before anyone decided what the Island was) so I'd love to see it flesh out and believe it will...it...just needs to hurry its ass up!

February 11, 2009 8:37 AM
jay
Reply

less peter. he's basically useless. i actually like the fact that olivia is so "lifeless". makes her more intriguing actually. maybe she's channeling fox mulder (without the obsession).

February 11, 2009 10:11 AM
Ellen
Reply

I love the show, all the characters are great. I'm not a sci-fi fan but I love the humor. I wish for a romance between Olivia and Peter eventually. And Oh, Olivia and John Scott are married in real life.

February 11, 2009 10:11 AM
Ellen
Reply

I love the show, all the characters are great. I'm not a sci-fi fan but I love the humor. I wish for a romance between Olivia and Peter eventually. And Oh, Olivia and John Scott are married in real life.

February 11, 2009 8:57 PM
Kevin
Reply

I've kinda enjoyed the show. No where near as much as I enjoy Lost but its been a fun kill time. I think that if they took these suggestions though, that maybe this show would become something great.

February 12, 2009 9:25 PM
SJ
Reply

I have this theory that Astrid's going to turn into some secret double agent who's been recruiting Olivia since the beginning. Of course, that just might be because her character has so little to do that she looks like she's quietly plotting something because she has nothing else to do.
I wish they'd focus on Olivia and Charlie's relationship, they have way more chemistry than Olivia and Peter.

February 16, 2009 11:46 AM
X-opher
Reply

I agree with most of the posters above, however I want to bring up the cavelier way Fox programs it. They showed perhaps one of the best episodes of the series and then it's gone for six weeks. Okay, I kindof get the holiday vacation, but then after it's return (on Inauguration Day?), and four episodes on, again ending with a great episode, it is now on hiatus for 6 weeks until April! So we can have more American damned Idol. I liked the show but this disregard for the viewers by the Fox programmers is unacceptable. As far as I'm concerned, the show ended last Tuesday.

May 8, 2009 1:44 AM
fat_rabbit_kemz
Reply
replied to comment from Krista

It was a common cold virus.

June 1, 2011 2:38 AM
www.televisionwithoutpity.com
Reply

6 ways to fix fringe.. Huh, really? :)

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

January 2012

12 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries