BLOGS
UGH! I could just about kill the judges on American Idol sometimes. Last night was almost unbearable in its utter stinkdom and proved to me beyond the shadow of a doubt that these people are effing hacks who know nothing about music. I might be the last person on Earth to discover this, and if you were planning to point that out to me, just shhhhhhhhhhhhhh. In an effort to apply the valuable lessons I've been learning in reading my bedside tome, Anger Management for Dummies, I'm going to attempt to put forth some clear, concise and well-reasoned issues I had with the things uttered by these fools last night so as to avoid blowing a damned gasket and having a spontaneous brain aneurysm from sheer rage. Bear with me.
1) Kara's criticism for Taylor was just completely and utterly ridiculous. From a musical perspective, she was one of the best performances of the night by a mile. Kara and Co. kept on reiterating that they didn't have a clear sense of who she was, but with the exception of, say, Nathaniel and Adam and some of the more conspicuous drama queens or the people with the really sad backstories (Scott, Danny), does anyone really know who these contestants are at this point? And on that note, does anyone else notice how when Kara is the first one to speak, she's totally at a loss as to what sort of feedback to give? Most of the time she ends up saying something completely innocuous and meaningless, and the other part of the time, she simply gloms on to whatever the other judges are saying. I dug her during the audition process 'cause it seemed like she had an actual point of view, but now she's more like a perky zombie than someone with any actual music expertise.
2) I get that people love Scott but are the judges really going to convince America that this dude deserves to go to the next round purely on the strength of his disability and overcoming the odds and all that stupid crap? He's not the worst singer ever, but his was definitely one of the weaker performances. And I don't care how likeable he is, that's not enough to justify his moving forward. If being likeable was the only criteria, my man Alex Wagner-Trugman would have the title in his pocket.
3) The fact that Randy kept on mistakenly comparing Nathaniel and his weird '80s work-out headband to Elton John when clearly what he meant was Olivia Newton-John (he even tried to name-check the song "Let's Get Physical," but he only got the "physical" part out of his mouth) was insanely infuriating. And Simon didn't even seem to notice his huge, glaring error. Yet he gave it to Paula for mispronouncing ABBA. Foul!
4) Paula to Kristen: "When you were in Hollywood, you sang a Kelly Clarkson song, 'Because of You.' That showed the range of your voice. That was what I expected from you. This song is a little more safe for you but what it does show is that you've got a helluva range." Ummm, what? So you're saying you wish she'd chosen a song that showed her range because that's what she did during Hollywood week, but at least this song showed her range. Gotcha. Good feedback, Googly Eyes!
5) Who here found it odd and disturbing that everyone kept insistently comparing Lil Rounds to Fantasia when her voice sounds absolutely nothing like hers? Was the comparison simply that she's a young black woman with a short haircut? Because wow. It seems like more often than not, the judges' only frame of references is previous Idol contestants, and half the time the comparisons aren't even apt. I still fail to see the similarities between Von and Clay, though Angel maintains that they dress a lot alike and have a similar "aw shucks" vibe to them. My point is, can we start name-checking some non-Idol artists now and again? If I hear one more Kelly Clarkson reference I'm gonna beat Randy over the head with a microphone stand. Jacob will help.
That said, when Simon referred to the "I would do anything for love but I just WON'T DO THAT" lyric in Nathaniel's Meatloaf cover by saying "Nathaniel, I think you probably would," it almost almost made up for the general fuckery of the evening. Way to say what me and the rest of America were thinking, Mr. Cowell.
Are you people as disgusted as little old moi about last night's judgments, or am I a fruit loop? Please advise in the comments.
2) I get that people love Scott but are the judges really going to convince America that this dude deserves to go to the next round purely on the strength of his disability and overcoming the odds and all that stupid crap? He's not the worst singer ever, but his was definitely one of the weaker performances. And I don't care how likeable he is, that's not enough to justify his moving forward. If being likeable was the only criteria, my man Alex Wagner-Trugman would have the title in his pocket.
3) The fact that Randy kept on mistakenly comparing Nathaniel and his weird '80s work-out headband to Elton John when clearly what he meant was Olivia Newton-John (he even tried to name-check the song "Let's Get Physical," but he only got the "physical" part out of his mouth) was insanely infuriating. And Simon didn't even seem to notice his huge, glaring error. Yet he gave it to Paula for mispronouncing ABBA. Foul!
4) Paula to Kristen: "When you were in Hollywood, you sang a Kelly Clarkson song, 'Because of You.' That showed the range of your voice. That was what I expected from you. This song is a little more safe for you but what it does show is that you've got a helluva range." Ummm, what? So you're saying you wish she'd chosen a song that showed her range because that's what she did during Hollywood week, but at least this song showed her range. Gotcha. Good feedback, Googly Eyes!
5) Who here found it odd and disturbing that everyone kept insistently comparing Lil Rounds to Fantasia when her voice sounds absolutely nothing like hers? Was the comparison simply that she's a young black woman with a short haircut? Because wow. It seems like more often than not, the judges' only frame of references is previous Idol contestants, and half the time the comparisons aren't even apt. I still fail to see the similarities between Von and Clay, though Angel maintains that they dress a lot alike and have a similar "aw shucks" vibe to them. My point is, can we start name-checking some non-Idol artists now and again? If I hear one more Kelly Clarkson reference I'm gonna beat Randy over the head with a microphone stand. Jacob will help.
That said, when Simon referred to the "I would do anything for love but I just WON'T DO THAT" lyric in Nathaniel's Meatloaf cover by saying "Nathaniel, I think you probably would," it almost almost made up for the general fuckery of the evening. Way to say what me and the rest of America were thinking, Mr. Cowell.
Are you people as disgusted as little old moi about last night's judgments, or am I a fruit loop? Please advise in the comments.
TAGS: american idol
Sponsored Links
10 Comments
Loading...
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Friday, January 20, 2012
The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
How Up All Night Is Like Real Life: TV Cheaters Never Prosper
Parks and Recreation: Where Have We Seen That Before?
TWoP 10: Weirdest Jobs on Reality TV
Friday, January 20, 2012: Shark Tank
Haywire: She Can't Be Tamed
Red Tails: Up, Up and Away
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Telefile
January 2012
55 Entries
December 2011
49 Entries
November 2011
56 Entries
October 2011
74 Entries
September 2011
78 Entries
August 2011
61 Entries
July 2011
56 Entries
June 2011
57 Entries
May 2011
57 Entries
April 2011
78 Entries
March 2011
73 Entries
February 2011
57 Entries
January 2011
65 Entries
December 2010
39 Entries
November 2010
45 Entries
October 2010
46 Entries
September 2010
62 Entries
August 2010
55 Entries
July 2010
53 Entries
June 2010
65 Entries
May 2010
59 Entries
April 2010
57 Entries
March 2010
67 Entries
February 2010
53 Entries
January 2010
59 Entries
December 2009
32 Entries
November 2009
47 Entries
October 2009
65 Entries
September 2009
66 Entries
August 2009
58 Entries
July 2009
72 Entries
June 2009
71 Entries
May 2009
50 Entries
April 2009
57 Entries
March 2009
66 Entries
February 2009
52 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
71 Entries
October 2008
88 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
120 Entries
July 2008
115 Entries
June 2008
90 Entries
May 2008
44 Entries
April 2008
30 Entries
March 2008
26 Entries
February 2008
30 Entries
January 2008
44 Entries
December 2007
31 Entries
November 2007
66 Entries
1. I totally agree with Kara's criticism...although I will agree that she mispoke when she first tried explaining it. She doesn't mean that we need to know their backstories, but that we need to see who they are as performers. Someone siniging a generic big song that we hear every year, exactly as it was written doesn't say anything about the performer. At this point all that will make a contestant memorable is a big number that showcases why they are unique and deserve a chance (like Adam Lambert's performance last week - from that one song, we know a lot more about him and how he performs than we do Taylor) Also, her loss of what to say when she's first comes largely from the fact that her on-air persona isn't fully formed yet. When someone isn't good, she can't be over the top mean (that's Simon's schtick), she can't divert by talking about how pretty they are (that's Paula's thing) and she can't just spout a bunch of "dog" references...obviously. She's just still working on figuring out what SHE can do when a contestant kinda sucks.
2) Scott should be moving forward, not because of any disability, but because of his uniqueness in this competition and his passion for music. Note that in his interview he was one of the only contestants in 3 weeks to talk about how his performance could be better rahter than how much "fun" it was...that is an artist, not someone looking for quick fame and money.
3) Randy is fairly clueless sometimes.
4) Paula mispoke, but you have to admit she is much more coherent this year. She has been mostly making sense, even though she misspoke this time (on the last part she did not mean range...she meant power)
5) They can't compare them to non-idol artists without saying that they are copy-catting. However, in comparing to past idols, they do not mean that they are a carbon copy of said idol. They mean that they remind them of how that person was in the competition. Lil Rounds is coming on strong right away with a powerful voice, like Fantasia did. Von is a meeker competitor who has a solid tone, but may be more at home with musicals than as a rocking frontman, much like Clay.
It's all in how you look at it.
All of that sounds mroe lile "rationalization" than "perspective"
The worst part of watching this was the fact that I was stuck in a hospital waiting room and wasn't allowed to change the channel. The best part of the show was when the Tracy Chapman song some twit had just butchered came on my ipod two seconds after she was done. So I turned on the BSG podcast in my ipod and ignored the rest of the show.
The "judging" last night was worse than usual for sure, but I still didn't find it as irritating as seventeen page long weecaps of a single episode.
The "judging" last night was worse than usual for sure, but I still didn't find it as irritating as seventeen page long weecaps of a single episode.
Pithy!
The only problem I have with the judges is Randy.
He's not making an effort to try, and how little he keeps up with (or remembers) music is starting to show a lot, especially next to criticism from Kara (which usually offers some direct comparison).
I have a hard time being disappointed with Kara's critiques because she literally has Randy to her right and Paula to her left; at best neither are coherent and at worst neither are relevant.
Someone could leave a chainsaw running on the stage and Paula would applaud its courage and the beauty of its instrument...but that's not inconsistent, is it? Randy, on the other hand, will mumble about how he totally digs but he really felt like that was pitchy, and yo, that wasn't the best choice dawg. Maybe if you picked something a little -ier and messed with the arrangement it'd be a hit, but just, just a bad choice dawg.
Simon and Paula are as consistent as they've always been (Simon won't spend much effort on his critiques unless he wants you to win or wants you to lose...otherwise he'll offer judgment until the music starts or until you do something stupid like argue with him).
Oops! Randy should have read:
Randy, on the other hand, will mumble about how he totally digs (genre) but he really felt like that was pitchy, and yo, that wasn't the best choice dawg. Maybe if you picked something a little (gender)-ier or (modern/classic) and messed with the arrangement it'd be a hit, but just, just a bad choice dawg.
Totally agree with you on the judging. The handpicking was more obvious because the judges were so clumsy at erasing some and promoting others. Taylor's song was one of the best of the night. I loved her revenge in the group number the next night--totally outshone everybody else with all that personality Kara complained was absent. The camera kept cutting her out because she towered over everyone else--literally and figuratively. Simon's gut punch to Von by equating him with Clay was classic. Other than that, this show blows.
I too was frustrated by Randy's confusion of Elton with Olivia Newton. But what really gets me is how the judges put nutty Tatiana back in - didn't the audience get rid of her first chance they got? I can't even watch her. I think that Simon, as a producer, has been advancing people like her and Norman not because of talent (Norman? Really.) but because controversy makes good press.
The judges don't need to convince anyone that Scott should go through because of his disabillity-he and Lil Rounds were the best of the night by a country mile. The only person who's alleged he's moving forward because of his disability is you and it makes you sound like, well, an asshole.