BLOGS

Just Hear Me Out: The Case for Adam Lambert

by Mindy Monez March 18, 2009 2:32 PM
Just Hear Me Out: The Case for Adam Lambert So last night on American Idol Adam Lambert turned a popular Johnny Cash song into a faux Middle Eastern new wave snake-charming chantey, and then the internet exploded. With hatred for Adam Lambert. Which then caused me to explode with hatred for the internet, because Adam Lambert is the best thing that's ever happened to American Idol, and I'll tell you why.


He's not boring.
Anoop, for arbitrary example, is an interesting guy on a personal level because he's really smart and it's always fascinating to see a really smart person on a reality show, but he's a dull, wedding band-level singer. A lot of the other contestants are likable and have "a story," which is relevant on this show for reasons surpassing logic, but I don't care about them because they are boring. Allison Iraheta is the only exception I can think of, because she seems crazy in a good way, and she can actually sing, but she's not half the entertainer Adam is. Can you imagine going to an Adam Lambert concert? With production, costumes and a set list that Adam Lambert has complete creative control over? Even Madonna would be like, "Damn! It's only a concert! Tone it down!"

He's a risk taker.
When other Idol contestants defend their performances by saying "I took a risk," they usually mean "I sang a boring and/or too hard for me song." Or in Megan's unique "Rockin' Robin" case, a stupid and mind-blowingly irrelevant song. When Adam Lambert defends his risks, he's defending turning "Ring of Fire" into an over-the-top belly dancing routine, and doing it well. You can't tell me the man doesn't have a vision.

He's the best singer there.
The guy's range is incredible, and he sings circles around all the other contestants every week. I hear a lot of complaints about him being too musical theater, and I don't think that's inaccurate, I just don't think that's inherently a criticism. What does that even mean? He's a classically trained super-ham with great stage presence? It's not like he's going out there all the guy from the Bring It On auditions who sings "Give My Regards to Broadway"; he sings pop songs in a pop way. It's just that his voice is so perfect technically that he sounds like you paid 85 bucks to sit and listen to him sing. He's a more creative Aiken with a Christian Siriano haircut and a trunk full of Lincoln Park After Dark, and I don't think that's a bad thing. I think it's a fantastic thing.

He's unique without being terrible.
Which is more than I can say for Megan, who they keep calling unique because she dances weird. To borrow the old Top Chef fan pastime, it's called American Idol, not American Can'tdance.

On a side note, Dial Idol is predicting that Adam's safe tonight, which is great, but it's also showing Danny Gokey as getting the most damn votes last night. I actually don't think he's that terrible, but why, why, why is he so insurmountably popular? Why? I don't think it's the dead wife thing anymore, I really don't. But I also don't understand what the hell else it could be, because he's not that great of a singer. Has America lost its mind?

56 Comments

March 18, 2009 3:38 PM
Brixtonville
Reply

As far as Danny Gokey is concerned, he just parlayed his dead wife and unending grief into loving Jesus and purity rings. And his dead wife.

If you really wonder who's voting for him, think mothers and tweens who love Twilight and the Jonas Brothers. Soon they'll stop voting for Scott and focus intently on their new idol.

March 18, 2009 3:58 PM
PubMed
Reply

It seems to me, that with Gokey/Scott/etc. AI is desperately hoping to cover the Contemporary Christian music marker - just like they hoped with Archuleta.

March 18, 2009 4:09 PM
becca.elpy
Reply

Adam creeps me out. I'm fully prepared to be blasted for that. If the point of country week is to sing country, he failed.

Gokey isn't Sanjaya. I'll leave it at that.

March 18, 2009 4:18 PM
Craig
Reply

Because America may allow AI contestants to have a penis, as long as they never, ever imply they know what to do with it. Brixtonville hit the nail on the head: voters want the safe, nice boy who is happy with holding hands and Waiting For Marriage. Meanwhile, Adam is the bad boy who wants you to Touch Him There.

Add to that the shocking originality (people complain about the homogenized AI year after year, but still manage to shit the bed when someone breaks the mold) and alternative sexuality (AI voters will vote for an openly gay contestant the day he/she graduates Jesus camp and forsakes same sex lovin'), and you have a contestant that doesn't fit into the nice, neat Ken Doll box that voters are comfortable with. Also, he eyefucks them until they're sore.

March 18, 2009 4:19 PM
imrastro
Reply
replied to comment from becca.elpy

That's not the point as repeatedly stated by Simon.

March 18, 2009 4:41 PM
sarah
Reply

[q]If the point of country week is to sing country, he failed.[/q]

I agree. Adam is a fantastic singer and performer, but last night he sucked at singing a classic country song. He made it un-country (and I'm not a big country music fan.)

March 18, 2009 5:00 PM
bree
Reply

Also, he eyefucks them until they're sore.
...and boy do we like it! More more more!

March 18, 2009 5:10 PM
redrabbit
Reply

I utterly loved Adam last night. It was an awesome version of a song I grew sick of ages ago - he made me like it again. Go Adam!

March 18, 2009 5:13 PM
dorothy
Reply

I loved Adam's performance. Well, maybe "loved" is a bit strong. I was riveted by it. I couldn't agree with all the choices he made throughout the song, but I do think he was the most interesting and talented person up there. Especially compared with the parade of cheesy God-ballads and patriotism we were "treated" to. Yikes.

March 18, 2009 6:04 PM
muzjik
Reply

If someone had asked Adam to do a campy, over-the-top parody of an emo boy singing country, that's what it would have looked like. The fact that he has a great voice didn't make it less campy.

March 18, 2009 6:23 PM
supertramp
Reply

I wasn't a big fan of the Lambert until last night, mainly because everytime I hear him sing I think of Iron Maiden's "Run to the Hills." But last night's performance was excruciatingly entertaining-I thought the guy was going to go down on the mic stand right there in front of Simon and Ryan and all the fuzzy-kitten-shirted moms and yet-to-truly-understand-what-sexuality-means tweens who've been voting for Scott (who I don't mind, but that doesn't mean I'm going to back someone JUST because the dude's blind-that would be patronizing)and Gokey all along. And I loved it. I felt a little assaulted, but I loved it.

The comment that Lambert failed on country night because he didn't sing country is a faulty argument. If that were true, why would the judges be telling Lil to add a little R%B flavor if the point of the night was to sing "true" country? And if he had stayed true to the original, then wouldn't they bitch that he lost his personality in country night? I understand the comments that it was weird and it made people feel uncomfortable, but those are the exact reasons I became a fan last night. I couldn't believe I was watching that LIVE on AI. Holy frijole.

March 18, 2009 6:46 PM
LB
Reply

Adam's schtick has been done and it's been done better. Even the most daring people on this show - Blake, David Cook and Daughtry - knew not to treat country night as something they couldn't be bothered with. Adam felt he was better than the assignment which is a shame because I bet if he had actually tried, he could have been original instead of stealing from another contestant on another reality show. As it was, that performance was lazy. Give me Anoop and Matt (your so-called boring contestants) because they're actually trying.

And I'm tired of the attitude that I must be a homophobe because I didn't get it.

March 18, 2009 7:08 PM
Hmmmm
Reply

I'm not sure why "country music" is viewed with such reverence that no one is allowed to play around with variations on the original songs. Are we unsettled when we hear something different than what we expect? Sure. Does that make it "bad"? Nope.
I thought Adam was spectacularly ballsy in doing what he knows how to do on America's greatest blandifying stage. Bravo.

March 18, 2009 7:11 PM
Hmmmm
Reply

I'm not sure why "country music" is viewed with such reverence that no one is allowed to play around with variations on the original songs. Are we unsettled when we hear something different than what we expect? Sure. Does that make it "bad"? Nope.
I thought Adam was spectacularly ballsy in doing what he knows how to do on America's greatest blandifying stage. Bravo.

March 18, 2009 7:12 PM
Hmmmm
Reply

I'm not sure why "country music" is viewed with such reverence that no one is allowed to play around with variations on the original songs. Are we unsettled when we hear something different than what we expect? Sure. Does that make it "bad"? Nope.
I thought Adam was spectacularly ballsy in doing what he knows how to do on America's greatest blandifying stage. Bravo.

March 18, 2009 7:14 PM
Hmmm(now blushing)
Reply

Apologizing for multiple posts...not sure how that happened?

March 18, 2009 7:21 PM
LB
Reply

It's not country night specifically but the fact that Adam seemed to treat country night like it didn't deserve his attention or effort. None of the others I mentioned (Blake, David, Chris) above are country singers and knew they never would be, but they definitely tried to do something with it. They didn't act like they were better than the assignment.

Adam had me last week but he lost me this week when so many of the others worked pretty hard to make a difficult week work.

March 18, 2009 7:22 PM
TFLS
Reply

Lambert rocked the Kasbah last night - and in more ways than one. I for one am totally on the Adam bandwagon - I'm leading the charge, in fact. And you're dead to rights about the internet hate-fest. Just read the comments over at YouTube. Far too many people seem concerned with what Adam does in bed. Me? I want to watch the man perform on stage - not in a porn video (though he’s done wonders for my fantasy life!). So I say Yay! Adam. It's about time American Idol proffered up someone less about pap and more into knock you on your ass, here comes Ziggy Stardust rock-n-roll.

March 18, 2009 7:43 PM
aislinn
Reply

I'm all about the performance, and damn, but that was a riveting performance. I think the weekly "themes" can get fairly ridiculous, as some of them are just not at all suited to some/most of the performer's styles(c'mon - Neil Diamond, Dolly Parton??). I have no problem with an artist taking a piece well outside their genre and giving it a twist that showcases what makes them a dynamic and interesting performer. Sure, Adam's version of Ring of Fire will never hit the country charts, but I can just picture him driving the crowd wild with it in the middle of a concert of his own songs. He actually reminds me a lot of Elvis and all of the uproar about the way he moved his hips when he performed. People were scandalized by him, but few could deny now that he was a lasting star - I think Adam has that same quality.

March 18, 2009 8:21 PM
enferdame
Reply

I haven't watched AI in quite some time, but my mom was watching it when I was at her house. His performance has hooked me into it again. I thought it was completely out there and different, and done well. It would have been a disaster, I feel, if he'd done it, scuse the phrase, straight.
I'm all in favor of letting your freak flag fly, especially if you've got the chops to back it up, which he does.
As for messing with the song, other people have messed with plenty of classic songs, to actually pretty good results. And as other people have mentioned elsewhere, Cash himself probably would have loved this rendition of it, given that he was into experimenting with music and mixing genres. Music is a personal thing, I think, and there's is nothing wrong with taking a song and bringing out new meanings by changing the arrangement entirely. For instance, Dolly Parton's "I Will Always Love You" is great when sung by her, but then there's Whitney's version. And then there's the ever popular "Over the Rainbow" which has been done so many times so many different ways. And really, the best ones are the ones that are farthest from Judy Garland's own version.

March 18, 2009 8:32 PM
Risti
Reply

I haven't watched one episode of AI this season, but this description is making me think back to Jacob Hoggard's Space Oddity days on Canadian Idol 2 (look it up on youtube). For better or worse, Jacob/Hedley remains probably the most successful post-CI artist (and he didn't even win). Can anyone confirm or deny the similarities for me?

March 18, 2009 9:20 PM
EH
Reply

Adam's Ring of Fire made me love him. That came out dirtier than I intended it to be.

Honestly, though, I have watched so many reality TV shows -not just AI/Pop Idol/X factor, but ALL competitive reality TV shows -where the contestants are just a 'cast', playing the roles they're meant to, filling their niche, never stepping outside of the reality TV paradigm. That performance just convinced me that Adam Lambert isn't just the 'emo' contestant -he is actually a batshit crazy beautiful unique performer who will do something which makes no sense in reality TV verse. He's like a prophet.

Also, he has an incredible voice. He could sing anything. He's technically proficient beyond all of the others. Instead of just resting on this, or toning himself down to be just good enough but not polarising, he does crazy stuff which he wants to do. I believe he is a unique person. Which is so special on one of these shows.

March 18, 2009 11:02 PM
Obo
Reply

I loved Adam's performance last night. After mostly paying little attention while working on something else, he made me stop and notice. His voice is beautiful. Then, I went to another room to ask my spouse if he had seen it--he had, and had the opposite reaction, really not understanding or liking it, although he had to give it up that Adam's voice is amazing. He is crazy and that is good. I hope the show doesn't break him, but there seems to be no sign of that. His style is not what I listen to regularly, but I think I'd buy an album of his, just to hear his voice. I kept telling my husband, forget the genre or how out there the performance was, just close your eyes and listen. A miracle.

March 18, 2009 11:04 PM
Scott Schrantz
Reply

"If the point of country week is to sing country, he failed."

I think we've hit on the real meat of the issue. There are two main camps here, and a performance like Adam's can really polarize you into one camp or the other. Some people think American Idol is a karaoke contest, where you sing songs everybody knows and stay close to the way they originally sounded. Wow the audience with your vocal skills, throw in a few glory notes, get Paula up and dancing, and you're golden.

The other camp wants American Idol to be more of a cover song contest, where the vocals are important, but they're only a part of the whole package. These people are looking for interesting arrangements, daring song choice, and the kind of reimagining of songs that you see when real artists do a cover song.

Which camp you're in informs the way you judge the performances on Idol, the way you react to people like Adam and Blake Lewis. If you talk about desecrating a classic song, or being "better than" the theme, odds are you're in the first camp and are looking for somebody to sing the song the same way you've heard it a hundred times before. I mostly identify with the other camp, the one that wants to see the performers bring creativity not only in their vocals but in the whole feel of the song. Bend the genre, break the theme. The point of country week is not to "sing country", it's to perform a song that comes from the country genre. Where you take it is up to you, and from where I sit, the farther the better. I listen to Coverville.com all the time, and I've heard far weirder versions of Ring of Fire.

I'm still not sold on Adam. I see guyliner and black nails and I instinctively tune out. But he's making me take notice, which is more than I can say for a good 2/3 of these people.

March 18, 2009 11:09 PM
oscrapit
Reply

I still haven't decided if I loved or hated the performance. It did make me smile. The thing I enjoyed about David Cook last year was that he did songs differently than the original covers. But on Andrew Lloyd Webber night, he sang "The Music of the Night" straight (no pun intended). I think it's great that Adam did such a non-country version on Grand Ole Opry night. I just hope that at some point he'll perform a song "unplugged." Because he has a beautiful voice.

March 19, 2009 12:22 AM
KQ1021
Reply

I must be in the minority here, but I thought the performance was just plain awful. While I agree that he can sing, the over-the-top screeching is just too much for me. He's wailing like an 80's hair band lead singer who's fighting with a deranged cat. Not my cup of tea. I'll give respect to trying to make his own thing out of the song, but I just don't see the appeal. And stop with the Constantine eyes. Just stop.

March 19, 2009 3:25 AM
seahawk
Reply

Who says country can't be interesting? Adam makes it interesting, innovative, and totally enjoyable. That version should be the theme for the next James Bond movie...think about it!??? He makes AI interesting and is always, always, on pitch...

March 19, 2009 7:36 AM
Julie
Reply

I don't care, I love Adam. He's awesome.

March 19, 2009 9:03 AM
Gina
Reply

You're not the only one KQ1021. As a theater major with off-broadway experience, guys like Adam are a dime a dozen. But they do it better. Take away the makeup, the polish, the hair and the creepy eye****ing and Adam isn't all that. His upper range is shrieky and doesn't have good tone. It's like an emo-kid who doesn't know if he wants to be a drag queen or a rock star. If he were 16, I'd understand. Except he's 26.

March 19, 2009 10:25 AM
amye
Reply

Count me as another who dislike Adam intensly.

Sure he's "entertaining" in the 'look-at-the-monkey-do-stupid-things-for-the-idiots-with-the-cameras' kinda way.

Could he have a Broadway career? Most definitely. Could he have a RECORDING career? No way in H*ll.

March 19, 2009 10:29 AM
Cindy McLennan
Reply

I heard Adam's rendition of "Ring of Fire" a half dozen times before I saw the performance. My kids watch AI over and over, and I'm usually working in the next room. My daughter (who's only 10) thought it was creepy. My older son thought it was good. When I was only listening, not watching, I liked what I heard. To be fair, I only paid attention to the chorus. I was intrigued, because I could hear k.d. lang in Adam's vocals. When I watched and paid attention to how he handled the verses, I was less impressed than when I was just listening to him nail the refrain.

The man has pipes and he has presence. I do think, though, that Cash is a musical genius, and that Adam took the easy way out on this song.

I don't want to listen to note-for-note, beat-for-beat sing-alikes, but I want to get a feeling that the artist is connecting with the song. Watching him made me feel like he was missing so much, and yes, that he thought it was beneath him.

I agree with pretty much everything Mandy says in the blog entry. I think he belongs on AI and I think he'll continue to make the season interesting. I also think he'll have a career, whether or not he wins the competition. To me, having him on this season is a win for him and for the show.

March 19, 2009 10:48 AM
tntnb
Reply

He just doesn't have any soul, as far as I'm concerned. I don't get an emotional connection to him when he's singing -- I don't sense that HE has an emotional connection to what he's singing. He's theatrical, he's a great showman, he can hit lots of crazy notes -- but he doesn't MOVE me.

Not to say that he doesn't or shouldn't move you. To each his own. But the "if-you-don't-like-Adam-you're-a-goof" viewpoint has become tiresome.

March 19, 2009 10:49 AM
Justine
Reply

You know what really makes me happy?

That the more I search out Adam Lambert and Ring of Fire on the internet since the original backlash after the performance the more I read people stepping forth and commenting on what I agree as the truth of the performance. It was liberating, amazing, vocally pitch perfect and compelling, dramatic, sexual, over the top, brave and just flat out wow. Lambert makes the rest of the contestants sound like amateurs. They’re not even in his league.

March 19, 2009 10:55 AM
tntnb
Reply

He just doesn't have any soul, as far as I'm concerned. I don't get an emotional connection to him when he's singing -- I don't sense that HE has an emotional connection to what he's singing. He's theatrical, he's a great showman, he can hit lots of crazy notes -- but he doesn't MOVE me.

Not to say that he doesn't or shouldn't move you. To each his own. But the "if-you-don't-like-Adam-you're-a-goof" viewpoint has become tiresome.

March 19, 2009 12:32 PM
Meg
Reply

I love Jesus. I love Twilight. I actually voted for David Archuleta. That does not automatically mean that I support Scott or Danny. In fact, I think Adam is the greatest thing to ever happen to AI. In discussions of Adam's either "most amazing thing ever" or "that was indulgent, ridiculous blasphemy" performance, I have seen two comparisons discussion most often. The first is that Adam is/is not as original as David Cook. IMO, Cook totally gave up the right to be referred to as original when he released that generic, Nickleback/3 Doors Down/any other prototypical generic pop rock band "Light On" bullshit as his first single. Really Cook?

Second comparison - "Adam is sexually assulting us with his eyes even more than Constantine." Here is where I see a big difference. When Constantine did it, I was afraid for my life. He looked at me like he wanted to get me alone in a dark alley, rape me, mutilate my body and then hide it so the authorities could not find it.

When Adam does it, he just makes me discovery naughty things about myself that I never knew.

March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
heather
Reply
replied to comment from Scott Schrantz

I totally agree with you Scott. I'm firmly in the camp of those who believe that the whole point is to reimagine the song and perform it in your own style. American Idol is not a karaoke show. It's not about performing the song the same way the original artist did. I mean, how many times do the judges criticize a contestant for doing that and for not "adding their own personality" to the song? The whole point is to show what they would be like as an artist if they win. Personally I think Adam did just exactly that. I was fascinated with Adam's performance, mostly because I'm a huge Johnny Cash fan and I think Adam did a good job. If I wanted to hear a performance of Johnny Cash's cersion, I'd put in my CD and listen to that.

March 19, 2009 12:44 PM
eponah
Reply

I think Adam is a great progression for AI. After a few years of tip-toeing around rock artists, AI finally got one that was a winner. Now they moved up another notch with a fantastic performer.

Other contestants may have good voices, but no one, absolutely no one on AI, now or before, can put on a show like Adam. Absolutely incredible.

March 19, 2009 12:55 PM
Caroline
Reply

As a country music fan, I'm always excited/cautious when country week rolls around on Idol. And to be honest, I only "watch" Idol while doing other things - on my laptop, in the kitchen, etc. So I guess you can say I'm really only into it for the vocal performances.

I don't understand where all the outrage is coming from. Personally, I was much more scarred by Megan Joy's horrible, horrible rendition of Patsy Cline than by Adam's Ring of Fire. I think people are using his version of the song to launch unsaid feelings about his person rather than about his talent. Like him, don't like him, whatever.

I won't say I would go out and purchase his version of the song (which I have said in the past about some David Cook renditions), but I also won't say that it grated on every nerve. I think it's the second week of the themed competition weeks. If he continues to do the same thing week after week, then it will get old. For now, to each his own.

March 19, 2009 1:08 PM
steviethecat
Reply
replied to comment from Craig

You said it! Take a look at thishttp://www.buddytv.com/articles/american-idol/american-idol-8-adam-lambert-h-26702.aspx website. Go Adam!

March 19, 2009 2:58 PM
Outlaw Eye Boinking
Reply

I like Adam Lambert. He may not be anything stunningly new in the music world, but he's certainly something new for American Idol. He's a breath of fresh air as far as that goes.

However, I swear I will NOT vote for him no matter what until he ends his membership in the Constantine Maroulis gross school of eye fucking. It's skeevy and he doesn't need to do it because, unlike Maroulis, Adam Lambert can actually sing.

Dear Adam, the first performance you manage without a single eye fuck, I'll pick up the phone and vote for you 50 times. Truth.

March 19, 2009 4:43 PM
arlingtonmom
Reply

I want to hear Adam sing some 80's stuff - Slave to Love or something by Morrisey. (like them better than Buckley). Mostly, I dig his sense of style, just wish it was a little less Pete Wentz-y.

March 19, 2009 7:03 PM
Beth R.
Reply

I'm a mother, and I'm so on board the Adam Love Train. I simply can't look away. And I wouldn't vote for Danny if you put a loaded gun to my head, so don't lump all us moms together.

Too, I tune into AI to hear something new. If I wanted to hear note-for-note covers of songs I like, I'd listen to the originals since no one could ever do it better without changing it. I give Adam props for finding a way to make a theme that he clearly dislikes work for him. And those who would slam him for cheating the theme are hypocritical if they don't apply the same judgment to Anoop and Matt who also turned country songs into slower ballads.

What I've figured out is that it seems to be a real Good vs. Evil/Darkside vs. Lightness contest when it comes to Adam vs. Danny. Adam represents all that's subversive and off limits in our society, while Danny is supposed to personify all Jesus-loving, righteous living saintlyness. And I'll pick a Bad Boy over a Goody Two Shoes any day of the week.

March 19, 2009 7:59 PM
berne
Reply

My favorte ai-ers: kelly, clay, cook, jason castro, brooke. I'm 55, and adam completely entertains me. I think he's great - I would definitely go to one of his concerts. I don't have the balls to wear dark nail polish or eye liner like he does - but it's not even his looks - it's his voice, and his performance level. Just thinking about every other contestant on ai this year - they don't give a performance. Adam does. go Adam.

March 19, 2009 9:45 PM
Megan
Reply

i think he destroyed a perfectly good and famous country song by an artist with actual talent. he scarred my memory of that song forever. it was wretched. enough said

March 20, 2009 12:36 AM
Phyllis
Reply

I'm not into contemporary Christian music, I'm not a country fan nor am I homophobic, I could care less who he's sleeping with. I just don't get Adam, he isnt my cup of tea. I was a major Elliot Yamin fan and I see now how irritated people must have been with my complete love for Elliot. I adore his voice and I know Adam's tone and clarity of voice is ten times better than Elliot's but I don't like the way Adam uses his instrument. It's not for me and that's alright because thank goodness the producers give us a variety of people to identify with.

March 20, 2009 1:52 AM
ka
Reply

I love Adam, he's my favorite contestant this year...however, I'm sorry, I just didn't get his performance. I just didn't. I had to agree with Simon's comment that it was a bit self indulgent... and I just think that "Ring Of Fire" is a song that shouldn't be touched or changed especially in that way... it would have been weird no matter who was singing it, to me.

March 20, 2009 1:56 AM
Kat
Reply

Adam is the only interesting thing about AI this year. He's provocative, insanely talented, and entertaining. You can keep the rest of the wedding singers on the show (I'm looking at you, Gokey).

Burn it down, Adam!

March 20, 2009 5:04 AM
Karrie
Reply

Word.

March 20, 2009 6:33 AM
katri
Reply

I think Kara thinks it strange because they went into tonight expecting to hear a country rendition of a country song. The same as Simon. He's no fan of country and he is expecting country songs. THIS IS NOT A COUNTRY VERSION OF A COUNTRY SONG. Adam stayed true to himself and made himself stand out -- and if you look back to what the judges have been saying season after season, it's what they want. Someone different. Randy Jackson said it all, "It's young... it's hip... it's FRESH."

I actually don't get it. Adam changes things up, Simon didn't like it. Lil, on the other hand, stayed true to country, opposite of what Adam did... and Simon still didn't like it. Strange.

I agree with the part on Anoop. He is GOOD at best. Had he auditioned BEFORE Slumdog Millionaire came out, I don't think he'll get half the attention he's getting today.

March 20, 2009 10:33 PM
donnie
Reply

The Judges say over, and over again to make the song your own. To not sound like the original. So here's Adam doing just that, making it his own, putting his own spin on it and everyone suddenly has their panties in a twist. If you want to hear the original, the way it was "intended to sound" listen to the original. If the judges don't want them to "make it their own" they shouldn't say it. Adam is a fantastic performer. He has amazing vocal ability. I love Adam and every week he's had my vote. It's about time someone doesn't stick with the cookie-cutter, perfect little American Idol contestants. Everyone is just afraid of Adam because he breaks the box, he's original. The only thing about Adam I don't like is that he's gay, being gay means I have no shot at being with Adam. Lol. He took a risk, get over it people. Country week is not to sing a COUNTRY SONG JUST LIKE THE ORIGINAL. If it was, they wouldn't have let Adam do his own thing.

March 22, 2009 1:40 PM
Glenda
Reply

I agree w/ every point Mindy made in the blog. I had stopped watching Idol, as I thought it was so cookie cutter. Then, there was Adam. Now, not only am I watching, I am voting for the first time ever.
Adam did ROF his way and I just loved it. His version was a cross between Universal Pass in '03 and Dilana (SuperNova) in '07. Stirring to say the least--I melted in my freaking Lazy Boy. The guy oozes sexuality--and I am fine with that. Actually--more than just fine. I'm straight and I plan on having his CD playing in the background for that special moment--no drugs needed.

March 22, 2009 7:12 PM
Eeeuw
Reply
replied to comment from Brixtonville

Speaking as a wife, if I die unexpectedly during a routine operation and my husband is out flogging my butt at an AI audition a miserable FOUR WEEKS LATER I am not only haunting his ass, I'm going to give every one of my other-worldly karma points to the competition.
Which might, actually, explain the Adam phenom...

March 23, 2009 9:04 AM
Glenda
Reply

Boy, Eeeuw--I guess you would haunt--3 times over! ROFL

March 26, 2009 10:16 AM
Thorne
Reply

Hey... don't blame all of the Twilight fans for Gokey! I happen to find him unbearably irritating and dude... though it's sad, she's dead. Let her rest in piece. Now as for the Jonas Bro fans... I can not speak for those people.

Adam in all his hot weirdness is amazing and I agree the best thing to happen to AI. I too haven't watched the past two seasons because it was so lamely predictable.

March 26, 2009 11:00 PM
Whit
Reply

Adam is the kind of performer you either love or you hate, their is no in between. The problem I have with Adam is the way this article has decided to defend him and how several contestants in the past could be described in the same way.

Blake Lewis was "not boring" he "took risks" he was AI's first beat-boxer and back then people would also defend him saying that he was the best thing that could have happened to American Idol. If I really wanted to be rude I would compare Adam to Sanjaya but I think Adam is better than that. So while I do agree that it is unique artists like Adam Lambert that keep this show going after all these years, I am not convinced Adam will be a viable artist after his stint on the show is over.

That being said, his followers seem to guarantee his spot in the top 2, time will only tell whether or not Adam has any real staying power.

April 5, 2009 2:55 PM
Shelley
Reply
replied to comment from Craig

"Because America may allow AI contestants to have a penis, as long as they never, ever imply they know what to do with it. Brixtonville hit the nail on the head: voters want the safe, nice boy who is happy with holding hands and Waiting For Marriage. Meanwhile, Adam is the bad boy who wants you to Touch Him There.

Add to that the shocking originality (people complain about the homogenized AI year after year, but still manage to shit the bed when someone breaks the mold) and alternative sexuality (AI voters will vote for an openly gay contestant the day he/she graduates Jesus camp and forsakes same sex lovin'), and you have a contestant that doesn't fit into the nice, neat Ken Doll box that voters are comfortable with. Also, he eyefucks them until they're sore."

Yesssssssssss. Yes, yes, yes.

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

February 2012

6 Entries

January 2012

78 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries