BLOGS

Cupid: Where Is the Love?

by Angel Cohn April 22, 2009 1:30 PM
Cupid: Where Is the Love?

Scripted shows about matchmakers have not fared well in the last decade. Cupid (original flavor) got cancelled; Miss Match was a blink-and-you-missed-it series; there was that terrible CW sitcom Love, Inc; the even worse sorta-CW series Valentine; and this fall's The Ex List (about a girl finding love with the help of a psychic) was the latest similarly themed casuality. I was hoping that this new version of Cupid would buck the trend since it's got a lot going for it. The original has a strong cult following, it's from the mind of Veronica Mars creator Rob Thomas and Bobby Cannavale seems like a good fit to take over the role originated by Jeremy Piven. But I've been nothing but disappointed since the show premiered. In fact when I found out that last night's Cupid had been bumped for an episode of The Unusuals, I was relieved. Probably not as relieved as our weecapper Cindy, but for me it was one less thing I had to worry about watching. This is not how I wanted to be feeling about any show from Rob Thomas at this point... or really at any point. Sorry, Mr. Thomas, I much prefer your current Party Down... at least that makes me laugh.

The romantic in me wanted to love this show at first sight, but the cynic in me realizes that with most relationships you need to know when things just aren't going to work out. That's the case here. I'm about ready to cut my losses, because I've got a bunch of issues with the show... not the least of which is that I can barely stay awake when it is on. The dialogue isn't sharp and witty, and the gimmick feels tired after three outings. The supporting cast of friends/barflies seems tacked-on, like an afterthought, and the couple-of-the-week scenario only works if you like the couples, which is hard, since you barely know them, and then if you do like them, they're gone the next week. But the biggest problem is the lack of chemistry between the two leads, Bobby Cannavale's Cupid/Trevor and Sarah Paulson's Claire.

Their charmless relationship wouldn't be such a problem if the show didn't keep insisting that these two should be together. It would be fine if the set-up was that she was the skeptic and he was the dreamer and they bickered their way through the day, but that's not the case here. Having characters (like Claire's mom) constantly insisting that they are a couple, or thinking they are together, or putting them in romantic scenarios, still isn't going to make me buy them as Cupid and Psyche. There aren't any sparks. This is no David and Maddie, or Sam and Diane, or Mulder and Scully. Opposites may attract, but even their sparring matches aren't that entertaining. I'm much more engaged with the couple on Castle right now, and I don't even care if they ever date, I just like seeing them going head-to-head all the time.

Perhaps my expectations for Cupid were too high. When I think of Rob Thomas and a romantic couple, Logan and Veronica immediately come to mind. On paper, they're a terrible pair, but together they set the screen on fire. But Trevor and Claire are more like Veronica and Piz, where you can buy them as pals, but not romantically entangled. I'm not sure it is the actors' fault that they lack that magical spark when paired up -- sometimes acting skills can't even generate that sort of unpredictable heat that makes these relationships believable -- but someone along the way should have considered recasting if the entire series rests on their shoulders.

Basically, this show about love is breaking my heart, and the TV gods must be crazy if they think that I'm going to stick around much longer. And I can't imagine that non-VM or old-school Cupid lovers will even last that long. Perhaps if they had titled this series Miss Matched...

Are you feeling the love? Draw back your bow and let your arrow flow, below.

TAGS:

10 Comments

April 23, 2009 12:09 AM
demac
Reply

Sarah Paulson is kind of a showkiller :(. Sorry, Rob Thomas, you were awesome, but you couldn't beat her bad mojo.

April 23, 2009 12:23 AM
demac
Reply

Admin, sorry, seem to have been some submission problems - please delete repeat posts above.

April 23, 2009 12:59 AM
Steve
Reply

So, demac, what's your opinion on Sarah Paulson again?

April 23, 2009 1:35 AM
Brody
Reply

Poor demac, he seems to have some spontaneous submission issues going on.

I really want to like this show, but it's just not happening for me. I like the guest stars, and I like Cannavale, and I even like that Felix guy, but Sarah Paulson's Claire feels all wrong to me. I heard a rumor that Jenna Elfman was their first choice, and I keep wishing the PTB had cast her instead.

April 23, 2009 9:07 AM
Evamarie
Reply

I've only watched 2/3 of the episodes. I can buy that Cupid has an attraction to Claire. He pulls that off - but, she does not have any sort of thing for him.
I also have issues with their ideas of "love". That whole screen-saver of the girl by the Private Eye is creepy. They need couples to take longer than an episode to fall in love.
Also - the moment they kiss the gods declare it true love? Some true love couples can (and should) take longer to fall in love.
What could help the love at first sight - they should have made it more fairy-tale-esque, like Pushing Daisies

April 23, 2009 9:58 AM
Leen
Reply

Jenna Elfman would have been worse. I liked the original series better. Kill this show already.

April 23, 2009 2:57 PM
WW
Reply

I think the problem is the casting, namely Paulson. Who can't have chemistry with Bobby Cannavale? The first two episodes were ok. The last one was pretty annoying. But I agree, if the show's premise is that the two leads are supposed to be heating up the screen, this just is never going to work.

April 23, 2009 4:39 PM
ferretrick
Reply

Paulson's definitely the problem here, and usually I like her. But, she plays Claire so unlikable-all she does is complain and condescend to people. Its very hard to buy her as a therapist because her snottiness and above-it-all attitude would drive patients away. Certainly it doesn't make me want to watch the characer, or root for her to get someone as hot and awesome as Bobby Canavale.

April 23, 2009 7:18 PM
Cindy McLennan
Reply
replied to comment from Evamarie

whole screen-saver of the girl by the Private Eye is creepy.

So, so creepy. I had to put it aside to get through the episode.

Also - the moment they kiss the gods declare it true love?

No. Time elapses, sometimes days, or weeks between scenes. It's still not good.

Angel, you'll let me know right away once it's canceled, right? Pretty please.

May 1, 2009 1:29 AM
scarletletter
Reply

The obvious problem with the show is the lack of chemistry between the two stars. The bigger problem though, is the writing. It's clunky and when it comes to fruition on screen, you can tell. Also the couple-a-show thing is awful which is why we get "creep screensaver" as love.
I like the show a lot and am more than willing to give it a shot. But it's probably not for hardcore old-Cupid fans, but my friends and I like it. It's relatable, which Pushing Daisies wasn't but still escapist, much like Sex and the City.

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

May 2012

61 Entries

April 2012

71 Entries

March 2012

68 Entries

February 2012

64 Entries

January 2012

78 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

77 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries