BLOGS

Matthew Fox Quits Television; We're Not So Sure That's a Good Idea

As the world girds itself for the final season of Lost, they have something else to get ready to say good-bye to besides the greatest TV show of the last decade. They can say good-bye to Matthew Fox, because he says he's done with television after this. Now, we're all for the man wanting to do more with his career, but we're not sure swearing off the medium he's been working in for so long is the way to go. Here are just a few reasons why Fox may want to issue a retraction.

1. He's Great on Television
Seriously, look at his resume -- Party of Five was his first regular TV gig, and after six years and 142 episodes as Charlie Salinger it had made his career. He had a failure in the short-lived series Haunted, in which he played a detective who can see murdered ghosts, but it was a mere pit stop on the road to playing Jack on Lost, another hit in which he was the most famous face, and arguably the most important character. He was clearly meant to be on TV, and we can chalk the failure of Haunted up to supernatural forces that wanted to save the concept for his Po5 co-star Jennifer Love Hewitt.

2. He's Not Great in Movies
Or, rather, he's in not-great movies. We Are Marshall? Sap-fest. Vantage Point? Intricate but repetitive. Speed Racer? Overcooked train wreck. We'd say he needs to pick better movies, but we're not sure his everyman persona will make him good for anything other than generic action movies and dull romances. That said we'd totally watch him in a generic action movie (he had a small part in Smoking Aces, which was pretty cool), but we'd rather someone gave him an action TV show, so we'd get a taste every week.

3. Forcing a Transition to Movies Never Works
David Caruso left NYPD Blue, made Jade and a string of noir-ish flops, then came crawling back to have a hit with CSI Miami. Julianna Margulies walked away from ER, made Ghost Ship and Snakes on a Plane, and is now winning awards for The Good Wife. Taking a break to make a few movies is one thing, but by saying that's all he's doing, Fox is setting himself up to fail, and he could be cutting himself off from some of the most fulfilling work of his career.

4. Don't Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth
We're sure TV schedules can be grueling, what with night shoots and the like, but think about it -- Fox just had a guaranteed gig for six years that forced him to live in Hawaii. Hawaii! Sure, it's not a soundstage in Los Angeles a few miles from his house, but it's freaking America's paradise. With movies, he'd be in a different place every month, and there's no guarantee the next cast/crew/director will be as pleasant to work with as the last. At least with TV he's got consistency. That's why movie actors take roles on TV in the first place -- so they don't get stuck in Prague for six weeks with Uwe Boll.

5. You're No George Clooney
No offense, Matt, but it's true. Clooney is perhaps the most glowing example of someone successfully transitioning from TV to movies, and we're talking about a guy who possesses loads of natural charm. (Leonardo DiCaprio and Bruce Willis also spring to mind.) You're charming in your own way, but you can be a little wooden, and there are more big movie stars who ended up as big TV stars than vice versa. Play the odds.

Of course, he could also be talking about stage acting. What do you think of the fantastic Mr. Fox getting out of TV for good?

17 Comments

February 2, 2010 3:10 PM
nan
Reply

I was with you until you denigrated We Are Marshall. I grew up near Huntington and knew the brother of one of the 4 players whose bodies couldn't be identified. Calling a movie about a real-life tragedy of that magnitude a sap-fest makes it sound like some dopey rom-com or typical underdog football story, which it isn't. I know Psychology instructors who use it to demonstrate the grief process to their classes. Aside from that, it's nice to have another movie to add to my oh-so-small WV movies collection, right up there with October Sky and Matewan.

February 2, 2010 3:16 PM
kricka
Reply

I just think he is tired. Many an actor has said something along these lines at the end of something very successful and changed their minds later. Such is the way of those moody, moody actorly types! I bet if he finds something he likes, he'll go for it.

February 2, 2010 5:12 PM
arcee
Reply

Say what you want about Speed Racer but he was awesome as Racer X. His face at the end, when he's asked if he made the right decision to stay 'away' from his family was great acting.

February 2, 2010 7:54 PM
Mae
Reply

I agree with Kricka. I think he's just tired. He's done 6 years of hugely successful tv. That takes it's toll but I hope he reconsiders.

February 2, 2010 7:55 PM
Mae
Reply

Ooops, correction. He's done TWO lots of 6 years of TV which makes 12 long years.

February 3, 2010 1:05 AM
Andy Bluebear
Reply

The greatest TV show of the last decade? It always seemed to me like more hype and style over substance...it's a good show, but greatest? I guess people bought the hype of Darelton and Cruse...

As for the topic, I think he needs to just pick better movies. With that said, I would also like to see him play something very different to Charlie Salinger and Jack Shepard, the 2 were very similar as characters. Maybe someone more like Sawyer? Or a very sleazy person? I think his best bet is to focus on TV, and take smaller, more interesting parts in movies...try and flex his acting muscles.

February 3, 2010 12:51 PM
jen
Reply
replied to comment from nan

@ Nan- Get over it. Just because the events portrayed were based on something that really happened doesn't mean that the movie wasn't a sap-fest. They are not the same thing- it was not a documentary after all. You can criticize the movie without criticizing the real-life people. We're not 5 here- I think we can make the distinction.

February 3, 2010 3:11 PM
NAN
Reply

I know there is a difference between reality and fiction. Sap usually refers to crap like Nicholas Sparks movies and dead dog stories. I don't find a story about 75 people dying and a community trying to recover sappy, especially since it doesn't end with an easy happily ever after. Sappy usually implies indulgence in excess sentimentality (see the OED); what in this movie in over-indulgent? I don't even know anyone who calls this a tear-jerker or cried when they watched it, except those who were directly connected to the real story. I think it was a well-made portrayal of a real-life event that stayed true to the story and emotionally was pretty subtle. I think TWoP had a short list of films to criticize to make their point for the sake of this article, and over-reached on this one because they had to find a slam for one of the few recognizable film roles Fox has done.

February 3, 2010 6:08 PM
Kelli
Reply

I have to back Nan up on this one. I'm not one that is overly sensitive and "PC" - if someone calls a movie I like sappy or a chick-flick I can laugh and agree. But in this case the content of the movie was real, not just sappy melodrama. The plane crash happened. Real people died. It devastated the entire community. I am from Huntington, my mom went to Marshall and was pregnant with me when the plane crashed. She had friends on the plane, and was close friends with the girlfriend of the quarterback. I moved to Ohio when I was 5, but I grew up knowing the story. I have come to realize that "outsiders" don't fully get it. To really understand the impact the plane crash had on Huntington, you have to know how much that school means to the community. Huntington is small, although big by WV standards, and is a mostly lower income, working-class community. Marshall University IS Huntington. Marshall football was, and still is, the pride of the community. There are no pro sports teams in the state. The only other "big" sports team is WVU. If you have ever seen Friday Night Lights, it is the same feel. You drive through downtown and you see green and white everywhere. Businesses, houses, cars, people. A lot of cities have a sports team with a loyal following. But to Huntington, that was all they had. To the people of Huntington (myself included) there is nothing sappy about that tragedy or the movie. I would agree the movie wasn’t a hit, and wasn’t the best movie made that year, but to dismiss it as sappy just for purpose of having an example is doing a disservice to the people that died and the community that survived. I get this is supposed to be a light-hearted take on why Matthew Fox should stick to TV, but I think his short movie resume itself is the best example.

February 3, 2010 8:00 PM
Mema
Reply

I will miss seeing him -- interesting that he is not the only one from Lost to do this. But he should do what he wants, especially if he's got enough money to live on and then some.

February 4, 2010 1:36 AM
Sara
Reply

I love Fox, think he's been great on LOST and I for one would like for him to continue with TV for the simple reason that, as mentioned, I'd get to see him every week! Still, I wish him the best in films or whatever he chooses to do.

February 4, 2010 10:17 AM
Lola
Reply

The few interviews I've seen/read with Fox he seems like a pretty low-key guy. I doubt this is about his ego wanting to be a big movie star, maybe he just would like the variety. Playing the same character for six years might get boring for an actor. I mean, have we ever seen Jack crack a legitimate smile?

February 5, 2010 1:33 PM
jack
Reply

Well, if he's thinking about jumping into porn, then I'm all for it!

March 22, 2010 2:33 PM
Sukie
Reply

He may just be saying this because he is tired of the grind of being the star of LOST for so long. I am not sure if there will be fantastic movie scripts coming his way - he'll see generic action movie scripts passed over by bigger stars. Some stars have made that TV to movie transition as you say - you forgot Johnny Depp, who made his first mark on 21 Jump Street. But Fox is in his 40s, not his early 20s or 30s. So he might be making movies where he is a second lead or movies that are second-tier projects.

May 25, 2010 2:04 PM
quaid oralious
Reply

He is truly talented and is going to really surprise people in the coming years with some very different roles.

July 28, 2011 3:25 PM
Gucci Replica Handbags
Reply

Basically they are promoting the brand, has made Louis Vuitton items such as earrings features one of the best parts of the country. It was a classic of classics when it comes to designer items. Lately their earrings are very fashionable, and Fake Louis Vuitton Handbags.

December 23, 2011 3:50 AM
Afton Klaman
Reply

Hello my friend! I want to say that this article is awesome, nice written and include almost all vital infos. I’d like to see more posts like this .

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

February 2012

3 Entries

January 2012

78 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries