BLOGS

The Whole Truth: Our Verdict On This New Legal Show

Another legal show. Just what we needed. Honestly, nearly every fall season there is some sort of show about lawyers either defending the little guy or prosecuting big baddies, and sometimes there are even several of them. This year is no exception, with The Defenders, Outlaw and now The Whole Truth. Is it worth watching? I've examined the evidence -- well, the pilot at least -- to figure out where this show stacks up in the court of TV law.

In The Show's Defense
The gimmick in The Whole Truth is that we get to see both sides of the case unfold, which is actually interesting. Instead of just seeing a lopsided presentation where lawyers try and find some way to prove that that their client is totally innocent (or vice versa), we see both the prosecution and defense going head-to-head.

Maura Tierney has a job. After having to bow out of Parenthood because of her battle with cancer, it's good to see her back in a starring role as the show's district attorney.

It's well-edited. The show jumps back and forth, giving little bits of information at a time and then showing how the mounting evidence helps and hinders the various cases. If this was done poorly, it would be hard to follow, but the editors here deserve a lot of credit for executing this in a watchable fashion.

It has as solid supporting cast: Eammon Walker (from Oz), Christine Adams (who played the bitchy dog lady on Pushing Daisies and Anthony Ruivivar (from Third Watch). These three are credible actors who really round out the cast... presuming that they have more to do in future episodes.

There's a twist. In the last minute of the show, we see information that shows if the person on trial was actually guilty or innocent, potentially going against our expectations.

The Case Against It
Rob Morrow plays kind of a tool. I enjoyed him on Numb3rs and, of course, on Northern Exposure, but there's something about his pompous and far too casual character that just doesn't make for a credible defense attorney. Wearing sneakers and such, always playing basketball, his goofy banter with judges.... it's a wonder he ever wins cases.

Crimes get solved too quickly. It always amazes me that these trials seem to happen over the course of a few days (in the pilot, the mention of an NYU event happening soon gets brought up repeatedly giving the whole trial a short window) instead of the months that it normally takes in real life. It's almost ridiculous.

There's too much personal stuff. Frankly, not every show needs to have its leads have some sort of potential romantic entanglement, and that seems to be what they are hinting at here with the shared law school past between the leads and Morrow's Jimmy asking Tierney's Kathryn out to the movies. It's completely unnecessary. I'd almost rather them hate each other. And I definitely don't need to know about Kathryn's predilection for dating younger men with music gigs.

The Verdict
This series is probably the best of the legal bunch this season, not being as over-the-top as The Defenders and not suffering from a preposterous premise like Outlaw, but while it has a unique presentation and is well-produced, it isn't exactly must-see TV. It is just another procedural where cases get neatly wrapped up in a bow at the end of an episode and we see these two lawyers butt heads week after week. I'll watch it because there's not a lot of worthy shows on in this timeslot (aside from the addictive Terriers) and I am a sucker for legal dramas, but if something else comes along, The Whole Truth might fall off my radar.

Want to immediately access TWoP content no matter where you are online? Download the free TWoP toolbar for your web browser. Already have a customized toolbar? Then just add our free toolbar app to get updated on our content as soon it's published.

19 Comments

September 23, 2010 9:57 AM
Sara L.
Reply

I thought it was a really well done procedural, for the most part. Love Maura Tierney, of course. I could have done without the little reveal at the end, though. I thought the ambiguity was very realistic, and then they have to go and tie it up with a bow.

September 23, 2010 10:38 AM
Dana
Reply

I thought the critics gave the show far too little credit - it had its share of novelty and I was pleased by the quick pace...maybe they just can't keep up?

Maura Tierney really does rock any role she takes on, and this was no exception. But please note, she's the prosecution, and Rob Morrow is the defense.

September 23, 2010 10:52 AM
Annabelle
Reply

Noted. District attorney = prosecution.

September 23, 2010 11:28 AM
Kelly
Reply

I thought, when I originally heard about this show, they were going to leave it ambiguous - both whether the person did it, and the jury result. I can see the need to provide the jury result, but I liked the concept of complete ambiguity over whether or not someone did it, since it makes the focus on how the attorneys did their jobs.

September 23, 2010 11:29 AM
LTG
Reply

I really wish they were using a rotating pool of defense attorneys, and not just because I can't stand Rob Morrow. It's just not believable that in NYC, a prosecutor and defense attorney would face off against each other over and over again.

Despite my dislike of Rob Morrow, I'll keep watching. I love Maura Tierney, and I love Simone from Pushing Daisies.

September 23, 2010 12:23 PM
LH
Reply

I don't get how the reveal at the end is a unique concept, because I feel like most legal dramas (or at least David Kelly's legal dramas) always did this.

And I enjoyed the pilot for the most part, but I feel like the unrealistic reveal at the end kind of ruined the whole thing...(SPOILER ALERT)I mean, the police never searched the suspect's office??? I just think that scene could have easily been handled much better.

September 23, 2010 12:30 PM
cosmonala
Reply

"Rob Morrow plays kind of a tool. I enjoyed him on Numb3rs and, of course, on Northern Exposure, but there's something about his pompous and far too casual character that just doesn't make for a credible defense attorney. Wearing sneakers and such, always playing basketball, his goofy banter with judges.... it's a wonder he ever wins cases."
Have you never met a defense attorney???
Interesting enough to keep tuning in, though I may have to DVR this to watch "Terriers" live.

September 23, 2010 12:44 PM
Shay J
Reply

Wasn't there a show on a few years ago that was similar to this? We saw only one side; but at the end of the episode we're shown what actually happens? I can't remember what it's called though.

September 23, 2010 2:03 PM
Brie
Reply
replied to comment from Shay J

I remember that show, Shay. It starred Victor Garber and it was supposed to be very flashy because it took place in Hollywood or something. The reveal at the end was the only reason I watched the show.

September 23, 2010 2:18 PM
Eve K.
Reply

Maybe I've just watched too many episodes of "Law & Order", but this show had way too many plot holes for my taste. The chief suspect's home is never searched for evidence? The medical examiner doesn't notice the wounds on the victim's leg until *after* the DNA is already back from the lab? The prosecution confidently asserts that those wounds were made by the victim's crucifix, even though the necklace has not been found (and the defense doesn't dispute this claim)?

September 23, 2010 2:19 PM
Trish
Reply

This show is the same format, complete with the reveal at the end, of a procedural that was on Fox a few years ago. Victor Garber and that kid from Dawson's Creek starred in it. Both were produced by Bruckheimer. This feels like they just re-tooled the Fox show a bit and submitted it to another network. It's the same exact show. I also agree that Morrow's character is a huge tool, and his diction is extremely distracting. He talks like Val Vilmer in Tombstone.

September 23, 2010 2:21 PM
Amanda
Reply
replied to comment from Shay J

That was "Justice", one of FOX's many shows that never really got developed or promoted beyond the first airing. Could've been a really good show if they'd had time to work with it, but of course, that's not allowed there. (And no, I'm not at all bitter over FOX's continual killing of my shows - why do you ask?) Seriously, though, the reveal gave it the extra twist it needed, particularly when one of the last ones to air proved that they'd been wrong and a young man they defended really was innocent of the crime he was convicted of.

September 23, 2010 2:22 PM
Beth
Reply
replied to comment from Shay J

The show you are thinking of is Justice.

September 23, 2010 8:27 PM
Annabelle
Reply
replied to comment from cosmonala

"have you never met a defense attorney?"

It's funny because it's true.

September 26, 2010 10:51 AM
Kimberlie Starrick
Reply

This is awesome!! Spotify is the greatest thing ever, i hope it comes to USA soon!

September 26, 2010 2:06 PM
Shay J
Reply

Thanks for the help in naming that show! I remember liking it because of the end, where you say everything. I feel that show was a bit more flashier somehow. It could've been great had they had time to develop it properly and oh yeah, it was promoted.

You don't have Victor Garber on a show that you aren't gonna promote. That's just stupid. Also, yes, bitter about many Fox cancellations. :P

September 29, 2010 7:04 PM
Patrice
Reply

Did the father do the killing last week or the daughter? I don't think it was clear.

September 30, 2010 3:56 PM
Gerry
Reply

After Northern Exposure I eagerly followed Rob Morrow to Numbers where I was disappointed in his lack of a key role as he took a back seat to his brother. Now , in just another court room drama I see nothing special except to tell the directors to give Morrow a shave. He looks like an unshaven crud. I would not hire that dirt bag who can not find his razor in the morning. Ihave seen two episodes and now call it quits.

July 28, 2011 7:39 PM
Gucci Replica Handbags
Reply

Anything I can do by people who can afford these designer Versace bags wholesale, is estimated to receive. Some people are like that with the glory of the Prada handbags, Jimmy Choo handbags, shopping bags are on the Versace trademark infringement obsessed on the market. But the question that arises here is that buying the fake brand bags worth.

Loading...

Add a comment

TWoP Toolbar

BLOG ARCHIVES

The Telefile

May 2012

11 Entries

April 2012

71 Entries

March 2012

68 Entries

February 2012

64 Entries

January 2012

78 Entries

December 2011

49 Entries

November 2011

56 Entries

October 2011

74 Entries

September 2011

78 Entries

August 2011

61 Entries

July 2011

56 Entries

June 2011

57 Entries

May 2011

57 Entries

April 2011

78 Entries

March 2011

73 Entries

February 2011

57 Entries

January 2011

65 Entries

December 2010

39 Entries

November 2010

45 Entries

October 2010

46 Entries

September 2010

62 Entries

August 2010

55 Entries

July 2010

53 Entries

June 2010

65 Entries

May 2010

59 Entries

April 2010

57 Entries

March 2010

67 Entries

February 2010

53 Entries

January 2010

59 Entries

December 2009

32 Entries

November 2009

47 Entries

October 2009

65 Entries

September 2009

66 Entries

August 2009

58 Entries

July 2009

72 Entries

June 2009

71 Entries

May 2009

50 Entries

April 2009

57 Entries

March 2009

66 Entries

February 2009

52 Entries

January 2009

56 Entries

December 2008

51 Entries

November 2008

71 Entries

October 2008

88 Entries

September 2008

86 Entries

August 2008

120 Entries

July 2008

115 Entries

June 2008

90 Entries

May 2008

44 Entries

April 2008

30 Entries

March 2008

26 Entries

February 2008

30 Entries

January 2008

44 Entries

December 2007

31 Entries

November 2007

66 Entries