BLOGS
Summer shows can be such fun, can't they? Like kids on summer break, most cable networks tend to let loose for a few weeks once the weather gets humid, goofing around with the light and frothy. It's a harmless tradition, and every now and again, something worth sticking with (like ABC Family's Pretty Little Liars) emerges from this brain-vacation time... But don't count on that happening with TNT's Franklin & Bash.
It's too bad, because this show has many of the ingredients for a warm-weather distraction, beginning with its two titular lawyers, who are young, handsome, talented and appear to be deeply, shall we say, protocol-challenged, especially in the sexual liaison department. Perhaps the premise would work better if the characters were more likable and the storylines weren't so tired. And to make matters worse, the show takes delight in more than its fair share of dumb, misogynistic punch lines: A co-worker is a "bitchy little barracuda." A debate is held over whether it would be worth it to get punched in the face by Mike Tyson in order to sleep with Scarlett Johansson. There are even multiple penis jokes. (Really.)
True, creator Bill Chais told the New York Post on Saturday that he "wanted to do a Judd Apatow movie in a law firm." The problem is that it's unbelievably hard to make sex-obsessed guys seem sweet and appealing, and there may only be one person can do it with his directorial finesse and casting savvy. Yep, his name is Judd Apatow.
Still, Franklin & Bash tries. The premiere episode begins like a post-Super Bowl episode, designed to capture as many eyeballs as possible. In fact, the very first shot is of a blonde in a bra. The plot moves forward as you might expect from there. Peter Bash (Mark-Paul Gosselaar) and Jared Franklin (Breckin Meyer) run their own firm. They're hip -- they play Wii while they work! -- and (to quote the show) they "make their own rules." Which brings me back to the blonde in the bra. Early in the show, Franklin and Bash are eating at a restaurant when they see a man crash his car right beneath a billboard featuring the cleavage in question. Dropping their food, they run outside, collar the poor guy and tell him he should sue the billboard company. It's their fault he was distracted, gosh darn it!
Fast forward to the trial, where our heroes put the blonde on the witness stand and ask her to display her assets. She does, the jury gasps, they win the case and the next thing you know, the opposing law firm hires them for their unconventional cunning. Next on the docket for Franklin and Bash? You guessed it. Two cases involving public figures and their torrid extramarital affairs.
By the time the hour was over, I was just about ready to give up on the show, but to be fair, there were some moments of potential in the pilot. Bash's complicated relationship with his ex-girlfriend gave the show heart, and Franklin's apparently strained relationship with his yet-to-be-seen father could add some emotional weight.
And then there's the possibility that this show is really and truly for someone I am not: a guy. Sure, there's a shot of Mark-Paul Gosselaar's bare behind, but it feels a little like a bribe for the female contingent. At the end of the day, Franklin and Bash are a duo of cads throwing a frat party. Decide for yourself if you want to attend. The dress code, needless to say, is anything but strict.
Our vlogger Sean Crespo wonders if the show would've been better if the guys were called Tango and Cash:
What are people saying about your favorite shows and stars right now? Find out with Talk Without Pity, the social media site for real TV fans. See Tweets and Facebook comments in real time and add your own -- all without leaving TWoP. Join the conversation now!
Sponsored Links
16 Comments
Add a comment
MOST RECENT POSTS
Today's TWoP News: Monday, April 23, 2012
How Jason Statham Plays it Safe
Trailers Without Pity: The Dictator
If You Like Veep, Watch The Thick of It
Girls: The Good, the Bad and the Funny
Veep: A Heartbeat Away, Oy Vey!
Game of Thrones: Our Weekly Westeros Scorecard
Monday, April 23, 2012: RuPaul's Drag Race
BLOG ARCHIVES
The Telefile
April 2012
56 Entries
March 2012
68 Entries
February 2012
64 Entries
January 2012
78 Entries
December 2011
49 Entries
November 2011
56 Entries
October 2011
74 Entries
September 2011
78 Entries
August 2011
61 Entries
July 2011
56 Entries
June 2011
57 Entries
May 2011
57 Entries
April 2011
78 Entries
March 2011
73 Entries
February 2011
57 Entries
January 2011
65 Entries
December 2010
39 Entries
November 2010
45 Entries
October 2010
46 Entries
September 2010
62 Entries
August 2010
55 Entries
July 2010
53 Entries
June 2010
65 Entries
May 2010
59 Entries
April 2010
57 Entries
March 2010
67 Entries
February 2010
53 Entries
January 2010
59 Entries
December 2009
32 Entries
November 2009
47 Entries
October 2009
65 Entries
September 2009
66 Entries
August 2009
58 Entries
July 2009
72 Entries
June 2009
71 Entries
May 2009
50 Entries
April 2009
57 Entries
March 2009
66 Entries
February 2009
52 Entries
January 2009
56 Entries
December 2008
51 Entries
November 2008
71 Entries
October 2008
88 Entries
September 2008
86 Entries
August 2008
120 Entries
July 2008
115 Entries
June 2008
90 Entries
May 2008
44 Entries
April 2008
30 Entries
March 2008
26 Entries
February 2008
30 Entries
January 2008
44 Entries
December 2007
31 Entries
November 2007
66 Entries
looks so stupid
Well, I must say... from a GUY'S point of view, this is a great Wednesday night summertime filler. Now, I'm not an expert "reviewer" (or blogger for that matter) but this show is certainly enjoyable to watch. Yes, it is predictable, misogynistic, "typecast"-ish and borderline offensive (for some, crossing-the-line). But so are some of our greatest comedies (like "Two and a Half Men").
This show is targeted for young male adults (I would say about 25 to 36). The younger male audiences (especially under 21) may be influenced heavily by the stereotypical "frat boy in a real world" lifestyle. The older male audiences (over 40) will probably find this entertaining, yet juvenile. As for women, this isn't for those who look believe men are chauvinists or believe having double standards are OK.
Yes, to an limited extent, women are objectified, such as Garcelle Beauvias as a sex hungry associate attorney, and the model from the mattress company ad to start the show. And to go out on a limb, other races are stereotyped. We see about four black people out of about 75 to 100 supporting cast members/ background characters (as a black man, this is something I notice) and three out of four of them are in what could be looked at as a "negative role". My sista, Garcelle, as the office "jump off" (Franklin is not the only guy at the firm to have slept with her, but her original fling has to protect his "image"), the other black woman who is their associate is an ex-convict, and a background character is a brotha playing Wii Sports at the firm with Franklin instead of doing what he is paid to do... WORK.
Basically, we can point at how a show is flawed by having subtle tones of what we may consider a prejudice viewpoint or action (which is probably not a far stretch from reality... unfortunately, stereotypes exist for a reason). But if the show is doing what it's supposed to do (bring entertainment and spunk to a Wednesday night summer line up), what's the problem? No harm, no foul! :)
At the end of the day, this is solid comedy. I would never discredit the show for these observations. A person just has to be open minded and not be easily offended by these sort of things.
If all else fails, Mayer could fall back on his Boba Fett from Robot Chicken. This might be one of the shows in which that could actually work.
Don - You lost me when you called "Two and a Half Men" one of our greatest comedies. Everything after that was white noise.
I enjoyed it. I liked the campy and trite jokes ... they work with these two guys. I am a woman, I enjoy good humor. If I was offended by every penis joke in history ... I'd be living a very lonely existence!
I don't know... I'm a 33 year old woman and I'm drawn to it. Zack Morris and Travis-from-Clueless? I feel like this show was MADE for me. I don't want to see either of these guys in a serious procedural (frankly, I don't want to see any more procedurals, period); I want to see them being doofy, politically incorrect, overgrown frat boys in a weekly 45 minutes of brainless entertainment. Sounds like I might get my wish.
What Rachel said.
I popped over from the forums when I heard there was a review here. I'm a 41-y-o female and enjoyed the pilot. I actually did find F&B likable or else it just wouldn't have worked. There are kinks to be ironed out, for sure. I don't really expect shows like this to be realistic, and news flash: guys really do talk like that!! P.S. I'm fine with MPG's butt playing a supporting role in every ep.
Sounds to me like the whole A plot was lifted straight of the Seinfeld episode "The Bra".
I thought it was rather cute and funny. Not emmy worthy TV, but enjoyable summar fare. Oh, and I am an educated, professional woman. I can separate TV from reality.
I'd like to see women represented as real people more often, like men are, rather than sexual objects. This show has all sorts of types of men - old, young, tall, short, chubby, thin, homely, handsome - but the women are all young, incredibly hot 20-somethings, filmed to accentuate their bodies.
Perhaps when the day comes that I can sit with a group of women without hearing about how much they hate their bodies/appearance/wrinkles, etc, just ONCE, then I'll be more forgiving of this kind of entertainment. It's a shame really, because these are clearly some very talented actors. I would just like for women to be able to laugh without being made to feel inadequate.
I'm a woman in her mid-forties who liked the show. I don't care for frat-boy humor, but this was nowhere near as bad as I'd been led to expect. And Garcelle is only a few months younger than I am, Viewer.
"A person just has to be open minded and not be easily offended by these sort of things."
The things you are referring to (your own words) are - misogyny, women being objectified, and (supported by your own very good examples) racial stereotypes.
I doubt this is what you meant, but you're implying that being open minded means that a person is not offended by misogyny and racism.
From a chick's pov I agree completely. This show is just good fun.
Obama wins in a landslide. We hate it, but it will be true. Romney, no substantial difference. Santorum, out of date. Gingrich, so much baggage. Paul, a true contrast, but people are afraid of change.
Im not going to say what everyone else has already said, but I do wish to comment on your information of the topic. Youre truly well-informed. I cant believe how much of this I just wasnt aware of. Thank you for bringing much more information to this topic for me. Im truly grateful and actually impressed.